preview

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Decent Essays

Should Animal Experimentation Be Allowed? “Three baby mice found sealed alive in a plastic baggie and left unattended on a laboratory counter…” (Guillermo, Kathy). How is that kind of cruel laziness suppose to determine whether or not our medicine is safe? I believe animal testing is an unproductive form of experimentation that should not be legal. Animal experimentation is used every day in laboratories like the University of California at Davis Center for Neuroscience, known for the unattended mice, to observe symptoms that may occur in organisms when exposed to numerous products. Initially, animal testing brought hope for cures from horrendous and fatal diseases. Now, all animal testing does is waste the lives of innocent creatures for …show more content…

The draize eye test is what tests the irritability of cosmetics in the eyes of its consumers. First, rabbits are weakened through starvation and then their eyelids are held open with clips for multiple days preventing them from blinking away the burning substance. Can a human even imagine the intensity of pain that rabbits forced into the procedure face? After these procedures, most animals are exterminated by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, and decapitation. There are several statistics founded that help us understand the issue. “97,153 animals suffer without anesthesia - 1,395 primates, 5,996 rabbits, 33,652 guinea pigs, and 48,015 hamsters.” This isn’t the last shocking epidemic of cruelty shown towards animals shown in the United States (ProCon.org). On March 2009, the Humane Society of the United States found 338 violations of the Animal Welfare Act at the New Iberia Research Center in Louisiana. Primates who had suffered psychological stress were found self mutilating themselves by tearing gaping wounds in their arms and legs. Suicide is one of the most profound tragedies in our culture, yet we find it ok to expose living creatures to experimentation which causes so much psychological damage that they commit suicide. Animal experimentation is not only cruel and inhumane but is also hypocritical. …show more content…

Animals have many anatomical, metabolic, and cellular differences when compared to humans. Thomas Hartung, a toxicology professor at John Hopkins University, argued for alternatives to animal experimentation because “We are not 70 kg rats.” In the 1950’s, an epidemic occurred caused by the animal tested sleeping pill called thalidomide. Over 10,000 babies were born with severe deformities, yet all mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters passed it. The arthritis drug Vioxx which had protective effects on the hearts of mice had caused 27,000 sudden cardiac deaths and heart attacks before being pulled from the market. If this is not enough evidence to prove animals are not like humans anatomically, let us look at some more evidence (ProCon.org). Based on the National Academy of Sciences, a 2013 study states that nearly 150 human clinical trials for treatments that reduce inflammation failed, but the trials were successful in animals. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, ninety-four percent of drugs that pass animals tests fail in human clinical trials. In addition, over one-hundred stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals have failed in humans. Finally, approximately 85 HIV vaccines failed in humans after working well in non-human primates. Consequently, thousands of human lives have been ended or damaged due to the unreliability of animal testing and how the drugs will react in a human body. Animals aren’t

Get Access