Pros And Cons Of Assisted Reproductive Technology

Assisted reproductive technology includes all fertility treatments in which both egg and sperm are handled.

The topic of cloning has brought much debate in science and also in society. Many

Chile's health system has been evolving rapidly in recent years. The assigned role of the Chilean Medical Association has focused on medical ethics codes, and laws. Social organizations have emerged during the last decade and have been working together with the Chilean Fertility Society to change public health policies and attitudes in order to increase the access of people to modern reproductive technology. The current government has passed the August Law which decriminalizes abortion under three circumstances, the government also signed the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), which establishes safe healthcare as a human right.(6) “Today, women have won, democracy has won, all of Chile has won,” said Bachelet(2). On the other hand, Reproductive technology, assisted reproductive technology (ART), is utilized but faces opposition from factors of social-religious conservatism, and gender-based discrimination. While reproductive technologies can be accessed by those who can afford out of pocket funding, most of the population relies on public healthcare, resulting in less than 4% of the population receiving treatment.(5) In this sense, more research of reproductive technologies, specifically mitochondrial transfer, should be reliant on biomedical research of genetic on bioethical levels, as gene therapy is authorized only for the purpose of treating diseases or preventing their appearance(4). In this sense, the mitochondrial

In order for a parent to design their baby, they must take part in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). ART is technology that conducts procedures that will help to achieve a pregnancy (Definitions). One of these procedures, in vitro

ART has multiple methods such as in-vitro fertilization, surrogacy, and fertility medication. Wherefore, there are numerous ethical, social, and legal concerns that have emerged from this topic. The concern that takes priority over the others is ethics, for the reason that using bioethical principles is a method to determine whether an action is right or wrong. Any procedures of assisted reproductive technology are ethically wrong considering the principles of autonomy, divine command theory, and

Hammons, Stacy A. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Changing Conceptions of Motherhood?” Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, Vol.23, No.3, August 2008, pp. 270-280.

Another way that same-sex couples can become parents is through assisted reproductive technology. These technologies involve in vitro fertilization, intrauterine insemination, intracervical insemination, and the “do-it yourself” method. That being said, homosexuals should have the same access to these technologies that heterosexual couples do. Same-sex couples and couples with fertility issues struggle to have families. But the struggle does not end with reproductive technology. A lot of times a surrogate mother or a donor is involved. That makes it a three parent situation. Therefore, if a surrogate mother decides she wants to keep the baby then that just introduces a whole lot more drama in the parent’s life. Assisted Reproductive Technology

New technological advances and scientific methods continue to change the course of nature. One of the current controversial advances in science and technology is the use of genetically modified embryos in which the study exceeds stem cell research. Scientists have begun planning for research involving human embryos in the genetic modification field. Many technological developments are responsible for improving our living standards and even saving lives, but often such accomplishments have troubling cultural and moral ramifications (Reagan, 2015). We are already beyond the days in which virtually the only procreative option was for a man and a woman to conceive the old-fashioned way (Reagan, 2015). Genetic modification of human embryos can be perceived as a positive evolution in the medical process yet it is surrounded by controversy due to ethical processes. Because this form of genetic modification could affect later born children and their offspring, the protection of human subjects should be a priority in decisions about whether to proceed with such research (Dresser, 2004). The term Human Genetic Engineering was originally made public in 1970. During this time there were several methods biologists began to devise in order to better identify or isolate clone genes for manipulation in several species or mutating them in humans.

Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is a method that allows individuals the ability to biologically conceive a child. Individual’s who use the in vitro fertilization method has the opportunity to identify genetic defects in the embryos by using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PDG) . However, having this ability raises various ethical issues.

Assisted reproductive technology(ART) is a cycle of fertility treatments that includes in vitro fertilization and intrafallopian transfer (Sunderam et al., 2015).

Assisted reproductive technologies include any fertilization involving manipulation of gametes/ embryos outside the human body and transfer of gametes/embryos into the body. They offer biomedical parenthood to various infertile couples who have often spent years trying to have a child and have exhausted all other avenues to have a child of their own. The new reproductive technologies give great help to infertile couples and make many new reproductive arrangements possible. The possibilities available for couples contemplating parenthood in unconventional ways under new reproductive techniques are two-party and third-party assisted reproduction. Assisted reproduction can raise some ethical concerns such as - the selection of the sex, how to

In the article, the author Mark Walker addresses the question of whether Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis is beneficial to the embryo or not. PGD is a process that removes one or more blastomeres at the cell development stage from an embryo outside the womb. This determines the presence of disorders like Cystic Fibrosis, Huntington’s Disease, and Down syndrome. Even though PGD does not genetically alter embryos, it benefits them. Furthermore, It increases embryos’ chances for higher expected well-being when used for choosing EWD. While correlating to random selection, this is an advantage to the embryos nothing because it does not alter their selection for implantation. Thus, the author concludes that those who think eugenic selection has

In the long run, Catholic’s disagreed with IVF which began to spark controversy for multiple reasons. They considered IVF inherently wrong because it was unnatural, also saw it as an attempt by scientists to “take the Lord’s work into their own hands,” in the words of Pope Pius XII and replaced it with the divinely ordained means of making life with a technological process. God commanded our first parents to "Be fertile and multiply" (Genesis 1:28). Why? God Himself is fertile. Love always overflows into life. When the first mother brought forth the first child, she exclaimed, "I have brought forth a man with the help of the Lord" (Genesis 4:1). The help of the Lord is essential, for He has dominion over human life and is its origin. Parents

I don’t think it was a mistake to allow In vitro fertilization. Sure, they have leftover embryos, but there’s always a solution on how to best use them. I think the best solution for this case would be to donate the embryos for research, putting them up for adoption, or donated them for the embryonic stem cell collection. To me these are the best options because they allow the embryos to be used for something. Discarding them or keeping them in suspension seems to be a waste of good research material and possible future children. I can’t say I like the idea of implanting the embryos into mothers just so they can die naturally. The procedure must cost something, and I don’t think this much effort is necessary just to give the embryos a natural

Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) refers to the technology used to assist human reproduction for individuals who are infertile (inability to conceive after trying for at least 12 months). Assisted Reproductive Technologies are categorized as HardwareThere are a variety of assisted reproductive technologies that are used to help couples reproduce: