Should there be stricter rules about how coaches treat their players? Does the way coaches teach influence the players’ behaviors? Most believe that the way a coach teaches is to bring out the best in that player and, show that player their real self. Coaches that use strict methods bring out other parts of certain players they may have never seen before. They also give the fundamentals of life advising players on what they need to work on personally and mentally. Giving insight on what they see inside that player and giving the key to unlock their full potential.
Sometimes coaches can be hard on their players but that’s only to bring out the best in them. Coaches use certain scenarios and drills to make their students shine. Sometimes it take a little yelling or contact. But, not to the point where its abuse. For example choking a student out or pushing them in the back. Those aren’t the correct methods to use on certain people. Some people need a gentle touch or encouraging words that helps them otherwise.
…show more content…
The coach has every right to yell at the players. They’re going to get yelled at anyway at some point in lie. It helps get them prepared for the real world and real life situations. If they make it to the pros they are going to hear a lot more a little criticism wouldn’t hurt. Coaches have to be hard to push the limits of students helping them get better with the encouraging words that sometimes come out in different ways. Some coaches find that the hard approach works better bringing out anger in players helps them control it better. Then when they are are hard on them they kind of see the coach wants the best for them and the coach wants them to be the best
“Transactional” coaches and “Transformational” coaches. Transactional coaches are “the kind of coaches who use players as tools to meet their personal needs for validation, status, and identity.” (Ehrmann 2011, pg 5) Reading about transactional coaching revealed two things individually. One, I was coached by transactional coaches. Two, I do not want to be one. Reflecting on my second point there are times I have been a transactional coach. Especially as a younger coach. I lacked the skill to go further beyond the whistle and loud voice. It was very common for me to punish athletes with extra drills or running. Transactional coaching is just that a transaction. You, the athlete do what I say and I, the coach, the coach will not punish you. Transactional coaches pay attention to their best athletes and look at the “other” athletes as cannon fodder for scrimmages and drills. Transformational coaches look at all athletes as equal. Transformational coaches look to sports as part of the whole person. Sport offers the individual an opportunity to change and grow. Sport can change lives and has. What is strange is there so many examples of transformational coaches in our society. Dean Smith, John Wooden, Lou Holtz, and John Gaglardi, to name a few. Yet as a society we tend to hold up the transactional coach. Is it because coaching in this style is easier? Are coaches given enough time to think about how they
I believe that their should stricter rules on how coaches treat their players. There have been many issues on how coaches treat their players like when coaches yell at their players they may cuss at them instead of explaining to them. When coaches need to talk to one of their players they yank them and pull them and that isn’t really needed.
In any game one team will win and other team will loose. It’s a universal truth. Game supposed to play for leisure, interest and entertainment. In any competition every one wants to win, that does not mean you have to choose the violent way. Coaches need to be strict in order to keep rules and regulation, but does not mean he can bully players.
It is the coaches’ responsibility to teach loyalty, honor, respect, commitment, and work ethic. It is the player’s responsibility to carry these things out and conduct themselves in the appropriate manner. If a player cannot follow the team rules, make the commitment that is expected, or conduct himself properly, then he will be held accountable for his actions.
Coaches… there are a lot of coaches out there. Good coaches, bad coaches, and great coaches. Me personally likes a coach who is always on top of his belongings and business. If a coach slacks off and doesnt even care about the players or staff or the game he is coaching then he is plain out a terrible coach. I once had this one coach who didn’t care at all. He was terrible in and outside the classroom. He constantly gave out book work and didn’t even teach. On the field he didn’t even coach. He constantly gave us hell and always had something negative to say. He only lasted one year here because he was terrible. Now a very good coach i had… he was always there for the players. He always stayed on top of the game and was always there to pick
First, I must disagree with the quote mention because yes if a coach makes rules, I’m sure some will follow to an extent. However, the coach must be expect to follow these rules as well and make sure that they are set their foot down when someone is disobeying these rules and not letting their athletes go without a form of discipline because anyone can make rules yet it depends on if the rules are fair and give opportunity for self-awareness with the athlete understanding what error they have caused and how to not repeat the scenario in the future. Yet, I do agree with resolving conflicts on a case by case basis when the situation escalates to a point where I find it appropriate for such actions to be initiated because discussing the error with the individual on a one-on-one basis may lead to a resolution that may positively end the
My topic is similar to yours. I have always been intrigued to examine the relationship between coach and athlete. In my experience, I have found coaches who provide positive support and are constructive with their criticism are more enjoyable to play for and give the athlete a more positive experience. Coaches that come across as condescending seem to push kids away from the game. It is important that the student-athlete has a positive experience, especially student-athletes at a young age. I feel if a student-athlete has a negative experience at the interscholastic level he or she will be less likely to stick with the sport.
It goes without saying that coaches and many of their student-athletes are highly competitive individuals. I know from my time as a student-athlete, along with eleven years as a coach, that on game days I was a little bit edgy, tunnel-visioned, and ready to compete. Competition, after all, is what makes sports exciting; it keeps the games fun for the players & coaches and exhilarating for the fans. However, there is a balancing act that all coaches and athletes face between having a ferocious will to win, while also displaying appropriate body language, speaking the right words, and being a part of a positive team culture.
Sadly, dealing with unreasonable, loud, obnoxious parents can be the most challenging part of coaching. Many coaches just want to make a difference in young lives instead of having to deal with the extra baggage of a high-strung parent. “If a parent does not like what you are doing as a coach, then there is no reason that parent can’t become a coach. One of the most difficult problems in coaching youth sports is dealing with an irate parent, but this problem can be diminished by holding parent meetings before and during the season.” (Put ‘Em In Coach, 33)
The coach also does not create any positive feedback for the weaker links on the team to work with. Instead of telling the team they ALL did well, the coach focuses on who are the better athletes. As a result, the members feel
A strict coach is the best coach kids can have now a days. Coaches have to be strict on some kids. Children needs to be discipline to know the game of football. Coaches have to show children how hard life is. Children do not understand that this is the real world. The world we live in now kids have their own way with other people, and some children think getting in trouble is cool. Coaches need to be strict to let the children know who’s in charge. The world we live in now some kids run over their coaching staffs. Discipline is to key to success for children to have a better future in life. Life is not easy especially for teenagers. Teenagers need to be discipline to show respect to other people.
From that main point, I would emphasize that if a player ever feels as if they are being harassed or bullied they need to make the coaching staff aware so the situation can be dealt with. Dealing with those who harass would be in some form of a three-strike system. The first report of harassment would result in a meeting with the coaching staff for the harasser, in which it will be outlined what the complaint was and that it will no longer be tolerated. A second report would result in a more tangible punishment such as a possible half-game suspension. The third report would result in a full-game suspension. Any further issues would result in further punishment determined by the coaching staff.
The coach will portray that mistakes are not acceptable and the athletes should make as little mistakes as possible. The coach will also show that he/she does not have patience for the athletes that cannot pick up the skills quickly. The coach will condition them if they make mistakes. The coach will have a very loud strong voice, demanding, and intimidating attitude. The coach will enforce fundamentals and skills that the athlete will need to be successful in the sport.
An increase in the number of reported instances of parents engaging in abusive, violent, and controlling behavior toward coaches,
In contemporary American sports, coaches can, at times, be extremely temperamental and my resort to bullying tactics to try to motivate their players to get them to perform at their highest possible level. This may take the form of face-to-face confrontation in which coaches challenge individual players in private, or it may take the form of publicly humiliating individual players or groups of players in front of the rest of the team to motivate certain players by exploiting their fear of criticism or the loss of respect from their teammates.