Process Reliabilism: A Case Study

1323 Words5 Pages
Process Reliabilism Process reliabilism is the externalist viewpoint that anything that can be reviewed or verified through a process and/or through empirical evidence in general. In short, it is a way of saying that "x" is true and this can be said because "x" was verified to be true through some process or experiment that verified "x" was indeed true beyond any reasonable amount of doubt. The externalist/process reliabilism runs counter to the inverse viewpoint to process reliabilism, that being the arc of philosophical skepticism point of view which states that anything that is not completely verifiable cannot be asserted to be true. A great example of skepticism in this vein would be agnostics, who state that there is no hard proof one way or another that God exists so no hard-set conclusions in this regard can be made. Process reliabilism is indeed a satisfactory account of knowledge even in light of subjects and topics that are not entirely verifiable and provable and the author of this report shall explain why. A Case for Process Reliabilism While there are many questions that cannot be answered, at least for now, the case for process reliabilism is much stronger than other mindsets in this regard and this includes skepticism. The main reason the author of this report asserts this, in light of the literature to be reviewed, is because even if something cannot be definitively explained, there is most certainly an explanation of some sort. It just cannot be proven

More about Process Reliabilism: A Case Study

Get Access