Pros And Cons Of A Universal Healthcare System

Also, everyone would be equal, no one would have better health care. This would help people and it would pretty much be a peacemaker. But since everyone has health care, people would go to the doctor for reasons that aren?t as important as others. This would also mean the wait for check-ups, surgeries, and visits at the hospital would be extremely long. ?Health tourists? fly to countries such as India, Turkey, Hungary, Germany, Malaysia, Poland and Spain to have surgeries performed without a wait. Doctors estimate that by the end of the decade, patients in Britain would be flying to places as far as South Africa and South America to have surgeries performed. People seem to be willing to pay extra money to be cured. Many patients in America say they would have died waiting to have their surgery. People like Donald Hilgendorf tell those wishing for universal health care to be careful. His doctor told him he should have a very serious and life-threatening surgery. He thought about what he should do and decided to get a second opinion and asked another clinic. They said he shouldn't do the surgery. He later found out that someone went ahead with the surgery and they died within months. So if there was universal health care in the country, no one would be able to get a second opinion. And thanks to a second opinion, a man lived.

Universal healthcare in the U.S. would be a bad idea for the reason that the government would have to spend more money, which means that the American people would have to pay higher taxes than we already do. In the U.S.A. the public pays $4,103.82 per person and the private cost per person is $4,609.18 which put together is more than $8,000.00 dollars per person.If you are to have universal health care in America government spending would have to increase. But you can't just take a country where the government spends about 47% of the health care cost in the U.S. to a single-payer. Universal health care, government spending would have to increase and if government spending increased taxes would be higher.

           Although there are many positives that go along with universal health care, there are negatives aspects as well. Some of the cons include longer wait times, caps on provider costs, and care that is unequally distributed. First of all, universal health care puts treatments in order based on priority. This means that those with conditions that are not life threatening get pushed back by those who are in urgent need of treatment. The outcome for many turn into long wait times. Along

"Universal healthcare refers to a healthcare system that provides benefits to all persons in a particular country." (Definition of "Universal Healthcare Coverage", Investopedia.com). This form of healthcare is used among the richest countries, Ex. Canada and France. Other rich countries that use the Universal Healthcare system spend far less than the United States does. Although the U.S spends more on healthcare, “The U.S ranks 28th below almost all other rich countries, when it comes to the quality of its healthcare assessed by UN parameters (pdf, p.13)"(Annalisa Merreli, A history of why the US is the only rich country without universal healthcare, qz.com). These statistics call for a change. The United States should adopt universal healthcare because it would benefit business, provide equal access to healthcare, and is a human right.

Here are some pros of having Universal Health. Having universal healthcare will save lives. Universal healthcare gives them health care and the basis that they need. This system is provided to all too all citizens and will not discriminate against race age

The discussion on whether the United States should implement the universal care has become a big controversial issue. Especially in the recent election it was the center of topic, candidates debated over the Obama care and whether they should change it or keep it. Few days ago, the new president introduce a new healthcare which still not fully implemented yet since they must wait for the senate vote but as for now it is on its way to becoming the new heath system in the united states. But is this what the United States need or should they rather try implementing a more efficient system.

Many Americans try to find reasons to why we may or may not have universal health care for all. Although the pro and cons list go on and on, it is understood that health care is and should be treated as a priority. It is a basic need of each person not only in the US but around the world. Despite gender, race, sexual orientation and most importantly age universal or single player health care is considered the best option for everyone. However, the debate amongst government officials is whether we employ a single player health care system or an overall universal health care system. Both systems would benefit Americans especially those who struggle to keep paying for a law that is required but maybe not so desired or financially beneficial for everyone. Being able to be realistic about this necessity becomes hazy even more so as the actual demand for professional medical associates and their services will surely increase, while the salary and compensation of those employed in this field will ultimately suffer.

Should the United States have Universal healthcare? Healthcare is a huge part of everyone's daily lives, from receiving check-ups, to acquiring care for medical emergencies such as cancer, or other things we can not control. Sadly, these services all cost an absorbent amount of money and a lot of insurance plans may not cover all services. Many people die from not receiving the proper medical care they need. High out of pocket expenses can force people into medical bankruptcies. These problems would not occur if the United States would have Universal Healthcare. Having Universal Healthcare will result in many benefits. Everyone would have access to the care they need, the government would pay for the services, and the services would still

Despite people’s fears that a universal healthcare approach would cost them more money, the truth is it would cut overall healthcare spending by billions of dollars yearly.

Another argument that deters the idea of Universal Healhcare is the increase on taxes and general cost to the average American. Yes, taxes will increase but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing when looking at the broad picture and future generations. Much like how our current taxes are being used for security, schools, libraries, parks, road safety and even wars, it may be to our benefit to have healthcare included. This idea provides us, Americans, with coverage ranging from a common cold to lengthy hospital

It is really hard to say whether or not Universal healthcare is a good idea. There are good and bad parts to this plan. It is hard to just get rid of it and start something new when so many people are currently taking advantage of the plan now. Everyone has the right to have healthcare, and we just need to figure out how everyone can afford it without it hurting the country.

Although it does mean that citizens will have medical coverage and financial protection. The coverage is not free. Before the healthcare laws were revisited and subsequently changed the uninsured often sought care and without the ability to pay that cost was taken by the insured. As a result this caused their premiums to rise. Having access to medical coverage would then encourage citizens to inquire about preventive measures. In doing so treatments would become less invasive if the illness is diagnosed in its early stages. Universal Healthcare is a moral and just obligation, by promoting the health of our citizens we then promote our infrastructure as well.

Having the Universal healthcare can decrease poverty. Not having it makes the medical field be a popular field many wants to join. Although there is a negative effect that comes with Universal healthcare, the good out weights the bad. More business can mean more imports and exports. The increase of business and working force will decrease U.S dept. Healthier people means a healthier country. I believe that everyone should have healthcare. Too many citizens in the U.S is without it. Deaths health problems could decrease in the lower class. The tax increase is a minor problem citizens will have to face with the universal care. It will be like saving up for something. You pay now to be covered

Firstly, offering universal programs will make sure that everyone gets the benefits they need; however, this can be seen as both a positive and negative outcome, depending on who it is effecting. The people who need it the most will get what they need. For example, the poor and working class needing free health care and other universal benefits, but the universal system also provides the middle class, upper middle class, and top 1% classes these same benefits even though they make a greater income than the poor and working class (Nelson, 2004). This could make it more costly for the government to provide these benefits, making it necessary to raise taxes, or to implement new taxes to pay for the program. It may even cause families that do need assistance to ask why the “rich” are getting the benefits without paying for them causing an uproar in the

A big argument against universal healthcare stems from the impatience and selfishness we embody as a society. For some people, long and dreadful wait times are the greatest socialism-induced evil possible. In a universal healthcare system, these extended wait times exist as the byproduct of giving everyone the equal opportunity to receive care. With more money going towards doctors and hospitals, it’s possible to cut back on these wait times but despite this it is still a more beneficial than not being able to receive a service at all. This happens in the United