Today’s society is focused on the affects of diseases on the human body, and how to prevent the side effects associated with the disease. The controversial topic of using animals as research subjects is highly debated of whether it is necessary to save lives or inhumane to the animals. Every year, animals are experimentally used to determine the effectiveness, side effects, toxicity and safety of medications. Personally, I was aware of the testing being done on animals, but did not know much about it, and was therefore indifferent in the debate. However, after doing research, I have come to the conclusion that the cons outweigh the pros and animal testing is inhumane.
Ultimately, animal testing for research purposes is cruel. According to Humane
A topic that will always be discusses the testing on animals Contributes to many cures and treatments that save many human lives.The majority of the medical breakthroughs that have happened in the last 100 years were direct results from animal research and experimentation.
Scientific research is always evolving, constantly progressing, improving and being modernised in order to reflect changes in social and cultural morals and values as well as to adjust to the relevant issues in the current society.
Animal testing has been the target of animal cruelty groups since the beginning of its existence, but the benefits it provides, humans and animals far greater than the type of method that is used to get the results. Scientists Karl Landsteiner’s success in finding a cure to polio is an example of how the benefits of animal testing helped better future human lives. In his experiments he discovered that Polio viruses had three variations, meaning that they would have to produce a product that could prevent all three. Also, they discovered that the virus enters the body through the mouth. With these to finding that the obtained through animal testing it was later possible to create a vaccine for polio that benefitted millions(Dilger).even
There are currently no strict laws that protect animals from testing. Every year millions of animals die for incomprehensible reasons. Animal testing has been a controversial problem in the United States as well as nationally. For centuries animals have been used as test subjects for medications and products used in daily life. They should not have to suffer in order to have decent medications and beauty products that mean no difference to them. Animal testing can be ended and replaced if this problem is recognized and addressed, companies are penalized, replacement subjects are found, and animal testing is made overall illegal.
Generally speaking, if you were to hear, “It's time for you to test a vaccine that may or may not be dangerous or even possibly fatal, for the sake of a different species.” It's understandable that the notion of this may make you feel uncomfortable. Nevertheless, this exact situation is what happens to animals across the world. One charged debate that has taken place for a long period, of time, is whether animal testing has a valid position, within, the field of health and medicine studies. There are two heavily opinionated sides within this conflict. There are those who feel Animal Testing is necessary for the future of medicine, then there are the people who believe that animal testing ( even though, perhaps once had a reasonable stand) no longer serves a purpose in health and medicine, believing animal testing to be ( for many people but not all) morally unacceptable and an outdated practice. Upon reflecting on the arguments brought before both sides of this debate, it can be concluded that animals should no longer be used to test on as it's ineffective and a waste of time.
This book was a really good source for two reasons. I used this source a lot in my paper not just quoting what the author said, but also using the case studies. The case studies helped me a lot because they usually worked as examples of abuse and neglect..The case studies helped me a out because, there was a lot of good ones that talked a lot about what exactly is happening in labs. They talk about a lot of stuff that people don't really know what's going on in the labs. This book also had a few really good quotes that I used. That is why this book was a really good source to use.
Around the world, there has been an enduring controversial issue and that is animal testing and research. Since the beginning of medicine, animals were used in the testing of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices to determine the safety of a product due to their similarities in diseases with humans. However this is considered unnecessary due to the creation of alternatives for animal testing. Despite these alternatives the majority of animal testing still has not come to halt. This issue deserves to be attentive to instead of turning a blind eye as we consumers have always done dragging the issue and understand how our products are developed. The audience for this topic is generally people who are consumers of products and UTA students. In
Animal testing is appalling. Research on live animals has been around since at least 500 BC; people and scientists still think it isn’t such a bad thing.
Many of the products we use everyday are being tested on animals. Many don’t give a second thought to what is being done to these animals to produce these products. The animals that are being used for research are treated inhumanly and aren't given the proper care that they are suppose to be given by law. Many of the animal handlers take advantage of the fact that these animals can’t express how much pain that they are causing them when being used as test subjects or being kept in small cages. There are those that believe animals don’t have rights but little do they know that any living thing has as many rights as humans do. The Animal Welfare Act needs to be better implemented to combat animal cruelty because the current law is not being
“Three baby mice found sealed alive in a plastic baggie and left unattended on a laboratory counter…” (Guillermo, Kathy). How is that kind of cruel laziness suppose to determine whether or not our medicine is safe? I believe animal testing is an unproductive form of experimentation that should not be legal. Animal experimentation is used every day in laboratories like the University of California at Davis Center for Neuroscience, known for the unattended mice, to observe symptoms that may occur in organisms when exposed to numerous products. Initially, animal testing brought hope for cures from horrendous and fatal diseases. Now, all animal testing does is waste the lives of innocent creatures for
On the opposite side of the spectrum, supporters strongly argue a multitude of reasons why animal testing has been and will continue to be the best form of experimentation for upcoming products in the market. The first and most prominent reason is that testing on animals “has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments,” including medication for cancer, severe injuries, leukemia, and more (“Should Animals Be Used”). Not only do these medical advancements bring significant progress into the scientific field, but they are also the only adequate form of testing which fully reveals all the responses that would be mirrored in human beings. The pro side, as established by ProCon.org, commonly articulates that:
It is widely known animal testing injures and kills many animals each year for the sake of product development and scientific research. According to preventative medicine/public health specialist Aysha Akhtar, worldwide over 15 million animals are used in experimentation for medicine to be used on humans, and often suffer, even though alternatives to animal testing exist. Animal testing should no longer be practiced because it is unethical, the results can be misleading, and alternatives are available.
Based on Peta, an international animal protection agency, it was found that “more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories involving . . . medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing.” The United States’ controversy on animal testing is a debatable topic that varies based on multiple factors. In an article conducted by Viren Swami, a professor at Anglia Ruskin University, he expressed the concept of animal testing. Animal testing refers to the use of animals in experiments; this ranges from academic experiments, research, or commercial establishments (Swami, Viren 269). Swami also discussed the number of creatures that were tested upon. Based on his research, “. . . 3 million animals - from fruit flies to mice to non-human primates – are used annually in experiments, and may either be killed or subsequently euthanized . . .” (Swami, Viren 269). This goes to show that animal testing is a gruesome task in which the weaknesses of the topic outweigh the strengths. Hundreds of research and scientific experiments point to the fact that testing on primates in a laboratory is not beneficial to humans; the value of those species who are tested on are too valuable to nature.
Most companies use animals to test their products. There are different sides of the argument about companies doing animal testing. The two sides are the people who want it to stop since its against animal rights and it’s inhumane but the others say that it helps majorly with making medical breakthroughs on products and cures. “This topic first started around 400 B.C. and was used by Aristotle and Erasistratus” (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Today, millions of animals are being tested for human products, causing many to fall ill with disease and having no choice but to be experimented on. Animal Experimentation should be banned throughout the United States and other Countries. Animal Experimentation is a cruel and inhuman method of research, but would opponents prefer it is a necessary evil to experiment on animals?