Pros And Cons Of College IsnT Free Essay

College tuition, something that everyone worries about and works tirelessly to save their entire lives for. What would happen if college tuition disappeared and college was suddenly free? In this rhetorical analysis, I will be analyzing two different articles on if college should be free. While both of these articles use logos and politics to prove their statements and force their arguments to be stronger, the first argument explains that college should be free for everyone and the other disagrees and discusses why college tuition should stay as is. It also gives more strength and credibility to the author’s and articles.

Universities used to be a privilege for most academic students to attend and it was very affordable, but currently the price per year to attend college has drastically increased. For instance, in the “1970’s the average cost was 10,000 dollars a year and today the average cost is 30,000 dollars a year” (CQ Researcher). This is a triple increase in the price per year to attend college. Allowing this increase on college tuition has impacted the student’s attendance rate. This is a significant financial burden for college students and their family. Some believe that college shouldn’t be free because we are risking the value of college education, while others think it should be free because we are trying to avoid having our upcoming generation

“"Free" is a word with a powerful appeal. And right now it 's being tossed around a lot, followed by another word: "college."” (Kamenetz).The debate surrounding free community college for all is becoming rather controversial. Since there has been no law set in place federally some states are taking aim. Washington has a scholarship program called “Washington Promise” that supports what this act is all for. As the world continues to flatten, it seems the only way to compete in the globalized economy is by higher education. Even though the funding is large, the first two years of community college should be free to all. The Washington Promise, a scholarship program in place to provide scholarships to high school seniors who graduate from a Washington high school, is a way to help students in the Yakima Valley attend college and graduate with an A.A degree which helps stress the importance of liberal arts, and help decrease what Thomas Freidman, the author of The World is Flat, calls the education gap at the bottom.

President Barack Obama introduced his America’s College Promise proposal to make community college tuition-free for students in January, but Finger Lakes Community College (FLCC) President Barbara Risser did not bring it up with the collegewide governance body until October. She did not endorse it; she only asked the approximately 20 members to think about what it would mean for the school. No one responded. Mr. Obama says his proposal would expand the reach of higher education, a goal that fits with liberal ideology. Given that academics tend to lean left (Jaschik, 2012), the lack of enthusiasm for a seemingly liberal proposal on a college campus might seem unusual. This essay will review the tenets of conservatism and liberalism and explore their usefulness in predicting the impact of American’s College Promise and who might take sides for or against it. It will show the president’s proposal cannot be categorized neatly into one of the two dominant ideological camps. Wilson’s cost-benefit typology proves a more meaningful way to consider the potential ramifications of the policy and how that information could be used to refine it.

The article as a whole provides useful information for the readers and eventually helps low income families and the society overall. Stated within the article, “million students march protesters demand tuition free college and debt cancellation.” The article provides another article that helps substantiate the proposals that Bernie Sanders has proposed. Being the reader we can’t help, but get mad and build resentment towards the college board and begin to question authority.  According the article Donald Trump has said that, "debt should not be an albatross around [students'] necks for the rest of their lives." The article not only provides statements from Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders but also provides Statements from our current President. Therefore, giving the article an advantage of credibility because there is also many information given within the article. Such as a link to another article named, “Million of students march protesters demand tuition free college and debt cancellation” as well. Within the article a view was stated, “though critics argue such programs could lood college with people who don't want degrees, don't help the neediest students and could strain institutions resources.” The prejudice within the article gives many especially student readers a sense of discouragement and provides information that the college board would read upon and eventually change their mind on Bernie Sanders proposals. Bernie Sanders as stated, “Every American, regardless of income, must have the right to a higher education.” As a reader begin to make conclusions that support the proposals made by Bernie Sanders to an extent of approval by student who don’t get a chance to go to college. This quote gives the society a sense of opportunity and

In the article “Free college? We can afford it”, author Katrina Vanden Heuvel believes that higher education should be free because the cost has risen and many students are no longer able to attend. Students cannot afford a college education. Low paying jobs are some of the reasons why people have a hard time finding a 2-4 year college degree institute. Why increase the amount of tuition for students? The author also mentioned that decreasing student funding restrains them from attendance. Katrina’s statements are agreeable because free education will expand opportunities for the youth.

Andrew, Kelly. “The high cost of free College.” U.S. News and World Report. 23 February 2016. http://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/articles/2016-02-23/bernie-sanders-and-the-high-cost-of-free-college>. Andrew’s generally claims that bring change in education system is not really easy as Mr. Bernie Sanders thinks. Sanders has truly great idea to free college and universities fees. He uses a selection of appeals to influence the audience as action-oriented. In which Sanders is fully confident about this idea and he believes it will bring better future. Sanders uses political language and references in which the reader can identified the pros and cons of this matter. He uses logos to convince the audience through enrollment and graduation

Ms. Jones’ students of 6th period, do you really want to live in a country where in order to seek higher education to eventually obtain a job, you must pay thousands of dollars to do so? I certainly do not. As prospective students—people who will attend college in the future— we all dream about free university and many might consider if college is even worth it.Coming from someone who is just like every single student in this class; I am sure you all will agree that public college should be virtually free.

In February of 2015, Citizens Voice published an essay written by Dr. Michael MacDowell, in which he gave his opinion on Barack Obama’s recent proposal to make the first two years of community college free of charge. Dr. Michael A. MacDowell, retired president of Misericordia University and a writer for Citizen’s Voice, disagrees with Obama’s plan and makes this clear in his article 's title, “The Community College Model Works Just Fine.” MacDowell’s biggest arguments is that the community college group is not the most effective group to offer free education. MacDowell successfully uses statistical facts and evidence to create a convincing essay.

“Here’s what Bernie Sanders Doesn’t Want You to Know about College Costs.” His explanation as to why free college tuition is not a viable solution for the United States is clear and to the point. The author starts by explaining why college is so expensive and then goes on to debunk the free college solution.

As many young millennials rally behind Bernie Sanders and his outlandish claims of free public college for all, others sigh and shake their heads in disapproval. Are these college students really entitled to free higher education? Is it every American’s unalienable right to have a college education? Despite the recent push for free college in the United States, the economic burden and drop in personal responsibility it would create proves that colleges should maintain their current tuitions.

The words “free college tuition” spark interest in any college student with accumulating debt. In fact, this topic is so incredibly supported that Bernie Sanders implemented it as a core interest in his 2016 campaign. Once Hillary Clinton became the Democratic nominee, she decided to take it on herself with an extensive plan that guaranteed students free tuition. Unsurprisingly, free tuition resonates extremely well within the student demographic. To forty million Americans, free tuition eliminates the largest problem for students: debt (Hess, 2017). However, free college tuition generates the inverse of what these low-income and middle-income students believe. In fact, free college cripples them from multiple perspectives; students will end up spending more financially, will be less likely to graduate with a degree, and will be subjected to more inequality and less exposure.

Instead of directly answering whether he is pro or against free education, Kelly rather examines why ‘free’ education is not free at all, sharing that ‘free public college’ is but a “flawed policy” (n.p.). For Kelly, ‘free’ education is not free because the cost of one’s education is actually coming from the taxpayer’s money. Therefore, the attempt to grant free education for all can trigger only more tension that can go beyond the political but also the economic: for Kelly, this will only create scarcity (n. p.). Furthermore, it is maintained that the cost of tuition may not entirely be the reason behind why some students still cannot finish their tertiary degree. Instead, Kelly posits that policymakers should target the well-deserved and

High school Seniors are faced with a very important decision regarding their future. Where should a person attend college following graduation? Attending college is important in helping people receive a college degree that will help in educating them for a successful future. Deciding where to attend college can be a challenging choice. The University of Kansas (KU) and Washburn University (WU) are two colleges where one can obtain a degree. When deciding which college to attend, one must consider the costs involved, the housing options, and the student activities offered.

College, in our everyday world, is considered to be something that uplifts or elevates a person's opportunity in life and is widely regarded as a huge reward on completion. However, is taking away some of the risk in this achievement, the correct thing to do? Changing an integral part of American society, such as college, could have many life changing and societal negative effects and is overall not worth it. College should not be free the first two years due to a necessity to raise taxes to accommodate the "free college", academic and educational quality being hindered due to more teachers being needed, and apathy among students if college became risk free.