Pros And Cons Of Abolish Death Penalty

In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know about the death penalty such as its pros and cons. While the innocent can be killed, the death penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have escaped from prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims’ families get justice and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the death penalty was very inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don’t make a right. Most people think that the defendant deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants’ family think?

The death penalty is still in use in the united states. The state with the most executions is in Texas with a total of 545 from 2017 to the year 1976 (Number of Executions, 2017). The death penalty is a very big debate. There are many reasons why and why people do and don’t like the death penalty.

Proposition 62 and 66 addressed whether the the death penalty should be abolished or reformed. The pro 62 and anti 66 side argued that hardly any executions have taken place despite the 5 billion dollars that have been poured into the program or millions every year. Combined with these specific fiscal amounts, the pro side also stated that there actually have been only thirteen actual deaths from this program. Through this tactic of giving numerical values to show to ineffectiveness on the program and the burden it is putting on taxpayers, the pro side strongly strengthened their case. Additionally, they gave their case moral backing by stating that the criminals are getting off easy and not being required to work to give back to both the families

The death penalty is a controversial topic that has been brought to the United States Supreme Court many times. According to the Oxford dictionary, the death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime . Usually the death penalty is administered for murder, attempted murder, or intent to kill. It started off being administered by hanging, but then evolved to the electric chair and is now administered through lethal injection. From 1940 to 2014, approximately 3,771 people have been legally executed in the United States. Throughout the years, many things have been determined about the death penalty. The first being that it violates human rights. The second is that innocent lives cannot be brought back. And the third is the large possibility of a biased jury. There have been many cases that support these three points which I will address later. So, based on Supreme Court rulings, the death penalty is unconstitutional and should not continue to be legal.

Still, many people are wrongfully executed and put into a death sentence row because an error of judgements and stereotypes based on a race especially for African Americans. “New research found that almost four percent of U.S. capital punishment sentences are wrongful convictions, almost double the number of people set free, meaning around 120 of the roughly 3,000 inmates on death row in America are not guilty” . It is ironic though, killing innocent people can be attributed to murder and the government is doing the same thing as other convicted criminals who were put into a death row. Example for a wrongful conviction, “Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Texas in 2004 for murdering his three young daughters by setting his house on fire”. But, after his execution multiple fire science experts reviewed the case and “released a report admitting that Willingham’s conviction was based on flawed science” . Willingham was b wrongfully convicted by the government because of their mistake. Wrongful execution was common before technology was developed. It was hard to find the evidence and people made mistakes during the investigation. If there was no Death Penalty, Willingham might have been still alive claiming for his

Capital punishment (the death penalty) is a legal procedure which is known as the most severe punishment where the law authorizes execution as a punishment for criminals (Gerald, 2008). Many people claim that allowing such a punishment will help decrease the crime rate, and also give closure to the victim’s family, but if you as American citizens analyze this situation in more detail you can see that taking a life for taking a life is more of a personal matter than justice. When comparing the states that allow capital punishment with the states that have abolished it, the crime rate does not differ. Hence, those who argue that death row has a positive effect on making criminals

The American judicial system is not perfect, and its flaws sometimes bare adversely on the people of this society. For instance, just because someone is labeled a criminal, does not always necessitate the fact that they are a criminal. Brian Gilmore argues this point when he mentioned that within the past 30 years, 102 innocent individuals have been acquitted from death row in America. He says that those individuals were either not released due to legal technicalities or because evidence was lost. “These men and women did not commit their crimes. Yet somehow, they were arrested, convicted, and sentenced to die, and some came awfully close to execution” Gilmore claimed. Unfortunately, it seems as though mistakes such as this one occur far too often; then, they eventually go unnoticed as we forget that those people, criminals or not, are human just like us. Considering the large window of feasible error associated with the death penalty, it is best that Americans make every effort to eliminate the intentional practice of capital punishment on criminals.

Many times the major question is do those convicted of a crime deserve to die or whether the state deserve to kill them. In other words what purpose would it serve by killing the person? What rehabilitation could they do if they are dead? This is one of the questions facing the justice system. Although the answer is not an easy one, it requires some thought and negotiation between the justice system and the state in order to determine the answer for each state. Each state must look hard and long at its financial situation as well as what is legally, morally and sometimes politically right.

One controversial issue in the modern world is the death penalty, to keep it or to ban it is the question. In the United States, the death penalty is given to people convicted of capital crimes. These crimes include, but are not limited to, murder, espionage, treason, and death after an aircraft hijacking. Capital crimes do, however, vary by state. There are many different stances on this issue. Banning it, not banning it, adding different limitations, etc. One common stance is the death penalty should be banned in the US. There are pros and cons of the death penalty, however, the cons outweigh the pros.

Capital punishment is necessary in several occasions in the United States for various reasons it brings justice and safety. By doing this act around the United States it will prevent future crimes from happening anywhere no one will have to worry about that individual committing a terrible act. Look at Ted Bundy for example a serial killer that killed over thirty-six women around the United States but several individuals thought he killed more than one hundred women. He was executed in the electric chair in 1989 in Florida. Either way it will cost a lot to keep a prisoner for life in prison and cost a lot for a person in death row as well but cheaper. A person on the death penalty is cheaper than a person who is in prison for life without parole because even though it cost a lot for a person on death row, life in prison is a lot higher because of food, healthcare and other cost for maintaining a healthy individual. As more inmates start showing up the problem becomes bigger with money and space.

The death penalty is the the “punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.” (Google.com) The death penalty has been around for about 400 years now. The death penalty originated in virginia in 1605 by Captain George Kendall. The death penalty itself is a very controversial topic and many people have different [points of view on it. Within this essay will be the main parts ion why the death penalty is the worst thing that has come to the United States.

The death penalty, it has been the argument of ethics and politics, yet there has never been an agreement on whether to abolish it or not. It has been part of the US history as well as the world history; its practice was show through cruel actions and has become the current lethal injection. It is the debate that never ends and will never end. In this debate called “Abolish the death penalty”, Diann Rust- Tierney and Barry Scheck argue for the abolishment of the death penalty, while Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger argue against the abolishment of the death penalty. Diann Rust- Tiereney, the executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, begins her debate by trying to prove that the death penalty is

Though personally I believe that the death penalty should be abolished, I found myself indecisive on who was making better points during this debate. The pro position, who argued in favor of abolishing the death penalty, and the con position, who argued in favor to keep the death penalty both shared well developed points that left me confused as well as uncertain as to what I myself believe in, considering the power the panelists persuasion had on me. Whether you personally believe in the abolishment of the death penalty or not, when the panelist talk about innocent lives being taken, you have to admit that your stance on this topic is questioned, even at the slightest. And on the other hand, your stance must also be questioned when the

In his previous visit, Pope Francis “called to end the death penalty.” He believed that it abolishes the Fifth commandment’s value and Thou shall not kill has absolute value and concerns both the innocent and the guilty” as he mentioned in his Sunday Angelus last February 21, 2016 (Long-Garcia 2016). Father Ponnet, pastor of Saint Camillus, and his team of death penalty abolitionists congregated appeals and alternatives to the death penalty. Then, these signatures would be brought for a ballot measure in November to reject the capital punishment in California.

Since the foundation of our nation the Death Penalty has been a way to punish prisoners that have committed heinous crimes, however since the turn of the 20th century the practice of Capital Punishment has been questioned on its usage in America and the world as a whole. The Death Penalty is used in America to punish criminals who have committed murders, or taken the life of an innocent person, and while the death penalty seems like it is doing justice to those who have killed others it is actually being used improperly in most situations, while also hindering our economy and is a means of ending more lives than necessary. The Death Penalty can be a valid source of punishment for criminals in the US however due to the misuse of this power by the government it is a huge detriment to our nation and the people that inhabit it. Because of the fact that Capital Punishment is used unfairly, and ineffectively in our nation it is an obsolete form of punishment and should have no place in the United States justice department.