Pros And Cons Of Argument Against Gun Control

The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ,while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them.Gun control laws are simply

Gun control laws should regulate production, distribution, ownership and use of firearms by civilians. Gun control laws are not intended to dispossess law abiding citizens of licensed firearms but to intervene on reckless use of firearms that cause harm to the public. Gun control should also make it difficult for criminals to access firearms. Armed civilians have in many instances deterred acts of crime from being instigated by scaring away criminals. Nonetheless, gun laws can only be described as immensely lax. This essay seeks to argue for the enactment of strict gun control laws by highlighting the dangers posed by guns in the hands of members of the public.

For many years there have been arguments over gun control, and if there needs to be more regulations or even ban them. I do not think that banning firearms or adding more regulations would help; if anything it would make things worse.

The issue over the interpretation of the Second Amendment still prevails as one of the most controversial issues in the United States. The Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The question at hand is the proper definition of a “well-regulated militia” and should there be restrictions on the obtainment of lethal weapons. Ever since the year of 1960, gun violence has increased, costing an average of 30,000 deaths in the United States (Gun Violence is a Serious Problem). This astronomical amount of unnecessary deaths will continue to rise if nothing is done to stop the serious epidemic that continues to plague our

Obviously to any opinion, there is an opposing viewpoint. Several United States citizens firmly believe that America is not in need of any kind of gun control. A lot of politicians argue that preventing gun-related crimes, such as suicide and mass-shootings, are impossible to predict and prevent. They argue that no matter what kind of regulations the government fights for, there is nothing anyone can do about the heinous gun-related crimes that occur daily in the United States. Another argument commonly made is about the weapons that shooters use that are not guns. Previous school shooters, like Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, were also armed with bombs that were set to go off inside of Columbine High School. People who argue that these shooters also had bombs fail to realize that the only fatalities that occurred on that fateful day in April were done by gunfire. Also, mass-shooters like the perpetrator of the Vegas shooting, Stephen Paddock, had over 23 semi-automatic rifles stored in his hotel room across from the concert venue where he committed his crimes. The evidence is clear that if someone wants to own a semi-automatic gun, or 23 in this case, they will make it happen. However, several people that knew Paddock when he was alive said that he was diagnosed with a mental illness, and with routine background checks, this horrendous crime could have been prevented. Another gun-rights argument is that criminals who choose to use guns in their crimes tend to not shoot up places where their victims are armed, like

Original: A study shows that “46% of gun owners report that their primary reason for owning a firearm is for protection against criminal victimization” (Wallace 158). This statistic is one main reason why gun control should be limited. If America were to take away the right to bear arms, nearly half of all people who own guns would lose their sense of security in their own home, town, and country. Esposito and Finley quote a policer office from 2013 saying “simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option” (86). This isn’t because the police force doesn’t do their job well, but because criminals in the twenty first century are merciless and don’t allow time for cops to come save the day.

The history of mankind has been predominantly influenced by the use of the various purposes of the manmade tool. From one’s first feeble steps as an infant one uses the sturdy aid of a table or chair to support oneself. As he progresses in age, one will use a variety of tools to aid and at times protect oneself from the many external factors that will plague one. In each civilization, from the Ancient World’s catapults and clubs to the nuclear and machine weapons that predominated the World Wars, history has been forged in the bloodshed of men, women, and children akin. From war to immediate survival humans have been dependent upon the use of these weapons, such as guns, to maintain order within their respective societies; but, after tragedies

The average response time of a 911 call is 10 minutes. The response time of a .357 magnum is 1400 feet per second. The second amendment of the United States Constitution states, “the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon.” That right is now more than ever in jeopardy and we must continue to fight for it. Gun Control does not solve our nations problem of violence.

this thing on gun control is getting blown out of the water people are for it and people arent im one of the people who is not for gun control. The 2ed amendment of the united states was set in 1791 to give the citizens the right to bear arms for protection of them self and others around them that are not protected. yes people theses days have took it over the boarder with all the school shootings in stuff but do you people who are for gun control really think that this is gonna stop people from getting weapons i mean come on now you already have to go there all kinds of paper work to even own a gun thats resterd to you. weapons are all over the place there is no way you going to stop people getting them all you're gonna do is piss off all the hunters and people who obey the laws. theres is only one way you could ever get all guns off the streets and thats to kill all the citizens and demolish the us and i bet even then they will still be on the streets.

Firearms are involved in the deaths of more than 30,000 people in the U.S this year. The “Issue Overview…” by bloomberg, has a perspective of a writer on the gun issue, and “Famous Speech” by Emma Gonzalez, has an inside look on the issue of guns because she was a victim of school shooting. The article “Famous Speech…” wants to get the word out that the government should take care of the gun control issue. Then, the article “Issue Overview…”, wants to discuss the problems with gun control. There goal for both is to tell one how horrible guns can be in general. The goal for “Famous Speech...”, is to spread the word about the gun issue from a student from the Florida shooting. Then, the goal for “Issue Overview…”, is to tell one what the situation

Some people are petrified of guns because they’ve been habituated to believe they are possessed of evil, and can only do evil. Choosing life by taking another’s may seem like a conflict or insincerity to the morally confused, but that is frequently the choice we are given in the endless crash of good and evil. We must meet evil with an overwhelming show of righteous force. The sociopathic actions are accomplish by people who reproduce the culture of devaluation which tolerance has brought us. The very first step is acknowledging that the root cause of all this killing is Terrorism, not easy access to guns, but the racist, powerful, supremacist ideology of Islam. The number of shooting death has risen proportionately in the past years. It is not a proper standard to

First, I believe that how guns are used is up to the person holding it. Guns can't do anything by themselves, it is the person who has the gun that decides where it shoots. Gun control will not stop or help to prevent violence; an aggressive person does not need a gun to be violent, there are many other ways for one person to hurt another person. Taking guns away from all people will not make the violent ones less violent. It may even make them more violent than they already are. Violent people will always find a way to be violent. Taking guns away from everyone does nothing to prevent people from the possibility of being hurt, robbed, and killed by others. I believe that gun control will not last as we have already had something similar to

Actually, guns should be controlled because of mass shooting. Some people might forgets what happened in some cities in the United States related to weapons. A recent event is the tragedy when a man killed nine people during a prayer meeting in the African American church in Charleston. He committed the deadliest attack on a place of worship in the United States in 24 years (Horwitz, du Lac, Bever and Costa, 2015). Furthermore, in Connecticut, there was a sad tragedy when a guy shot 20 children and other people at Sandy Hook Elementary school. Before he committed this horrible atrocity, he killed his mother who had firearms in her home. That illustrate having a guns at home is harmful even just for hunting (Stoller, 2013).

The Second Amendment states “you have the right to keep and bear arms”(Second amendment). But gun control is taking away this right. Gun Control activist say that “guns kill people” but people kill people. I feel that gun control is stupid because if the government takes away guns then the people that will illegally own guns are the bad people. Without a gun to use for self-defense a victim can be killed instantly without a chance to live.

Gun control is not needed, education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths ( “Top pro and con argument”). Learning about gun will keep other safe because gun don’t kill people, people kill people. Gun are not harmful if people use it the right way. Gun control should not be supported because it will not reduce lethal crime, reduce school violence, and reduce suicide.