Pros And Cons Of Building Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear power plants are a safe, clean and reliable source of energy production. They are uniquely qualified to meet the growing demand for energy in the USA.

Firstly, the usage of nuclear power is consistent and plentiful. As we know, the reaction of nuclear can emit a great power of energy, it can support vast of families’ and enormous plants’ working. In addition, unlike solar energy and wind power, which depend on external factors, nuclear power is consistent generate at anytime and anywhere. Secondly, since the nuclear power is easy to produce and it also can generate a huge amount of power, it is much cheaper to use it. What’s more, like Hill’s saying, “with the cost of natural gas and oil soaring”, the nuclear plants have return back to work and produce massive energy. Lastly, nuclear power benefits to environment: not only because it does not produce the carbon emissions, which can alleviates the global warming; but also it reduces the noxious byproducts, like sulfur dioxide, which is main reason of air pollution. Therefore, using the nuclear power is an ideal energy resource for human

Nuclear power is a much greener option than others, and can help prevent the devastating effects of fossil fuels on the environment. Burning fossil fuels releases thousands of tons of GHGs (greenhouse gasses) into the air that cause a variety of serious environmental problems. The emissions cause global warming which leads to the melting of polar ice caps and the raising of oceans. This also causes acid rain and air pollution which pollutes water sources, accelerates erosion and damages ecosystems (Pacific

A typical nuclear power plant employs about 400 to 700 people depending on its size. The wages paid to nuclear power plant workers average 36% higher than for other local jobs. According to Nuclear Energy Institute’s study, a nuclear plant alongside new jobs also creates jobs in neighborhood, from grocery merchants to builders who build properties. When members of the society are engaged in productive jobs it helps them to grow their self esteem. Employment brings money and recognition to individuals and the society gets better and more good and services. The new jobs also increase the living standards for individuals. The financial security and higher living standards is a key to good physical and mental health of the individuals. The new job creation can also help reduce other social impacts due to unemployment like drug abuse, family disruption and poor prenatal care.

Nuclear Energy has many supporters around the world. The benefit of Nuclear Energy are clear to many. People who are for Nuclear Energy, support it for many reasons. The outcome of produced power can be changed, all you do is change the fuel entering the chain reactor (Page 11). One main factor that puts nuclear energy on top is it lets out little air pollutants, greenhouse gases, smog, slows global warming, and helps limit acid rain (Sally

The potential and economic effects of Nuclear power can be devastating. Just look at Chernobyl. And everywhere that has Nuclear power. Where does all the radioactive and toxic waste go? We just put it in a huge barrel, and bury them in deep caves. It doesn’t get rid of the problem, it makes a bigger one. What happens if there’s an earthquake, and all of that spills and gets into our water system, or our oceans, or kills off our animals? It’s not safe.

The use of nuclear power is risky, costly, and dangerous. The chances of having it leak are great, and if it ever does manage to leak somehow, it will take millions to clean up the mess. Nuclear power plants are also expensive to maintain and build. The money that goes to building nuclear plants only to have them taken down again could go to greater causes, such as funding other sources of renewable energy. For example, solar power, wind power, geothermal power, hybrid and electric cars, and aggressive energy efficiency are climate solutions that are safer, cheaper, faster, more secure, and less wasteful than nuclear power (“Ten Strikes Against Nuclear Power.” Green America.). Overall, the cons of building and using nuclear power (plants) outweigh

Nuclear energy gives us enough energy to last beyond our lifetime. This energy source helps countries who does not have enough fossil to support their population and their needs.

Nuclear Power is widely regarded as a viable choice in enabling sustainable development, especially when renewable energy sources remain in their growing stage of development and distribution. Nuclear Power has many benefits compared to f of However, nuclear power also remains one of the most controversial sources of energy. The debates on it are mainly based along the lines of environmental, safety and security.

Also we would need to be very careful if you were to build it, since it would be almost in the middle of Pennsylvania. If there was an accident we would have to evacuate hundreds of thousands of people. Just take Chernobyl and Fukuyama nuclear power plants, for example, they both melted down and the surrounding

The first reason why Nuclear Power can be beneficial is that by building a Nuclear Power Plant, it will bring several jobs to the community. The jobs that will be brought to the community will not only be jobs inside the Plant, but there will be construction jobs, engineering jobs, electricians, heavy machinery workers, and many more.

Personally, I believe there should not be a nuclear power plant built. Overall the cons outweigh the pros. The plants are too expensive and impact the environment too heavily. Although the actual energy may be cheaper, the cost to run and maintain a plant is very high, and not to mention the cost to store the nuclear waste. The possible risks associated with it are too great and honestly very scary. Although the immediate effects don’t seem horrible, the long lasting effects are too

Nuclear power is expensive to build, expensive to maintain, and expensive to replace if something goes wrong. One facility in a multiple facility plant can cost up to $9 billion dollars to build, and more money to maintain. The whole world will require many nuclear power plants to provide energy, which will be expensive. If completed it will reduce pollution, but not fix the pollution

So the topic today is about building a nuclear power plant in East Pennsboro Township, which is very close to the capital and three-mile island which poses a giant target for terrorism. There are not that many nuclear power plants in the world so that makes TMI and the power plant we build a really big target, plus it is near the capital so that can kill hundreds of thousands of people. But there are some pros and cons to building a nuclear power plant in East Pennsboro Township.

The positives to having nuclear power plants is that unlike fossil fuel power plants it doesn't contribute to global warming and therefore climate change. This is due to the fact that it doesn't diffuse carbon dioxide into the environment. The Uranium mined from Uranium ores can last for a long time unlike fossil fuels, which don't last forever. Also, nuclear power plants don't emit harmful, polluting gases such as Nitrogen Oxide and Sulfur Oxide. These gases, as mentioned earlier, can harm people and the environment. Altogether, these positive points form nuclear power plants as a safe and reliable way to generate the electricity. The negatives, however, counteract these. The negatives of a nuclear power plant are made up of both issues and risks. Issues that may arise include the limitation of non-renewable sources such as Uranium (fuel used in reactor), how difficult it is to safely dispose of the produced radioactive waste through storage, importing the nuclear fuel Uranium and the time and costs of building and decommissioning nuclear power plants. Like most issues, there are many ways to counteract most of these. The limitation of Uranium-235 is due to the fact that it only makes up around 1% of all the mined natural Uranium in the world. Mined natural Uranium mostly consists of Uranium-238, an isotope. However, Uranium can last for a long period. Uranium in the fuel rods can undergo nuclear fission for 18-24 months. Therefore a small amount can last a long time. To safely dispose of the radioactive by-product produced by the nuclear fission of Uranium-235, it goes through a process of vitrification. This process mixes the radioactive by-product with ceramic materials and is then melted to produce a type of glass. This glass in the form of liquid is poured into cylinders of steel, is then cooled and sealed securely. The steel