Pros And Cons Of Bill C-51

From analysing my research, I disagree with the proposed amendments. According to Van der Meulen (2013) this bill is supposed to protect the sex workers, however, it is hypocritical in which it puts the sex workers at increase harm. This paradigm is associated with a paternalistic view that ignores the issues of consent and choice. I believe violence against women must never be tolerated whereas; the Bill C-36 fails to address the issues to protect women in the sex trade industry. Canada’s justice minister insists that once passed, the Conservative government’s new prostitution bill will mean safer conditions for sex workers, “the ultimate goal, however, is to end the sex trade in Canada altogether” (O’Malley, 2014). Along the same lines, Conservative Sen. Donald Plett said “of course don’t want to make life safe for prostitutes; we can’t to

I am against Bill C-14 which has been ratified into Canadian law on the basis that it is unconstitutional. Every Canadian has the right, just by virtue of having Canadian citizenship, to have sovereignty over their own self. Because Bill C-14 will in some circumstances permit people to take the life of another, it undermines the individual's right to have complete ownership over his/her own body, and is therefore unconstitutional.

In September of 2017, Trump Administration announced that they were officially going to discharge the DACA ( Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) Program, making the United States shake. It took everyone by surprise, like the family members. The DACA was brought through both Congress, President Obama in 2012. Meanwhile, the dreamers grew terrified of how their lives were torn away. This has caused many individuals of many ages that have DACA to worry about how they are going to support their families and it also affecting getting higher education. The Trump Administration announced on September 2017 that they would remove DACA. This program was clearly for kids that were brought by their parents at a really young age. Do the dreamers deserve this

The article, “How Ottawa’s New Terrorism Act Could Chill Free Speech” by Kent Roach and Craig Forcese is briefly about how the new terrorism law restricts people from free speech. The authors of this article believe that this law, also known as Bill C-51 is panoptic and that it accuses even those who have no intention to promote acts of violence. In addition, they consider that this recently passed act condemns constitutionally legal speeches by providing a hypothetical example of a foreign affairs newspaper columnist who expresses her views on the Ukrainian crisis. The journalist ideates that the Canadian government should support Ukrainian rebellions who are intending

- This speech made by Pierre Trudeau shows how much the Canadian government cares about doing whatever is in the best interest of the country and the Canadian People because it shows that the government wants to protect its national security, and at the same time wants to do it in a way that won’t harm the general population. However, in the case of the October crisis this was not possible and the government was forced to resort to the War measures act to save preserve the national security of Canada. Despite having to resort to this act, the government did not forget about the general public and told them that the government will be held answerable any and all of its

Supporters of the facilities would argue it was a step in the right direction, and that the Conservative legislation passed in 2015 was a major setback. On the other hand, those who oppose the safe injection sites completely will be sure to make it as difficult as possible for future sites to open around the state. The tensions between judicial and executive governments in Canada is not new, and the balance of powers within the state represents the Canadian democracy. The controversy is not over, and it is in the Liberal government's hands to see what the next step will be for safe injection sites in

Within the last fifty years, many reforms have been pushed regarding illegal immigration, especially for young people. In 1982, in the supreme court case Plyer v. Doe, all students are entitled education from preschool, elementary school, to high school, regardless of their immigration status. The court decision was a triumph within immigrant communities. Nevertheless, because the court decision does not guarantee postsecondary education, individual states have fought to “allow undocumented students to qualify for in-state tuition at the public colleges and universities.” Thirteen states have adopted this policy: “California, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, and Washington.”

We in the Canadian Government do not support the unlawful abuse of our citizens especially when the targeting is due to social class and ethnicity. Canada is one of the most diverse countries in the world but we still face the same issues of violence that is faced By our neighbours to the south.

The Bill of Rights—the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States—ranks alongside the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence as one of the nation's most treasured documents. Since its adoption in 1791, the Bill of Rights has served as the cornerstone of basic American freedoms. Its laws specify the fundamental rights and most cherished liberties of the American people and protect them from the whims of popular majority opinions and abusive government officials.

Would Canadian citizens feel safer with the Trudeau government implementing these legislations in? To be honest, they would, Justin made some very valid points and these did help him win a majority government.

Firstly, National Defense Act increased the number of regular army’s soldiers from 90,000 to175,000. This act’s final was to let the soldier’ number move to 175,000. Also, it set the National Guard to provide the enough space and troop for the army’s training. In addition, the Congress passed a $313 bill, in order to build up a navy. Secondly, the Zimmerman Note was an intercepted cable from German. The cable said that if the United States started the war to German, German would let Mexico enter the alliance with Germany. So, Mexico could get their lost territory back, like New Mexico and Texas. Thirdly, the Selective Service Act was a act to require men who were between 21 and 30 to register with local draft board for the war.

In Ohio there are many problems that people come encounter with. Some of those issues may be minor while others are life threatening. Regardless if the issue is minor or major, people would like to see a change. One issue in particular that has become an important issue to the state of Ohio is the misunderstanding of an imitation firearm to an authentic one. To fix this problem, House Bill 16 was introduced to the committee to regulate imitation firearms. This bill is to protect those who are innocent and those who are in an authoritative position to not mistake it for an authentic one. In many cases imitation guns have been the cause of deaths, especially to younger children who are the ones that have it in possession. This is issue is not only a problem in the state of Ohio but all over the nation. It easy to mistaken the two guns, one real and the other fake. So in doing so, this bill that is currently still introduced to the committee should be taken into action and enrolled. However, with doing that can bring about some disadvantages, especially with big business and manufacturers that create these guns, but the argument of each citizen's life seems to be more in a reasonable favor.

Another myth that many critics of the DREAM Act believe is immigrants who have broken the immigration law will encourage more illegal immigrants to move to the U.S., with the knowledge that their kids will have a passageway to legal residency. Essentially, in the adversaries’ eyes, it suggests an incentive to break the law. Additionally, those that oppose the bill feel that the young immigrants applying for college and receiving financial aid creates a level playing field for U.S. citizens and undocumented immigrants—which is just unfair. Basically, undocumented immigrants will have an equal shot at precious state and federal resources as legal residents if the DREAM Act is passed and this is particularly offensive considering the economic

The outcomes of this legislation had many pros and cons many of which more serious than others for their own reasons. Some of the cons of this legislation are for one the immigrants had no right to a hearing in the court and had no right of evidence. Also, it was considered as unconstitutional according to the Republicans. Finally, another big part of this legislation is that it hindered freedom of speech and freedom of the press because some people were arrested when they spoke out against these acts or made journal articles bashing the Federalists. Some of the pros of this legislation passing somewhat came from the cons, for example, all the people who were arrested under this act were pardoned by the new president which was Thomas Jefferson.

The HHS.gov website provided an extremely simplified clarification about the law. This article explains how the new law makes the consumer more responsible