Procedural Difficiency Paper

The intervention model we use in our school is RTI. With Response to Intervention the instruction that as a function of the outcomes of the assessments. RTI drives changes in hopes to see in students succeed, who are identified at some level of risk for not meeting academic expectations. Tiered instruction represents a model in which the instruction delivered to students varies and are related to the nature and severity of the student's difficulties. This model is sub divided by 3 tiers:

While the different program may vary from state to state, the basis of the models are the same. The RTI process has three tiers. In tier one is labeled curriculum-based classroom

Tier 1 focuses on effective classroom instruction and practices for academics and the management of behavior for all students. Tier 1 includes the quality core instruction and curriculum all students have equal access which incorporates the classroom teacher using proactive data-driven practices to identify and help children who are not being successful (Hilton, 2007). Using research-based differentiated instruction for all learners and a universal screener to measure proficiency at least twice a year are keys to an effective program. These screeners identify students who are not meeting standards. Approximate 80%-90% of students will be successful in a Tier 1 program. If less than this percentage is successful, classroom practices must be evaluated.

RTI was designed for both general and special education students with interventions and instructions

The assigned video is explaining Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI) . This is a plan to make decisions of the educational path of a student. It enhances education for all students and assesses whether they will need additional support with growth or more independence in reading. All of the students in the building have the opportunity to be assessed through RTI not just students with an IEP.

Another idea to improve mathematics performance in elementary level is to encourage the student to link the existing knowledge and the new knowledge effectively while working math problems/examples. A worked example is “a step-by-step demonstration of how to perform a problem” (Clark, Nguyen, & Sweller, 2006, p. 190). This will prepare the students for similar problems in the future as they bridge the connection between the problems and the examples. In many cases, students are encouraged to link the informal ideas with the formal mathematics ideas that are presented by the teacher to be able to solve problems. When students examine their own ideas, they are encouraged to build functional understanding through interaction in the classroom. When students share among themselves on differences and similarities in arithmetic procedures, they construct the relationship between themselves hence making it the foundation for achieving better grades in mathematics. Teachers can also encourage students to learn concepts and skills by solving problems (Mitchell et al 2000). Students do perform successfully after they acquire good conceptual understanding because they develop skills and procedures, which are necessary for their better performance. However, slow learning students should engage in more practice

Another way way use RTI is through our math instruction. Each week, students must complete four pages of Math Facts. On the fifth day, they are quizzed to see if they are moving up to the next level. They also practice the same math facts at home for homework during the week. If students are consistently struggling to move up to the next level, the classroom teacher looks at what could be causing the lack of advancement, and decides what the appropriate next step is. Typically, if she doesn't see the progress she was hoping for, she will create new math centers that will address the deficits.

The chapter goes on to address the topic of RTI (response to intervention). The purpose of RTI is to identify students that need support before they fall behind. There are three tiers for the intervention support. Tier one targets most of the students in the classroom. The teacher will assess the students

There are several parallel thoughts concerning the mathematical learning process. NCTM Standard 1: Mathematics as Problem Solving outlines the expectations for students to refine their method of problem-solving by investigation and integration of

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework based off the problem solving method that integrates assessment, and targeted instruction, within a multi-tiered intervention system. Implementation of RtI in schools is crucial to identify which students need additional intervention that will help increase their literacy skills, and prevent them from falling behind. RtI is based off multi-leveled tiers that are each categorized by the intensity of the intervention that is being used. The RtI framework is also used as a valued tool in monitoring and improving student behavior in the classroom through a model known as Positive Behavioral Intervention Support (PBIS).

How are your lessons designed for student learning of mathematical concepts, procedures/algorithms, and mental math strategies through problem solving?

Response to intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach that identifies and support students with learning disabilities and behavioral issues. RTI is designed for early intervention in struggling children, to provide appropriate instruction, and prevention of special education. The multi-tier approach of RTI consists of multiple levels. The most common used approach is the three-tier model. There are different levels of intervention, which is determined on the specific needs of the student. RTI is considered a dynamic assessment an approach that emphasizes the learning process and is based on the test-intervention-retest model (Cohen, Swerdlik, and Sturman, 2013). Dependent on the child’s response to instruction, the level of intervention will increase and intensify. The three levels of RTI consist of: Tier 1- The whole class, is focused on academically. All students are screened for at risk of failing, teacher uses instruction and intervention, and progress of all students are monitored through assessment. Tier 2- Small group interventions- In addition to the normal classroom setting and instruction, children that do not respond to Tier 1 will move to this level. The child will be placed in small groups with instruction, teacher will monitor progress through assessment, as well has parent involvement at home. Tier 3- Intensive Intervention- this level is the

The author of the article also ascertain that the practice is an effective one since the RTI practice is capable of matching researched-based interventions that are of high quality to the behavioral and educational needs of the students. The practice also uses the concept of monitoring the progress used in assessing need for the require changes in goals or instructions, and finally, the practice may also include the additional tiers for the purpose of instructional intensity or if possible even to be eligible for special education (Rose & Howley,

In this webinar the presenters focus on ELLs and RTI. The first key word is the evidence based assessment and curriculum. The focus of RTI is preventions and maximizing student’s achievement and students are growing academically. The goals are for all students to meet their highest potential and use general education. Sheltered instruction is part of the core curriculum. The core curriculum is meeting at least 80% on each sub group.

The elementary school studied in their review is a diverse school in a mid-size district in the Midwest and had 290 students (Pre-K through fifth grade) enrolled in the 2006–2007 school year. Although it seems that the RTI approach is beneficial for this elementary school, educators and researchers found it important to state that it has become necessary for them to develop their own evidence base in making judgments about their RTI model, and to explore alternatives that produce the data outcomes that they seek for establishing their own evidence-based RTI model as they see fit. Lembke et al. are clear to state that no “one-size-fits-all approach is likely to work when developing and implementing an RTI model” (Lembke et al., p. 371), therefore, it is up to educators to implement an approach that fits well with not only their teaching style but that will reach the most students in the most beneficial