Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Although there have been significant medical breakthroughs based in animal testing and experimentation, animal testing is a poor method of science as it is largely useless and

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Animal tests while have been successful in the past, more than likely won’t lead to successful transition into humans. Being used in medical research for years animals have led to some successes and scientific breakthroughs, but most of the time end up failing and hurting the animals instead of helping humans. Studies by the Food and Drug Administration found that about 92 of 100 drugs that passed the animal tests had failed in humans (“Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing,” 2017). Humans have become very developed medically over the last hundreds of years or so. To become more advanced has come with a drawback, harming millions of innocent animals. Most of the time when doing these types of research we end up finding something that would work or barley work in animals but will never work in humans.

Throughout the years the use of animals in medical research has been a hot debate around the world. Although animal testing may be cruel and inhumane, thousands of humans are saved thanks to the research that animals supply researchers with. Animals testing have taken over our knowledge of medicine and treatments to a whole different level. Animal testing also does this in a cheap and effective way. Without animals testing out knowledge wouldn’t be up to date, in other words animals’ testing is good.

For many years, the field of science has used animals in medical experiments worldwide, because of this innocent animals are being killed everyday. They are being tested with new drugs, new treatments, and by many makeup companies. Connecticut recently celebrated the passage of the “Beagle Freedom Law”, a law that requires laboratories to work with charities and rescue groups to find homes for research cats and dogs. Animals are being tested so humans do not have to be but animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings, although animals are the closest thing to humans. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of innocent animal subjects. Over 100 million animals suffer a year from testing. Testing animals is a lot more expensive than alternative methods and it is wasting government research dollars. Animal testing is not only a bad idea, but it is also inhuman and it should not be tolerated. The FDA should stop allowing animal testing. An animal does not give out the same results on a test than a human would.

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

It is estimated that each year over 100 million animals in the United States are used for animal testing (ProCon.org, 2017). This is unlikely an underestimate as it is impossible to receive a correct count worldwide. Thousands of animals are to be euthanized from the complications they endure from testing. Animals are used to test scientific developments and commercial products. New medical and non-medical experiments are tested on animals to verify the harmfulness of new medications or the safety of a product that will be used on humans. Although the importance of animal testing brings more medical advancement over the years using fewer humans in experiments, it is still an expensive way of researching inaccurate results and at the same time, it is a practice of animal cruelty.

There is no reason for animal testing when 92 percent of the tests fail in humans. Such as, Richard Klausen, former National Cancer Institute Director, states “We have cured mice of cancer for decades - and

Thousands of animals are hurt and even killed because of animal testing every year. Scientists use animals of all kinds, apes, mice, rabbits, cats, etc. to experiment on. These experiments range from giving them drugs, to see what effect they might have on humans, to testing what extreme heat would do to the human body. The outcome of these experiments are often harm and even death. Animal testing is not morally justified because it causes harm to live animals, there are suitable alternatives to animal testing, and there are too many differences between humans and animals to be able to call the outcome “Accurate”.

It has been proven that “animal research has played a vital part in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade” states Understanding Animal Research, an advocacy group that aims to demonstrate the need for humane animal research. Animal testing acts as a huge help to the well-being and health of

If the test results are not giving us correct answers then why do we continue to put our money into the research? When it comes to testing animals, there are multiple costly thing that are needed, for example, money is needed for an institution, feeding and housing the animals for many months, and the most expensive need, the drugs being used in the experiments. (Klazema, June 13, 2014.) Also, the animals are becoming very expensive because most of them are specifically bred for certain tests. American author and clinical researcher Dr. Neal Barnard M.D. made a very good point when he said, “Not only are the studies themselves often lacking face value, but they also drain badly needed funds away from patient care needs.” With this statement he is simply saying that people are wasting their money when they test animals (Murnaghan, November 7, 2016). One way in which we can prevent all of this wasteful time, money, and animal lives, is to come up with an alternative for animal testing. These alternatives are much more reliable, resemble actual humans more accurately, and are less expensive, so we can stop wasting government money. With today’s technology, animals are not the perfect solution for finding cures for diseases or testing the safety of cosmetic products. Some scientists have interest in testing that does not use a whole animal. Possible alternatives could be animal organs, animal or human cells, or computer modeling. The future of testing is also looking to use less complex organisms like bacteria, flies, or even plants because they are lower in moral standings than animals (Liou, July 6,

Millions of animals suffer and die unnecessarily each year as they become subjects for medical testing and other horrendous experiments. Although some people believe such activities are necessary to progress in medical research, in reality it does very little to improve human health and development. For decades, drug and chemical safety assessments have been based on laboratory experimentations involving rabbits, dogs, rodents, and other animals. Consequently, nine out of ten drugs proven safe and effective in animals fail when given to humans. Animal testing is unreliable and unnecessary and there are more effective research methods out there that do not come at the expense of innocent animals ' lives.

Around 100,000 to 200,000 animals are suffering and dying from makeup testing yearly OR In 2013, India abolished mandatory cosmetics testing on animals. There are places such as Israel, India and the European Union which have banned cosmetics testing on animals. On the other hand, there are countries like the United States and China that still allow makeup testing on animals. Many organizations and groups are trying to find alternatives to help end cosmetics testing on animals. There have been about 50 non-animal tests that have already been authorized. A wide variety of animals are tested on. Some of the more common animals that are tested on can include mice, rabbits, rats, and guinea pigs. Cosmetics testing on animals is a very

Needles, knives, burns, hives, rashes, and scratches; what does this sound like to you? To me it sounds like horror movie full of torture and pain. In reality, that is what animals have to endure on a daily basis. In North America, there are no bans on animal testing for cosmetic purposes. Which means, animals have to be poked, scratched, burned and tortured so that we can benefit from the products it produces. As stated by Suzi who runs a blog based on cruelty free cosmetics, in all of the makeup companies in the world, a total of 87 companies are cruelty free (2016). This is quite a large number, but it is definitely not large enough. Most of the makeup brands that are sold in Shoppers Drug Mart, a very common pharmacy across Canada, are

The way an animals body and structure was made is very different from that of a human one, which causes the test results to be unreliable to be used for a human being. It has been proven that more than seventy-five percent of the drugs that are safe for animals to use are not effective for a person to use, they are actually dangerous for people. In contradiction, some people say that an important factor in finding a medical cure for diseases is by testing on animals to see if their ‘cure’ will actually work or not, they do not feel the need to have human trials because they rather kill animals than kill people. Studies show that the only animal that has the deoxyribonucleic acid, commonly referred to as the DNA, even remotely close to ours is a chimpanzee but they cannot be tested on due to the Animal Warfare Act (AWA). The AWA was the first law in the United States where scientists had to control the usage of animals for research.