Progressive Tax Systems in Europe and the United States

America currently has a progressive tax system. This system is identified by the fact that there are percentage brackets which are determined by one’s income, as the income increases so does the percentage of the income being taken out. The progressive tax can be illustrated by a curved line going upwards on a graph plotting income bracket on the x axis and amount of money being taken out on the y axis. The flat tax is the proposed tax which is signified by having one single percentage throughout all income brackets this would look like a straight line on the graph explained above.

One example of the progressive tax system is the federal estate tax. This tax only effects the wealthiest of families, those with assets in excess of ten million dollars, families with less than ten million dollars are exempt from this tax. Income taxes are also progressive; as an individual’s income increases there tax burden also increases. But there are provisions that unequally favor the most well to do. These include provisions for stock dividends and profits from real estate sales to be taxed at much lower rates

If the government starts doing that it would be fairer because everyone is getting the right amount of tax based on their income. But right now the rich and poor have to pay the same amount of money and it doesn’t matter about their income. Right now the rich should not really care about the taxes because they are rich and it doesn’t matter to them. But the taxes do matter to the poor people because they have really less amount of income and a large amount of taxes will affect them. The government has all records of people’s incomes and other information, so if the government makes a rule that the people with more income pay more taxes and the people with less income pay fewer taxes, it would be much better. But the taxes go to the government and the government makes the America better by making newer roads, better environment, and

The tax system in the United States has changed throughout the years, with many attempts to make it "fair" or "equal" while at the same time generating enough income for the United States government to thrive. It is a complex issue, and a controversial one at that. While it may not be possible for our tax system to ever be fair, it is important to make sure it doesn 't put more financial stress and pressure on one group than on another.

One theory about the use of the progressive taxation is that people or businesses who earn the same or a similar amount of money should be taxed in the same or a similar way. A good example of that theory states that two individuals making $75,000 per year should be taxed the same amount, regardless of how they earned their income. While most countries have some form of progressive taxation, it is usually combined with other taxes, such as a sales tax, and few countries treat all income as exactly the same. This kind of taxation is still in effect today, bigger corporations are taxed more than the smaller mom and pop businesses.

In recent years, a growing gap between the wealthy and the middle class has grown, as the wealth of the world has increased significantly, yet only a minority of individuals get to enjoy it. Income inequality has been proven to be detrimental to not only the economy, but to the overall well-being of a nation as it leads to societal upset and can potentially prompt a decline in progression as a nation. Over time, income inequality has led to negative results in the United States, as well as many other nations including Greece. Consequently, the solution to prevent income inequality from deteriorating a nation and prevent economic upset is to ultimately tax those who are wealthier at a higher rate and put said money towards education and healthcare

Income inequality is often presented as the percentage of income to a percentage of populations. To put it simply, wealthy households of the top 1% are holding a greater share of the nation’s income than everyone else. “The United States in particular has much higher rates of income inequality than other developed countries” (Brooks, 2014). In recent years, economists have debated whether it has become a hindrance, has had no effect, or has helped sustain the American economy. That is to say has an increased concentration in the top 1% increased or decreased the economic well being of the country. There has been debate over the role of progressive taxes, which is taxes that are directly proportional to income earned, in the combatting income inequality. Finally, a question that often is central to the debate on income inequality is whether labor markets naturally create imbalance in wages.

Our current income tax system today is very complex, unfair, inhibits saving, investment and job creation, imposes a heavy burden on families, and weakens the integrity of the democratic process. It can't be fixed and must be replaced. The U.S. income tax code is a long and complex system. The income tax system is so complex; the IRS publishes 480 tax forms and 280 forms to explain the 480 forms. The IRS sends out eight billion pages of forms and instructions each year. The administrative costs of the tax system far exceed those borne directly by the IRS. Each year Americans devote 5.4 billion hours complying with the tax code, which is more time than it takes to build every car, truck, and van produced in the U.S.

Pretty much everyone would agree that our current tax system is almost comically complicated, and that it is difficult if not impossible to accurately enforce. Despite evidence that the top 5% of earners pay about 60% of the income tax, many Americans readily believe that there are a

"Lower income taxes for all, with the greatest help for those most in need. Everyone who pays income taxes benefits - while the highest percentage tax cuts go to the lowest income Americans. I believe this is a formula for continuing the prosperity we've enjoyed, but also expanding it in ways we have yet to discover. It is an economics of inclusion. It is the agenda of a government that knows its limits and shows its heart." -President George W. Bush1

1. What is a progressive tax system? How does it differ from a regressive tax system?

First, to understand the effects of a flat tax and how it compares with our current system, it is important to know what it is. “A flat tax is a tax system, which refers to a tax on household income, taxes at a uniform rate, regardless of income level” (Meehan, 2016). This means that every individual in the nation would pay the same rate regardless of what they earn. A progressive tax, on the other hand, is based on an individual’s income and when their income increases, so do their taxes (The Economic Times, 2016). Under this system, the rich pay more and the low-income earners pay less. At present, this has caused some very big issues including a widening gap in our social ladder and an uproar over where the majority of the country’s wealth resides. These problems are the reason that government officials are seeking out new options. However, the flat tax alternative is less progressive and for many reasons.

In a Progressive Tax system, a larger percentage of income is taken from those who are wealthy or have a large annual income, in taxes. Those who have low incomes do not have as high tax percentage to pay because progressive tax is based on

In order to provide society with “fairness” every individual must be taxed at the same percentage

Policy makers have introduced a solution to the staggering proportion of taxes that Americans spend. The flat tax, based on an idea developed by Professors Robert Hall and Alvin Rabushka of Stanford University to create a fair, simple, and pro-growth tax system (Mitchell 1, 11). There are four basic criteria that make up a flat tax. First is a single low rate on taxable income, the baseline for taxable income would be raised to a certain amount dictated by a personal exemption. Second is simplicity, all Americans would fill out the same postcard-sized form to pay their taxes. Third is the reduction or elimination of deductions, credits, and exemptions, depending