Progra Program Planning

When an organization starts to make decision about the programs it will offer they have to start thinking about the processes and outcomes they want to use and achieve through their program. They need to find the best ways to run their program that follows their mission and produces outcomes that help support that same mission. Process and outcome evaluations in a human service setting help the organization to better understand the outcomes of their programs and the processes in which the outcomes came. (Yuen, Terao, 2003) This paper will walk you through an explanation and outline of a process and outcome evaluation plan for the PEACE Domestic Violence Agency. This process and outcome evaluation plan would be helpful in the organizations

First, would look at my measurement method to make sure that it is reliable and valid. Making sure that the measurements are representing the people and the program accurately, enough sample size is use to represent the program, and make sure there is no participants contamination. Second, the time from when the program started and when the evaluation process starts can also show that the program have no impact. It takes a long time for programs to work out the kink and bumps along the way and sometimes having an evaluation conducted within a year will not show the program at its full potential. There is also the sleeper effect where the program will not show impact until a much later time. Having an open and clear communication with the stakeholders will let me know what they are looking in the program evaluation so that I can focus on those aspects to make sure I use accurate

A program evaluation offers a way to determine if adjustments are needed to improve upon the project in order for it to remain successful. Furthermore, the project evaluation team will analyze and measure each component of the outcome, input, and process in order to clarify the program’s objectives and goals. Thus creating a framework of evaluation methods and questions in addition to setting up a timeline for the evaluation activities will assist in the evaluation (CDC, 2011; HRSA, n.d.; McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015). The goal of outcome measures is to describe the overall performance of the process; therefore, outcome measurement will determine the program cost-effectiveness, attribution, and efficiency (CDC, 2012; HRSA, n.d.; McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015). There will be additional evaluation concerning the input measures, which are the resources that were put into the process. Lastly, the appraisal of process measures will provide data regarding the performance each course of action involved in the implantation of the project (HRSA, n.d.). After a thorough evaluation of the project, recommendations and the dissemination of results will be prepared and

The plan states goals and sets multiple performance objectives according to that goal. The goals are divided in to sections that coincide with departments. Within each department, the evaluation is based on related sections of the strategic plan. The program evaluations use various forms of measurement, comparing them to the target figure that meets the objective. “Activities” based performance measures are primarily in the General Government departments while the Community Development and Public Safety departments base their evaluations on outcomes.

The program planning activity is an essential stage in the future success of the educational institution and it revolves around the design of all steps and strategies that will have to be taken in order for the institution to meet its final objectives. The success of the project planned and the means in which it was executed are assessed through evaluations, which represent "systematic assessment[s] of the processes and/or outcomes of a program with the intent of furthering its development and improvement" (Office of Educational Assessment).

Finally, the findings will be combined into a report that will be forwarded to the different stakeholders. This evaluation plan begins by identifying the stakeholder involved in the program. They involve CDC, local government, and the population. The second segment contains a detailed description of the program and the methods used to implement it. The third segment outlines the logic model used to implement the CPPW program. The fourth segment is the evaluation design followed by evidence gathering. The last segment outlines how the findings will be communicated and used.

Participant-oriented evaluation is, in my opinion an exceptional methodology used to evaluate a program, organization, or policy. Through the incorporation of participants the evaluator is able to collect, analyze, and generate in-depth findings. It is imperative to note that participant-oriented evaluation approaches share a common similarity, as they all incorporate the use of stakeholders (Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen, 2011). However, each approach intends to use the stakeholders to acquire diverse results. Participant-oriented evaluations encompass the following approaches: responsive evaluation, naturalistic evaluation, practical participatory evaluation, developmental evaluation, empowerment evaluation and democratic evaluation.

Evaluation plans are very important for programs, it help make changes or know if the program will

potential threat to this funding is the department’s performance. Although, the forecast does not appear to be negative in terms of performance outcomes, management needs to be as proactive as possible to make program adjustments to ensure the best possible outcomes. Another constraint the department has to contend with is several programs are operated by volunteers. This situation makes it difficult to predict the security of programs offered to families and youth. Another significant challenge is this organization is tasked with correcting and rehabilitating human behavior which is very complex and difficult to measure. However, it appears the department has a strategic management plan in place to maneuver through the quagmire of social and

Program planning begins with problem analysis. I need to achieve a thorough understanding and a comprehensive study of the problem that the program is to address, to include the type, size, and scope of the problem as well as its relevant

In a diagram in Pal’s book entitled ‘Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times’ (2009), the author displays the 3 core categories of program evaluation, they are as follows: 1. Process evaluation (program activities) 2. Impact evaluation (outcomes) 3. Efficiency Evaluation (cost/benefits). Using this method the Criminal Justice and Public Policy program at the University of Guelph, hereafter referred as CJPP, will be evaluated.

As we read the words Personal Program Planning, the main concept that comes in our mind is Planning. A personal program planning is a process- oriented approach to empowering people with various disabilities labels. It enables the people to choose their own pathways to success. The planner simply helps them to figure out what they want to do, where they want to go and what is the best method of that, instead of just doing everything for them by planner’s own decisions.

Health education program planners should develop a plan of action to aid in decision-making and to guide a program to successful health outcomes. The purpose of planning in any program is to ensure success by being effective and using the least amount of resources.1 An example of a planning strategy would be the development of the Healthy People goals. Healthy People became a framework for state and local health promotion and disease prevention programs.1 A community needs assessments and program evaluations are beneficial in any organization or program because they improve program performance, use of resources, understanding of the context, decision making, and community support.

This program plan contains one goal and four measurable objectives in order to facilitate the planning phase. These goals and objectives may change throughout the program plan, as it is tentative. Furthermore, the goal and each objective will be evaluated at the end of the implementation period in order to ensure each was met.

This paper gives me the chance to look back and reflect on what knowledge developing this program has brought me. Program planning, is something that has always fascinated me. I thoroughly enjoyed learning more about what are important aspects of planning a program. What was truly great about this experience was the idea that we would be helping others. I will discuss what I have learned from developing the program to the conclusion of the event. Furthermore, I will talk about what I can do differently the next time I am apart of a group that is planning a program. Also, there will be sections about what I would change for future programs or what I can take away from the planning of this specific program.