Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Animal testing is not only beneficial to human but also animals, at least to those who are not used in the experiments, such as pets and endangered species. Along with researching for new treatments and medicines for

Animal testing is crucial because without it, scientists might never find developments for biomedical research. Worldwide, there are millions of diseases that create devastation in countless families. However, there are vaccines, cures, and processes that scientists have came up with to help fix this problem. How fast and efficiently they come up with these treatments is the difference in many lives saved. Animal testing has been proven to speed up the process of collecting research

Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the millions of animals that are tortured or killed during the process of these painful, deadly experiments. Many people seem to misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are executed on the animals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and harmful. Luckily there are more humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive.

Although animals testing help humans in many ways it can be cruel and inhuman to the animals being tested on. Depending on which lab the end up in they could be treated poorly and starved. They could be “inflicted with burn wounds and pain to test for a healing process” (Brown, 2017). This is cruel and just wrong for many reasons. “When testing to evaluate irritation caused by

Testing on animals is inhumane and strongly unfair. The animals that are chosen have no voice and are unaware of what is going to happen to them once they enter the testing labs. The animals that the company decides to test on are usually stray or are from pounds (Judson). Chosen animals are forced fed, locked up in kennels for long periods of time, and are severely wounded (Judson). There are many different types of tests that are done on the animals. The Draize Eye Test is considered one of the most cruel tests (Procon.org) . The test has the chosen rabbits hold

Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. The use of animals for scientific testing should not continue because animal testing can be cruel, some animals aren’t protected by law, and there are alternative testing methods.

Regardless of the type of testing that is being held on the animals it is not something we would perform on a human being. An animal may be close to a human but not as close as some would like to believe they are. The harsh chemicals and pain inflicted would hurt an animal in the same way a human feels pain. The ugly truth is what the world has turned their back to. There are alternatives to these tests and it is time they are used. Animal testing is inhumane and pointless because we cannot correlate the effects of products on animals with those of humans due to our physiological

“An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united states for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon.org). We are rapidly using up the earth’s supply of small animals. “A 2011 poll of nearly 1,000 biomedical scientists conducted by the science journal Nature found that more than 90% agreed that the use of animals in research is essential (ProCon.org). Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked up in cages and are getting killed for scientific tests to create products and medicines. Thus, animal testing is cruel and inhumane to be experimenting on animals, there are alternative methods available to researchers to replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

There are many reasons why animals should not be used for experimentation. In the article, “Animal testing is outdated, imperfect”, Ryan Ballinger states, “ One thing i found is that alternatives exist,such as human cells or artificial skin” . This explains how we have the ability to test on different resources and alternatives . This reinforces that there are different ways to find medicine and cures for humans instead of making innocent animals

Animal testing has helped develop many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals and there are rules that prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Millions of animals are used each and every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. They are used to develop medical treatments, test the effects of medications, check the safety of products, and much more. Research on living animals has been practiced for many years and has provided many benefits to us.

Thalidomide is a medicine that is used for nausea. Many women who used it did not know that they were pregnant. Once they gave birth, they realized their child was severely deformed and ask how that could be? Scientists gave Thalidomide to pregnant rabbits and also gave birth

People say that animal testing is good for research. But what if alternative testing methods already exist? There are other ways to gather important research, then experimenting on animals. Kara rogers spoke of another way to test, other than on animals is to study cell structures in a petri dish. When people donate their blood doctors can use the cells from them. And we can now produce artificial

Around 100,000 to 200,000 animals are suffering and dying from makeup testing yearly OR In 2013, India abolished mandatory cosmetics testing on animals. There are places such as Israel, India and the European Union which have banned cosmetics testing on animals. On the other hand, there are countries like the United States and China that still allow makeup testing on animals. Many organizations and groups are trying to find alternatives to help end cosmetics testing on animals. There have been about 50 non-animal tests that have already been authorized. A wide variety of animals are tested on. Some of the more common animals that are tested on can include mice, rabbits, rats, and guinea pigs. Cosmetics testing on animals is a very

while there are many controversial thoughts on many different factors that apply to animal testing, I find it to be that many of the pros outweighs the costs that comes animal testing such as the ethical or moral reason. Although when including the ethical or moral consequences that comes with animal testing, the benefits to mankind and improvements to our societies and sciences in many diverse ways. Which leads me to strive towards the many benefits that comes with animal testing even with some of the consequences that comes with the testing. Many people will jump to the conclusion that animal testing is always done in a harsh manner, how the morals and ethics have been the same since way back when, and how the outcomes that occur when testing on animals isn’t worth the chance of them getting hurt. Yet this is not the case.

Most animals that are used for testing aren’t genetically the same as humans, therefore making animal testing somewhat useless. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor test subjects for human beings. There are better alternatives than using animals as “guinea pigs.” Up to