preview

Pros And Cons Of Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework

Better Essays
Open Document

In terms of policy design, the ACA does benefit the American population, expanding coverage and giving Americans better access to care. Moreover the ACA focuses on preventative health measures which is better for the population health in general. This falls in-line with our National Agenda on health as my health policy framework outlines. As mentioned before, the debate of health care reform has been going on for almost a century and it is agreed upon that something must be done to address the issues in the health care system, both in terms of healthcare delivery and health insurance.
Where my framework fails again is in the outlining of policy impact and expenses. In terms of the ACA, its impacts are hard to gage and project. The ACA is multifaceted. An analysis must be done from multiple lens. In the eyes of the public, the consumer could save money under the ACA. In fact, President Obama touted that the ACA will save money.
“I just want to repeat this because there's so much misinformation about the cost issue here. You talk to every health care economist out there and they will tell you that whatever ideas are -- whatever ideas exist in terms of bending the cost curve and starting to …show more content…

Circling back to my framework, a true cost / benefit analysis in terms of the ACA is unrealistic at best. It would be advantageous if all stakeholders knew exactly what they were getting in terms of cost / benefits, there would transparency and better support. However, when equated to the ACA, it’s hard to determine exact costs and savings until the policy has been implemented and integrated within the health care system. My policy framework is incorrect in assuming that all costs could be shared with stakeholders and agreed upon prior to implementing a policy. Therefore a cost / benefits analyses should be done only as an

Get Access