Pros And Cons Of Colonizing Mars

In conclusion, colonizing Mars is a terrible idea There is no known natural source of water, Once you get there you cannot come back , and If you get sick, the astronauts

One large project that is being pursued is colonizing mars with a human population. This will mold the future and newer generations. It can make us question the future and what lies ahead. It has been said that it will take no more than 50 years to fulfill the colonization of mars.

costs six billion dollars just to send a couple of people to Mars. The people in which are organizing this expedition say it can be done by 2027. Colonizing Mars is a terrible idea, since people are risking their lives, there is not a natural source of water on Mars, and it costs a tremendously outrageous price to reach Mars.

Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, has been trying to get a manned mission to Mars since 2002; it was the reason that he started his own business to build and improve on rocket technology.

People are going to colonize Mars! Colonizing Mars is a great idea because of NASA technology, Mars resources, and human capabilities.

Kim Stanley Robinson, known best for his writing in science fiction, wrote the short persuasive reading titled “Why We Should Go To Mars”. This article begins with Robinson stating that although the reasons to send humans to Mars ranges from good to terrible, as a civilization we should ultimately go to Mars. One argument Robinson introduces is the similarities between Earth and Mars should be enough influence to get us to go. If we leave our home planet to begin analyzing and exploring mars, it’s speculated the findings could only benefit us in the long run. Additionally to this argument Kim also states we should go to Mars in order to discover extraterrestrial beings.

There has been a lot of talk about mars. Out of all the potential options, most have settled that mars is the best for humans. The enthused Frank Stratford, in an article, says, “let’s do this thing…Let’s approach this with the benefits of six decades of spaceflight, push through the costs and in one risky megaproject of settling Mars, reach to the benefits of advancing… so that we and future generations can grow from our new discoveries on Mars.” Indeed, Despite inherent risk, colonizing mars is both a priority and a goal for the advancement of our species.

“Could Mars be the home for future generations”? The growing concerns of overcrowding, and global warming leads to the conclusion that humans must start looking for alternative habitats. Mars, also known as “The Red Planet,” is adjacent to Earth, the fourth planet from the sun and thought to have once contained life as recently as 60 years ago. The possibility of inhabiting Mars has intrigued humans for years. Landing people on the planet would be a very encouraging step and establishing a permanent settlement would be a huge achievement for technological and societal progression. The colonization of Mars is a difficult goal that will be accomplished by creating a facility that sustains life, transporting qualified candidates to the planet, and adapting the candidates to the planet

Colonizing Mars Many governments and organizations such as NASA have always known that we could stay on Mars, but do people even want to? Everyone should live and colonize on Mars in the next few centuries. People on Earth should terraform Mars so humans and many creatures could live on the planet. Terraform means to transform a planet so people can live there. People should terraform Mars to create a new society that has resources, more space, and none of Earth’s problems for people.

Society is in the midst of a great debate surrounding whether or not to establish a colony on the Martian surface. Those opposed insist that numerous health risks associated with such a lengthy mission exist and the monetary costs would be a burden too large to bare (Huff; Do et al. 222). However, proponents of the plan argue that Mars is an opportunity for society to restart and improve its conditions (“Founding Declaration”). More support comes in the form of the red planet being labeled as a world of potential life (“Founding Declaration”). Consequently, humans must explore in order to find any such life (“Founding Declaration”). With improving technology, more money, and less risk, a Mars trip is within society’s reach and should be pursued as soon as possible; to disregard such an influential opportunity would be to strip society of the chance to improve and gain valuable knowledge.

Mars should not be colonized by humans. It is a very bad idea and it is too dangerous. Mars should not be colonized because people could starve from not getting enough food, the rocket can blow up , and people will never be able to see earth again.

The United States landed a man on the moon in 1969, and has returned a handful of times since. Even though the excitement surrounding the United States spaceflight program lessened after this event, there is now a new influx of curiosity surrounding humanity’s next destination: Mars. Introducing the debate surrounding the feasibility and morality of sending humans to colonize Mars. Recent plans by private companies and Mars One alike have sparked this discourse yet again (Do 192). While not short on desire and will, it is unsure if we as a species possess the technical capabilities of sending humans to Mars and sustaining a colony once there. Now the question lies in whether funding such a mission would be worthwhile, or whether the downsides outweigh the positives when dealing with one-way missions to the red planet.

The benefits that the future space exploration including the technology that will be created and possibly of living on the planet of Mars are endless and some even unknown. The space exploration of Mars will open up our minds to countless opportunities and creations that will be vital

Imagine leaving everything behind such as friends, family, money, and everything that exists on planet Earth, to travel over millions of miles to live on Mars. Traveling to Mars seems like a fictional thought that a seven year old may think of, but it is almost becoming a reality. A company entitled Mars One plans on sending humans to Mars by the year 2023. They want to establish another home for humans, and need citizens of Earth to do so. The main issue surround this is that the humans that travel to Mars will never come back. That being said, humans should not colonize Mars. Humans should not colonize Mar because they will face psychological and physical hardships, humans will not have any sort entertainment, and one cannot return to Earth

Have you ever wanted to visit the Earth’s Moon, and see our Earth from 238,900 miles away? There is a way to do that, and that is colonizing our moon. In fact, there are valuable resources on the moon that we could utilize if we lived on the moon, and there are also many research benefits from uncovering new things to discover what is hidden in our solar system. As technology has advanced, and concerns about the future of humanity on Earth have increased, colonizing the moon is our obvious option, better than colonizing other planets because of the moon’s proximity to Earth. There are many projects and ideas that NASA planned to find ways to deal with some of the most difficult challenges on the moon. All of them are realistic and most are