Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Paid

The hot topic in amateur sports has been as to whether or not college athletes should be paid. The NCAA amateur rule states that an athlete in college sports cannot be paid other than their athletic scholarship. These athletes spend a tremendous amount of time at school practice and then working on schoolwork after practice. The NCAA is an organization that oversees all of the athletes that make up the basic unit of intercollegiate sports. The success of the NCAA whether it’s through the sale of merchandise, game day revenue or NCAA tournaments that each individual sports has, despite the absolute success of these tournaments these athletes receive any monetary compensation .Some of the main reasons why the NCAA lack of payments are that it wants to maintain its amateur status and

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes roughly $1 billion in income annually and the athletes do not receive any of it. This topic has been debated for many years and is still being debated. The debate dates back to the 1980s and now athletes are demanding that they deserve to be paid since profits are made off of them. Some athletes such as former and current basketball and football players came together with lawsuits to federal courts asking for rewards from profits NCAA makes gets of them. Research has opened several different opinions on this matter. There are many pros and cons for paying college athletes. College sports provide a huge source of the university’s income. The athletes, however, receive their scholarship

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

College athletes should receive some sort of payment for playing for their college. Many people believe that college athletes should be paid financially, because they are considered to be taken advantage of by the NCAA and most other school systems, because they should receive pay. Most college athletes are the main reason for huge profits from many merchandise sales; live events such as the game itself, and media and live coverage also provide sales increases. Differently from the professional sports, the athletes don’t get any type of cut. College teams may not have the same national expectations as the professional ones, but they are just as important, if not, even more important than professional athletes. Millions of dollars of merchandise,

The System for college athletes isnt perfect, and needs to be worked on, a big problem we cannot seem to agree is how to compensate the student-athletes who drive the NCAA. I would like to start off with a question. Are college athletes being compensated enough for the effort they put forth today? Every Day they wake up early and represent their university whether they are putting in work in class or on the field. Each student-student athlete generates tons of money for their university and they don’t see a dime other than their scholarship that may or may not been renewed every year. Keep that question in mind while reading this essay, and form your own opinion.

There are many good things that can come out of paying college athletes. Unfortunately, there are also many bad things that can happen. People think that paying athletes may actually want them to try in school and not fail. “These

The NCAA feels the athletes should not be paid. Horace Mitchell from the NCAA Board of Directors states

Throughout the years college sports have been about the love of the game, filled with adrenaline moments. However, the following question still remains: Should college athletes get paid to play sports in college? Seemingly, this debate has been endless, yet the questions have gone unanswered. The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) plays a vital role in this debate. The NCAA is a billion dollar industry, but yet sees that the athlete should get paid for their hard work and dedication.

College athletics are becoming more like the professional leagues except for one big issue, money. Student athletes bring in a vast amount of revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) not to mention recognition and notoriety regarding the athlete’s university. However, the debate continues as to whether student athletes should or should not receive payment for playing college sports.

Abstract:  Collegiate athletes participating in the two revenue sports (football, men's basketball) sacrifice their time, education, and risk physical harm for their respected programs. The players are controlled by a governing body (NCAA) that dictates when they can show up to work, and when they cannot show up for work. They are restricted from making any substantial financial gains outside of their sports arena. These athletes receive no compensation for their efforts, while others prosper from their abilities. The athletes participating in the two revenue sports of college athletics, football and men's basketball should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

They are fundamentally exploited by a system that makes not millions of dollars, but billions of dollars, and that enriches everybody around expect themselves”- Joe Nocera (Should the NCAA Pay College Athletes?). In an effort to draw a clear line between college and professional sports, the National Collegiate Athletic Association has prohibited the payment of athletes for their sports related skills by emphasizing that college sport is one of the many branches of the educational program. However, it is my belief that the established guidelines by the NCAA seem to unjustifiably limit the opportunities and success that a student-athlete could have, thus, new rules should be implemented that allow athletes to be fairly financially compensated for their talents.

There have been many debates about whether or not college athletes should or should not be compensated by their schools for their services. The way it should be is that they should not be compensated for their works for various reasons concerning the schools they play for. Coming from a college athlete, compensation for us will only bring trouble for the schools we play for. From many other athletes’ points of view, they want payment for their own benefits or needs, but they don't see how it will affect the schools they attend. Colleges should not be entitled to providing compensation for their student athletes because it will hurt the colleges financially.

Tim Edwards Dr. Hermanson Literature Review 4/25/16 Should college athletes be paid? The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a nonprofit organization but in 2010 they signed a TV rights deal with CBS for fourteen years and 10.8 billion dollars (“Revenue”). The argument being made by many is that with millions of dollars being made that the NCAA should pay the athletes money to compensate them for their time and effort. The rules of the NCAA are very strict on the amateur status of their athletes.

Should student athletes get compensated for playing sports at the collegiate level? Or is the funding the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) provides through programs that directly support the educational, financial, and health and safety needs of student athletes enough? Peter Ohr of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently stated, “Northwestern University Football players often work many more hours than the players spend on their studies, effectively making them athletes first and students second”. Furthermore, the NLRB granted Northwester University football players the right to unionize in March of 2014. Although this is a breakthrough regarding the controversial topic, it could take numerous years and plenty of