Pros And Cons Of Being Anonymous

Anonymous is an associated international network hacking group of activists and ‘hacktivists’ - . They became known for their attacks on governments, businesses and corporate websites. There are many reasons why Anonymous hack and expose different people, and companies. In today’s world there are many who consider hacking to be a job from which they gain money. These individuals are oftentimes behind some of the biggest corporations such as Apple, Microsoft, and Sony. The hacking system affects peoples' psychological behaviors such as when Facebook had shut down just for an hour many started panicking. The hackers' intentions are to help many out there to see what’s going on behind the scenes. If one believes in Anonymous, and call his/herself-Anonymous,

Anonymous is an activist group. This is going to be a quick paper summary explain what anonymous about.

Much of public protest in recent Western society has been typified by a decidedly social character—that is, the social movement—the likes of which has occurred on an unprecedented scale in the 20th century. In Gabriella Colman's 2013 paper “Anonymous in Context: The Power and Politics Behind the Mask”, she identifies the group Anonymous to work within these paradigms while acting entirely outside customary limits on candour. Through their absolute commitment to freedom in the face of tyranny—and lulz in response to dictators and oligarchs—Anonymous is a definite force of good against evil, and their intentions a net positive to the world.

In his October 2014 TEDGlobal speech, “Why Privacy Matter?”, Glenn Greenwald argues the importance of privacy and how people constantly crave for privacy. He references Edward Snowden’s leaked archives as well as two well-known CEOs, Eric Schmidt and Mark Zuckerberg, to support his argument. The purpose of his speech was to inform and persuade his audience how privacy still matters and those who say otherwise are lying. Greenwald gave an emotional appeal to successfully reach out to the audience and persuade them. However, Greenwald’s ability to build credibility and ethos was weak and therefore, impacted his argument.

Although some people have argued that they don’t care because they have got nothing to hide, Edward Snowden, the former CIA employee who revealed the US government’s global surveillance project PRISM in 2013, strongly disagrees. He tells them, “Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say” (Schrodt). Indeed, privacy matters a lot in our lives, and privacy is definitely more than having nothing to hide. Privacy is essential to us because we have nothing without it. Under full surveillance, we lose our sense of self. They also claim that democracy is endangered by data collection on the internet. For example, Kirsty Hughes, chief executive of Index on Censorship, has claimed that “snooping and surveillance on this scale is not only an invasion of privacy, it also undermines the basis of democracy and free speech”

I like the article and agree with several points that were made in the article. One thing that I like about the article is that the author present an argument for the usefulness of anonymous sources even though the article is about the opposite. Anonymous sources can sometimes be good. For example, whistleblower who risk losing their job when they come to present negative stories about their workplace. I am in the middle when it comes to whether anonymous sources are to be use or not when presenting a news

Plenty of people assume that oil is the reason of all wars and conflicts in the

Snowden’s leaked information prompted debates all over and it brought major concerns about personal privacy and the security of citizens. His actions to risk his personal freedom to bring controversial information to the public domain is an act of great patriotism, it upholds the virtues in the US constitution. (Gurnow, 2014) Nonetheless, ever since the events of terrorism in 2001, the NSA have given spy agencies mandates to carry out surveillance on suspicious persons, thus reducing acts of radicalization and terrorism.

In the mid-1990’s Tor was built to support government spying operations by military programmers. The program later resurfaced in 2013 when a man named Edward Snowden “leaked a trove of secrets about U.S. government surveillance, and showed a sticker on his laptop supporting the Tor Project, the nonprofit that runs the anonymity network” (Smith). Today, Tor is software that can be downloaded online and operates like a web browser, however, it tends to move slower because it is “bouncing packets of data across several continents to protect anonymity” (Smith). The United States Department initial provided money to the Tor Project, so that many people such as journalists,

The United States of America is a worldwide powerhouse in nearly every measureable category. The U.S. is a leader in material abundance, pop culture and especially high-tech weaponry. “The global military supremacy that the United States presently enjoys—and is bent on perpetuating—has become central to our national identity” (Bacevich, 1). Americans have convinced themselves that the U.S. has some sort of cerebral advantage above all others when it comes to war and military practices. So much so that the United States acts as the world police, monitoring all conflicts and interactions, intervening when favorable outcomes are needed. The idea of continuing to participate in war for national profit stems from the second generation of neoconservatives. The new generation of NC (neoconservatives) aimed to strengthen American global power in the wake of the collapse of communism. The NC saw the perfect opportunity to solidify American dominance through military action, the result was a smooth transition from the cold war era to the time of American hegemony. Engaging in was has ability to create a unison within a country that is divided, Operation Iraqi

The media outrage over this young ladies recent suicide . It was reported that the organization released wrong information in trgsrds tp who the person was that commited such actions againt Todd. I don’t belive that the true anonymous should be protected. The minute he chose to be malicious in his acts, not just once but continued to persue her until she took her own life. At that moment I felt he lost that priviledge just like Amanda Todd did and had no option of getting that back. Life-threatening manipulation and criminal activity on the internet is one of the most noticeable problems to privacy. Overall, offensive anonymous correspondence and posting is done mostly by those who have just learned of inconspicuousness servers and when the newness wears off, the rate of recurrence of the exploitation declines. Nevertheless, a slight minority of individuals who use anonymity servers are sociopaths who are fascinated by the easiness with which they can evade accountability and liability for their doings. Amanda Todd harasser be it the accused that anonymous identified or someone else is the perfect example of these

The other solution, held by Stafford, follow Zhou’s line of thinking but asserts that we cannot eliminate anonymity is all of its aspects. Stafford claims that anonymity has its important uses in many situations such as dissent from a suppressive government, protection for stalking/rape victims, and for protection of company whistleblowers. Stafford states that: “[Anonymity] might be vital if you’re a Chinese or Syrian dissident or, for that matter, a spambot turned corporate whistleblower.” Stafford uses specific examples of where anonymity may be necessary but leaves out many other issues. Since Stafford is looking just at newspapers and other forms of news media and how anonymity undermines responsibility of published works, he fails to

Many Americans do not have a broad base feeling about why we are fighting in wars. However, I believe the U.S. is fighting for power and control of resources in other countries. Whether any American wants to believe it or not, freedom is not the sole reason why the U.S. is willing to go to war. When you look at the history of the United States, almost every President doesn’t like something somewhere in the world and is willing to dispense military force to fix it. We fight as a nation because we perceive that it is in our best interest to fight then Presidents will tell us it is about freedom and nice common values to make it sound like it is in our best interest when it is in fact much more that occurs behind the scenes. America is constantly seeking power. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, ordered Paul Wolfowitz to write a grand strategy for the U.S. that without the Soviet Union, there was no one who could possibly approach the U.S. in military terms. The plan says that it should always be that way and our

Anonymous would go on to lead the first cyber battle between non-state actors . Anonymous is a hacker collective who believes that all information should be free; if not, Anonymous will attack to pressure the release of information . Anonymous harnessed the collective power

Hiding one’s identity is nothing new. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay authored The Federalist Papers in 1787 under the pseudonym Publius. The ability to communicate anonymously is viewed as part of our basic right to free speech . With the advent of computers and ease of access to the internet, becoming anonymous as never been easier, and is far more reaching than the colonial newspapers of 1787. For some this ease at which we can communicate anonymously is cause for concern. Although we are no longer hiding our identities to promote the ratification of the Constitution, being anonymous still plays a significant role in our society. Online anonymity grants anyone with an internet connection an unbiased voice, regardless of gender, race, or wealth. Without this freedom to online anonymity, many people would not feel free to express themselves or share sensitive information about themselves. In the case of whistleblowing, anonymity also promotes the release of information to help fight government corruption and oppression. Anonymity can also be used as a security measure and prevent unauthorized mining of personal information by not giving access to our real identities. While the ethics behind anonymity can be foggy, multiple ethical frameworks, including duty-based and just-consequentialism, can be used to add clarity to the topic. A duty-based framework stresses the role of duty and respect for persons, including one’s self. While a just-consequentialism