Pros And Cons Of Cloning

There have been recent studies on animals where the scientist cloned the animals. Cloning is something many people are split on. Some say it is bad some say it is good. I think cloning is a bad thing. Cloning can be a bad thing in many ways. I will be covering some of those ways in this paper.

This is useful because it can reduce the time needed to make transgenic animal models and the results would be a population of genetically identical for animal study. A transgenic animal model is a cloned animal. Another thing is that it can revive endangered and extinct animals this is good because you can learn more about these animals and take test on them to find out important and useful information. You can also clone livestock, some cloned cows can produce twice as much milk as regular cows. Our last supporting statement is that scientist can clone stem cells. Cloning stem cells can possibly grow new whole organs and can help researchers find treatments and cures for diseases. Now let's get more into our first

Recently the world has turned its attention to a new development in science, cloning. Cloning is defined as “the process of producing a clone” (Dictionary.com). This has become a big deal because the endless ways we can bring back extinct creatures. Such as, the extinct wooly mammoth, the Tasmanian tiger, and Quagga. With the endless ability to bring back animal from the past with DNA there comes a problem. With human DNA made available so easily science has come to the idea and process of making designer babies. A designer baby is a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or to ensure that a particular gene is present. A family gene might be a bad disease which a baby might get when born. Before this, cloning a baby was science fiction idea to people. It was never imagined or even thought possible, but now it is not. Scientist have already started to create ways to clone babies. With this comes the problem of how far should scientist go? This could be both a blessing and a curse.

Animal cloning started without the world even knowing. First, an animal clone is “an exact physical copy of one ‘parent’” (Newman 12). “Animal cloning experiments began in the 1960’s. Frogs were the first subjects. By 1987 scientists had begun cloning cows and other mammals” (Newman 12). Dolly the sheep was the first big cloning success, credited to Ian Wilmut in 1996 (Praded 21). This sheep was a scientific breakthrough, but it also caused many people to question the intents of scientists. Many people wondered if scientists would clone humans next. The original intent of animal cloning was not for the food industry. The reason animal cloning started was to find a way to help cure currently untreatable diseases (“Why Do Scientists Clone?”). By cloning cells, scientists will be able to manipulate the cells to become something new.

The topic of cloning has brought much debate in science and also in society. Many

The recovery period after large scale injuries could be shortened. The effects are analyzed in an article that states, “True healing could occur thanks to the cloning of their own cells to help the recovery process” (“Pros and Cons” 5). Basically, the process of cloning healthy cells could be used as an aid in replenishing damage of unhealthy cells. This process, if it were to be actualized, could help recovery progress in anything from pulled muscles to the paralysis of an entire limb. In theory, the same research can be applied in other areas. If this technology is paired with stem cell research, it could result in a method of repairing physical damage. An article that focused on advances in biotechnology stated that “Another use of cloned stem cells could be the growth of replacement tissues in the laboratory” (LaPensee 15). Necrosis, apoptosis, and lymphocyte diapedesis all cause tissue damage or death. These tissues could be replaced by cloned cells of healthy tissues. This shortens recovery periods and leads to healthier tissue growth.

There are many arguments against cloning. Leon R. Kass bases his argument on repugnance in his article The Wisdom of Repugnance. He is a well-known physician, educator and scientist. Kass perceives cloning as offensive, grotesque revolting, repulsive and wrong. To establish his argument he states, “Most people recoil from the prospect of mass production or human being, with large clones of look-alikes, compromised in their individuality.”1 His rationale is cloning is unnatural, because it is asexual and requires only one parent. Kass believes that cloning turns natural procreation into a manufactured process, which is not natural or moral. In his essay he also points out that cloning will also change the way we see ourselves through our

. Cloning could prove helpful in the research of genetics. Using cloning technologies, genetic researchers would have a better understanding of genes. Researchers could gain the ability to alter genetics in order to clone humans and

Human cloning is capable of aiding doctors and medical researchers in creating new medical treatments and therapies, which is also

the attempts made at adult mammal cloning actually work. Dolly’s status as the first true clone of

As years pass, new discoveries are made through extensive research. These discoveries improve the life expectancy of humans, due to the continuous advancements in medical research and equipment. Infact, a main controversial aspect of medicine that has blown minds is said to be cloning. Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of an organism. It is divided into two branches: reproductive and therapeutic. Reproductive cloning creates an animal genetically identical to its donor, where it is then placed back into the uterine environment for further development. Therapeutic cloning on the other hand is quiet similar in the sense of formation. However, the resulting cloned cells remain in a lab and are not to be inserted into a female uterus to be nurtured into a fetus. These cells are instead used to treat and prevent diseases and conditions. Over time scientists have put forth all their knowledge and research into creating their very first fully cloned animal. But, until this day, “observers say that no reputable scientist is actively attempting to produce a human clone through reproductive cloning.” (“The Science of Cloning”,1) This procedure remains to be an issue worldwide due to the harm it carries along to reach its beneficial goal.

There are actually many benefits that would come with cloning, such as being able to cure defective genes s, many cosmetic surgeries, and possibly, being able to cure cancer. The way that cloning would be able to cure defective genes, would be by cloning the same genes, but altering them to be benefit the human body rather than be a negative aspect.

Cloning has become a major issue in our modern world, from moral, ethical, and religious concerns, to the problem of financial and government support. Human cloning is one of the most controversial topics, and because of this, many of the new important discoveries and beneficial technologies have been overlooked and ignored. Reproductive cloning technology may offer many new possibilities, including hope for endangered species, resources for human organ transplants, and answers to questions concerning cancer, inherited diseases, and aging. The research that led up to the ability to clone mammals started more than a century ago. From frogs to mice to sheep to humans, reproductive cloning promises many possibilities.

The cloning of embryonic stem cells has proven to be very innovative in the medical field. One of the point made were in the article "The Medical Benefits of Human Cloning." it says the following. We can produce embryonic stem cells of which that can be grown to replicate organs or tissues to repair or replace damaged or lost ones. This could mean that we would have the ability to save people from agony and suffering. For instance cloning of the embryonic stem cells we are able to grow new and improved skin for burn victims. We would also have to ability to grow back damaged brain cells, giving people a second chance. Another example of the uses cloning being a step forward in the medical field. Scientist have proven that they can do amazing things with cloning. In the same article "The Medical Benefits of Human Cloning." it states that we may one day be able to clone livers for people who are without. This could mean that some day in the near future we could give people another liver if it was lost. If we are able to replicate a liver for someone that could mean that not too far behind are kidneys and or bone marrow. If we could replicate bone marrow we could save millions from dying of cancer. In conclusion, maybe someday in the near future we may be able to save many savable people from death with newly innovative cloning

There are animals, plants, and possibly humans that have all been cloned before. "Either they have been artificially or naturally cloned" (Stratfor). Scientists are still researching on how to artificially clone humans. The amount of technology in this world, anything is possible. "The first ever artificially cloned animal, was a sheep named dolly" (Stratfor). It took a lot of difficult work for the reproduction. Humans should be cloned for extra body parts. Those extra body parts could save lives. Cloning should be used in this world, so that no animals could go extinct and humans will hopefully be able to be coned in the future.