Pros And Cons Of 2016 Elections

Nevertheless if one is voting he or she has to make a choice between what political party will best

The purpose of elections is to allow the people to voice their opinions on who they wish should hold public office in the government. Whichever candidate has the most votes, win the election.

The election of 1860 and 2016 divided our country. There are some similarities and differences, but both elections had the same effect. Each point in time had problems, and each candidate had a different point of view on how to solve these problems. The people who are voting for our future president need to have some background information, so that’s what I’m going to give to you. Hopefully after reading this, you will be sure the person you’re voting for is right for the country.

In conclusion, all the office holders are a good candidate as they have enough education and working

establishes a new way of voting, without being in the majority of voter’s attention, by still

In opposition to most states, Texas is one of a handful to do partisan elections to vote for judges. Contrasting viewpoints try to decide on whether the voting system should be partisan or nonpartisan bringing much debate in the election of the judicial candidates. Some argue the system should change because of possible bias both by the electorate and of the judge, others contend it is necessary to know what party the judges affiliate with in order to know what way they lean may lean in their final judgement. Many arguments bring to light the benefits and drawbacks of each system, critiquing the justness, dependability, and impartiality.

For many years since 1879 citizens of the United States wait in line to vote for the next great president who will help the country stand tall for another four years. But the mistake doesn’t lie in who you vote for, but what you are voting for and supporting. We sometimes ask ourselves, “what does each party do?” or “what are their beliefs for our country?”

Proponents say the voting method ensures that whoever is elected has the support of a majority of voters. They say this helps increase civility because candidates need to appeal to a spectrum broader than just their base in order to win over their opponents’ supporters on subsequent ballots. And theoretically it eliminates the possibility of a “spoiler” candidate winning.

Unless we want this country to be under a constant spiral of deterioration we must elect a candidate who will be good for us due and remember where the power lies in America, that being the common man. Democracy is power to the people, and excluding impoverished and uneducated from voting blocks does not represent that. This country was founded on the grueling hardships of those who, today, would not be considered as elite and therefore would not have been given the right to vote. We must not take privileges from those who built today's civilization. As a debtor farmer, the man I want running my country is Andrew Jackson, who will in turn give me my deserved rights. I support him fully in his policies of Indian removal and in the distrust of

Take two minutes of your life to learn about another option for the November election. I personally have no idea who I am voting for, I don't care who you are voting for, but I do ask you to take a few minutes and make sure you give everyone a chance and verify that their views co-inside with those that matter to you. If someone that you want to see doesn't make it on the November ballot, you can always write in their full legal name as to make your vote count.

America is at a crossroads. Who should we vote for - the people the parties want or for our own candidate? Let 's say you decide to vote for Donald Trump but the Republican Establishment says not to vote for him and to vote for someone they endorse. Now you may be thinking, “I am a Democrat and wouldn’t vote for Donald Trump anyway.” This also applies to Bernie Sanders. The Democratic Establishment does not want Bernie Sanders to be President either. America is left with the choice of giving in and doing what the parties want or making a stand and voting for someone the parties will not

Once the chosen candidate makes it to office it is very crucial on them to uphold or give the citizens what is needed or asked upon in change. During the

Election season is here and there are some difficult decisions for voters to make. Personally, this researcher finds both of the potential candidates – Clinton and Trump – unfit to lead our country, and would prefer to vote for a third party candidate. However, this researcher believes a third party candidate will not win and would much rather vote for the lesser of the two evils, hopefully keeping the worst possible candidate out of office. Based on this conviction, the republican candidate – Donald Trump – appears to be the lesser evil out of the two presidential candidates.

The coming 2016 Congressional election is extremely important to both parties, however it is most crucial to the Democrats as they look to regain Legislative control in the Senate. Fortunately for them, they have a slight advantage as there are twenty-four Republican seats open opposed to the ten of their left leaning counterparts. However, in the House, they will have to take 30 seats to secure a majority, which will prove to be a far more difficult task. Yet, there is another advantage that could spin the votes in the party’s favor, the national Presidential election. Since there will be higher voter turnout among more liberal leaning demographics, such as college students, that would otherwise skip the ballots. Although the real struggle

My challenge to everyone is to do your homework before voting. Don't just "wing it" and purely vote based on name recognition or what party is listed by someone's name.