Proposition 62 Research Paper

The voting age should be increased to 19 or 21 years of age. Most 18 year olds have just graduated or are still in highschool, so many of them are immature,and lack life experience. In addition, many 18 year olds do not have a plan(s) after high school, so if they can’t make a decision about their future what makes people think that they can make an informed decision about the future of the country. However, there are some states like Ohio that are allowing seventeen year olds to vote in primaries.

According to crimevictimsunited.org, Measure 11 passed with a two-thirds majority in November of 1994, and was first implemented on April 1st, 1995. While this bill had good intentions there have been, in my opinion, some serious side effects. Before Measure 11 was in place, a judge could look at each case on a case-by-case level. A judge used to have the ability to look at the circumstances that came with each case, and was able to actually judge each case accordingly. However, since judges must follow Measure 11 to the T, that power has been taken away from them. Also, due to this bill, juveniles ages 15 and up can be sentenced under the guidelines of Measure 11. That means that once a teenager turns 15 and commits one of the Measure 11 crimes he or she can be charged as an adult and get a mandatory minimum sentence regardless of their criminal history and the circumstances involved with their case. In reality, this is a “One Strike and You’re Out” approach, which is only adding to our problems.

The purpose of the following paper is to explain California’s Proposition 21. This writer will explain the pros and cons about this proposition; as well as what voters voted for when they chose “yes” for this proposition. Research will be done in order to explain what the reasoning for Proposition 21, and the changes that occurred when it enacted in the State of California. The following information will be provided as well; prosecution of juveniles in adult court, juvenile incarceration and detention, changes in juvenile probation, juvenile record confidentiality and criminal history, gang provisions, and serious and violent felony offenses. In addition, the following paper will also explain the impact under this proposition

Recently the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment sent out this shocking letter to parents statewide:

I am going to be writing about House Bill 375. House Bill 375 is a law which allows citizens the right to either open carry without a license to carry permit. As of The Legislative Budget Board in Austin Texas (2017) “The bill would amend chapter 30 and 46 of the penal code to provide that a person who is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing a firearm shall not be required to obtain any license to carry (LTC) a handgun as a condition for carrying a handgun. The bill would also remove the penalties associated with possession of a handgun without an LTC, provided a person is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing a handgun. The democrats are saying it is a very unnecessary law. The republicans are saying Texans shouldn’t be forced to pay just to exercise their Second Amendment right. I am going to touch base on both issues with a few examples.

Aside from school funding and protecting Children’s Healthcare, Proposition 55 will also maintain low taxes for families whose income is low. Proposition 55 will only keep higher taxes on the rich because as many say, they are able to afford it. According to Protecting California, these high taxes will only “apply to singles that make $250,00 and couples who make $500,000 or more a year.” (Protecting California) This shows that it really does only tax higher to those who really are able to afford it. Voter’s Guide is also stating how it will, “Only affect the wealthiest Californians who can most afford it, ensuring they continue to pay their share of taxes.” (Voters Guide) Ergo meaning that, the high taxes being taxed will indeed be paid because

The topic that I will be investigating is the legalization of Marijuana by California Proposition 19. Proposition 19 was on the 2010 ballot in November. It would have legalized for any individual over the age of 21 to possess up to an ounce of marijuana, just like alcohol. Marijuana has been viewed as bad since the 1920’s, even planting,

This November, “Mary Jane” may become legalized in California. “California Proposition 64, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative, will be on the November 8, 2016, ballot in California as an initiated state statute...A "yes" vote supports legalizing recreational marijuana for persons aged 21 years or older under state law and establishing certain sales and cultivation taxes (“California Proposition 64”). Experts are worried about how the passing of this proposition may negatively affect California students. They’re concerned because they’ve heard about “Mary Jane’s” bad reputation. After she was legalized in Colorado in 2013, the number of students using marijuana increased and academic performance declined (Colwell and “The Legalization

Although Proclamation 455/2005 envisages that valuations will eventually be carried out by certified private or public institutions or individuals, it also states that until such time as institutions of private or public nature, as well as individuals with the required capacity/ability become available, the valuations will have to be made by committees to be established under Article 10 of the proclamation or by owners of utility lines as provided under Article 6 of the same

It would change how cases are handled by ruling out crimes such as prostitution as evidence if the conduct can be proven that it was forced during the human trafficking of the victim. Currently, women charged with prostitution cannot be treated as victims of sex trafficking. This Catch-22 prevents the prosecution of the people who force victims into prostitution in the first place. The bill would also make the evidence of sexual conduct of the victim to attack the victim’s credibility or character unacceptable in court. Lastly, the measure would disallow certain defenses in court that have to do with minors such as stating you did not know that the victim was under the age of eighteen.

Proposition 62 and 66 addressed whether the the death penalty should be abolished or reformed. The pro 62 and anti 66 side argued that hardly any executions have taken place despite the 5 billion dollars that have been poured into the program or millions every year. Combined with these specific fiscal amounts, the pro side also stated that there actually have been only thirteen actual deaths from this program. Through this tactic of giving numerical values to show to ineffectiveness on the program and the burden it is putting on taxpayers, the pro side strongly strengthened their case. Additionally, they gave their case moral backing by stating that the criminals are getting off easy and not being required to work to give back to both the families

We have all seen Proposition 65 warning labels in some products or areas. When we saw these labels, it made us think that the product or an area with it may cause cancer. It made us have a hard time making a decision on whether we buy a product or go to an area because it is a need product and there a risk of us get cancer when we used it. In fact, Proposition 65 requires businesses to place warning labels when there is a cancer-causing substance in their products which said, “This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, and other reproductive harm.” The purpose of Proposition 65 is to have Californians to make a healthier decision and protects them from exposing to cancer-causing

In order to receive the death penalty you must first be convicted of the crime by the jury. The jurors are not allowed to discuss a case with members from outside of the jury, the only time jurors are allowed to discuss the case is inside the court. Nevertheless, the jury does end up being tampered with that results with innocent people being wrongfully convicted by twelve complete strangers who got together and decided to kill another human being. Ultimately, individuals are pressured into pleading guilty and must face the unfortunate predicament they are in. Samuel R. Gross in the article “The staggering number of wrongful convicts in America”, shines the light to the false confessions issue explaining, “…they were given a take-it-or-leave-it, for-today-only offer: Plead guilty and get probation or weeks to months in jail.

Although there are some cases that a criminal can commit a crime and still get away with any death penalty consequences. In some cases the convict could plead for insanity or also beg for their life and some rare occasions they are found not guilty by reason of insanity. For an example in an article back in 2012 a doctor by the name of Ruth Johnson gives example of cases of people who pleaded for insanity. “A Texas mother who admitted to killing her

The bill aims to amend Republic Act 9344, the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act, passed six years ago.