Pros And Cons Of Captive Animals In Aquariums

What is the best limit to the dangers to animals after their release from the program, and to monitor their success are both a important facts of Captive Breeding. In 2008, the Condor Preservation Act, a federal bill that stops hunters from using lead bullets in the California condor’s range, it were effect. In the time of captive breeding, if the scientist will be able to look over animals, We could learn facts about different species that we don’t know, or even a break through from science, it could be a huge step forward to the future.

It is widely known that captive animals live unhappy lives. Although they are majestic and entertaining to watch, that is not what they are meant to do. On occasion, they become so overwhelmed and upset they die under the care of their false environment. The news is often restrained as much as possible from being heard. Zoos, and every so often aquariums, also breed animals and then proceed to sell them; at times even to people who use them for hunting purposes. Animals should not be held captive, it is extremely unhealthy and stressful for them.

Many children experience a magical interaction with animals at the zoo or aquarium. Sheltered by parents and our society, most are unaware of the injustices against wild animals in these facilities. Just like infants, people today are oblivious to the fact that animals are restricted from their freedom. Humans should put an end to animal suffering and address the concerns of the restriction of space that rob animals of their ability to behave as

keeping animals in captivity can have many effects upon the animals, some negative and some positive. An example of the negative impact is the orca whales that are kept in Sea World. Many of the orcas in captivity have collapsed dorsal fins, this is a result of many of the whales being either sick or injured. In zoos many animals develop a condition known as 'zoo chosis' which is similar to dementia, as a result of this many animals show distress when they are in their enclosures and often swim or pace in circles. Many animals in captivation often become anxious or aggressive due to being continually watched by the public and having no space to hide, animals often react this way because to them being watched all the time can be predatory and

There has been significant increase in the number of zoo-based studies exploring the relationships between visitors and captive animals, in particular non-human primates (Carder and Semple, 2008). Visitors effect on an animals can be classified in three ways either stressful, neutral (or no consequence) or enriching (Choo, Todd and Li, 2011) A considerable amount of research has been focused on the effect of visitor presence on the behaviour of captive animals (Hosey, 2000). Although studies have included other species including multi-specie bird groups (Downs, 2012) and other mammals, the majority involves research with primates due to their higher range of behaviours and susceptibility to change from external influences, this however is limited

Over the year’s researchers have discovered different affects that captivity has on animal behavior. Before 2010 captivity was seen as causing changes in the behavior of wild animals. An early study done in 2004, focused on the long-term effects that captivity has on a group

Animals’ cages in captivity is sufficient for an animals to have the freedom that it need. Animals only have to be placed in “sufficient” cages that meet certain regulations in disregards to the animals needs (Blanchard 93). Many animals are not given the luxury of roaming free but are subjected to a space not qualified for their needs.

will not realize how much of the zoos efforts they will not see. So much goes

Animals bred in captivity can quickly become less fit for survival in the wild, research suggests. “US scientists found steelhead trout reared in hatcheries were much less good at reproducing than wild fish.” An evidence shows that animals kept in captivity behaves differently than those in the wild. “The lions were so unused to the world outside their cages that they were frightened of grass and too nervous to drink water from pools in their enclosure.” If this is the case the outcome of the reintroduction may not result as a great success.

When people go on a trip to the zoo, it can be assumed that they do not think about much more than what they can see. Signals that make zoos unfair and sometimes unbearable for the captive animals are not visible to most spectators. This essay will explain how zoos are unjust and should not be supported. Animals should not be held captive due their negative behavioral changes, lack of natural habitat and the zoos failure to effectively preserve endangered species.

Because of increasing environmental impacts from human activities, a growing number of captive breeding programs are being initiated to salvage endangered species and/or populations from extinction (IUCN 199; Seddon et al., 2007). Historically, many of these programs have been met with considerable difficulty (Philippart, 1995, Snyder et al., 1996; Frankham, 2008). There are some basic provisions that are common to all including aspects of animal such as animal accommodation and facilities; special needs of particular species, animal welfare and nutrition, veterinary attention and facilities, hygiene, emergency procedures, staff training and facilities (Macdonald and Charlton, 2000). But lives of animals in nowadays zoos are being endangered as these basic

Now that I have given an account of moral status, discussed what is involved with confining animals, and explained why I think utilitarianism is appropriate for tackling this topic, we are better situated to engage with two key arguments that are used to justify keeping animals in zoo and aquariums. Starting with the claim that they provide significant benefits in terms of education.

When wild animals kept in captivity act out against captivity, they develop unusual symptoms known to experts as “zoochosis” in some cases. The article “Zoos” on

Throughout history man has suffered from a myriad of diseases and health conditions that we only know more about and can treat or prevent through animal testing. Animals in captivity are not only used to advance medical research, but also to prevent species extinction and for educational purposes. The debate about holding animals’ captive has been a long and heated one that has no endpoint anywhere in sight. The main argument of the opposition to using animals in biomedical research, zoos and aquariums is that animals are treated in inhumanely.

There are about 6,000 different species of animals that are placed in zoos and held captive each year. Many exotic animals are captured and forced to stay at zoos for most of their lives. These animals deserve to be free, but at the same time people need jobs and money needs brought into the zoos. Without trapping these animals, the zoo would fail to bring in any money; however, the animals are becoming psychologically damaged due to captivity and its many consequences. Yet, zoos can also save exotic animals who do not have a place to live, or cannot find their own food to eat. Both sides of this controversy are extremely important and have many different ways of looking at the issue of trapping many animals each year. Some people believe that trapping exotic animals at zoos is beneficial in many ways while others do not.