Pros And Cons Of Conscription Compulsory Military Service

“Ideas about human rights have evolved over many centuries. But they achieved strong international support following the Holocaust and World War II. To protect future generations from a repeat of these horrors, the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948 and invited states to sign and ratify it”

3: Military draft: Compulsory enrollment, especially for the armed forces; a monetary payment exacted by a government in wartime.

Conscription is the idea of compulsory enlistment for a state service, typically into the armed forces. The controversy between pro and anti-conscription divided the Australian population during the course of the war. Conscription was mainly supported by those who had never stepped foot near a battlefield. Propaganda played a large role in pressuring men into enlisting. An example of where propaganda pressured men into volunteering for the Australian Imperial Force, is Appendix 1. The motive of this poster is successful as it implies that fathers would be shameful to ignore the plight of women as well as, promoting a sense of guilt. Anti-conscription propaganda also depicted or appealed to women. For instance, anti-conscriptionists would call a vote for conscription, a blood vote, reminding women they were possibly sending men to their deaths. This strategy of manipulating people’s emotions proved to work as in Dec 1917, the 2nd referendum on conscription rejected it. This debate influenced the entirety of Australian society as citizens were bombarded with propaganda and the opinions of others. At the beginning of the war the Federal Government gained great jurisdiction through the War Precautions Act. This was was introduced as commonwealth would need to increase its authority to prosecute war effectively. Along with this, the Constitution was also

Conscription was so controversial because was that it was very normal for two people from within the same social group and who would normally share a similar opinion on something, to have two completely opposing views on the topic of conscription. For example, many of the ANZACs who had fought on the Western Front and returned home to Australia. Some ANZACS strongly agreed with conscription because they knew that more reinforcements were needed on the

It was first introduced in 1909. However, after being re-introduced in 1964 it played a major role in Australia’s involvement of the Vietnam War. This is known as the Menzies scheme and involves compulsory overseas national service. Men aged of twenty were required to register with the department of labour and national service (DLNS). The number of men enlisted exceeded the numbers for service. There was basically a lottery draw. A anti conscription group was formed in 1965 called ‘save our sons’ which began in Sydney. “The Menzies government has made a reckless decision on Vietnam which this nation may live to regret. It has decided to send Australian soldiers into a savage, revolutionary war in which the Americans are grievously involved, so that America may shelve a tiny part of her embarrassment… It could be that our historians will recall this day with tears.” (THE AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER, APRIL 1965) Therefore conscription had a major impact on

We are all living in a time where “War” is associated to fiction and where people, especially young, think that peace is taken for granted. We are used to watch the horrors of war in the news and saying “Poor people, May god help them,” but what happen if this abominable things start in our countries? What will we do? After analyzing this questions and accepting the fact that a war can start at any moment in our homeland, most of the people will clearly see the necessity of the instauration of a mandatory draft where all people will serve their countries in the military, no matter their gender, their social status or religion.

Conscription is the compulsory enlistment of people in national service, most often a military service. In 1917, after Canadians fought at Vimy Ridge, over 10,000 Canadian soldiers died but fewer than 5,000 volunteered to join the army. The volunteer system was not recruiting enough soldiers to replace the losses. In early 1917, after traveling to Great Britain to discuss the continuation of the war, Prime Minister Robert Borden pointed out that Australia, despite having a smaller population had more troops than Canada. Despite, the promise that he would not introduce conscription, upon returning to Canada, Prime Minister Borden was convinced that conscription was necessary to compensate for the losses.

During World War 1, July 28th 1914 – November 11 1918, Australians were divided over the dispute of conscription: should people be forced to fight in the war? Conscription is the mandatory enrolment of a person for military service. It was a very contentious issue in Australia during 1916, as casualty rates in the war increased and the number of volunteers decreased. Prime Minister Billy Hughes decided to take the issue to the public in a referendum, Australian’s were given the option to vote either yes or no on the matter. There were two strong perspectives on the subject. Many people were against conscription, as they thought it was unethical and created employment issues. However, numerous people were for the idea of conscription as they

Conscription was first used in the United States during the American Civil War. The Union sought troops by offering cash rewards to enlistees. Support for conscription was not widespread in the North, and public resistance culminated in the Draft Riot of 1863. Afterward the draft was suspended with the end of the war in 1865, and it would not return until the beginning of world war I. The restitution of the draft was the result of U.S. entry into World War I in April 1917. The Selective Service Act, signed by President Woodrow Wilson on May 18, 1917, created the Selective Service System. In the beginning it targeting male citizens age 21 to 30, the draft was eventually expanded to include all able-bodied men age 18 to 45. After the armistice

Conscription was first introduced when Prime Minister Borden went to the House of Commons to announce the Military Service Act or the law for Conscription which makes all men from ages 20-45 enroll into the war overseas, it then became a law later on August 19, 1917. Conscription was a very debatable idea and very hard for people to understand. Actually, during the first World War, the government was very surprised when they were required to add conscription to the war in the fighting year of 1917. This was evident as around 330,000 people were volunteering for the war in between 1914-1915. Prime Minister Borden thought it would be unnecessary to add conscription until they were forced to implement the Military Service Act in 1917 due to lack of volunteers (Granatstein, 2014). However this was not something that the government would do just because they wanted to, instead, they were forced due to the few amount of volunteers, also they had a divided country between the English and French Canadians. Secondly, conscription was bad for the government to introduce as it created an alienating government as adding conscription put the French Canadians against their government, no government would do something unnecessarily if it had them losing votes. The creation of the law had all of the French members of parliament disagreeing while the rest of the English speaking members of Parliament agreed (Granatstein, 2014). The Prime Minister in World War Two did

Throughout human history, war has permeated the lives of billions of people. From early conflicts such as conquests to control vast swaths of land by Alexander the Great and Cyrus the Great to modern, global wars such as the World Wars, the concept of war has been at the forefront of humanity’s mind for centuries. However, in recent years, opposition to war and lack of participation in the military has become a common theme in many countries, including the United States. To help alleviate the troubles caused by lack of participation, the United States instituted a law allowing for the conscription of its citizens. Conscription, which can also be referred to as a draft, is defined as the compulsory drafting of citizens into military service (What). The Draft has been utilized throughout US History in a couple of prominent wars; however, opposition has manifested against the Vietnam War and the draft, rightfully stemming from ethical opposition to the war and hatred for what the war and the draft stood for.

However, these are two completely different grounds for accommodation. Accommodation to conscription is based on the body while accommodation to taxes is based on monetary value. Resistance to conscriptions is based on a moral and religious obligation against actual violence to oneself or another person. While taxes, simply deal with monetary value regarding ones made up moral conscience, in not supporting a certain legislative or program. These are two separate platforms for accommodation. A government may choose to accommodate conscription through self-skepticism then it becomes the citizen’s job to use self-reflection to realize that they are wrong and they should pay their taxes to participate in everything the government has to

Conscription, or more boldly the draft, has not been in place for some thirty years. While some people cringe at the thought of reinstating the draft, others have different views. This short paper will speak of those different views and the reasons why conscription of military service may not be such a bad idea after all.

Nothing was more divisive than the conscription debate in Australia during the First World War. The highly debated issue of conscription - compulsory enlistment for military service, particularly overseas - had a significant effect on Australian society.

Mandatory military service, or conscription, may be as old as mankind itself. Conscription says that during a time of war all able bodied men and women must