Pros And Cons Of Currency War

Central banks intervene in foreign exchange markets by “influencing the monetary funds transfer rate of a nation’s currency” with the purpose of building reserves, keeping the exchange rate stable, to correct imbalances, to avoid volatility and keep credibility. It implies changing the value of a currency against another one. It creates demand or supply of a currency by buying or selling the country’s currency in the foreign exchange market. (Foreign Exchange Intervention)

Chapter 11: Global negotiations leave groups more fortunate. A government that is purposefully maintaining inflated currency is robbing buyers of imports and creators of exports. A deflated value has an opposing effect, making imports cheaper and exports less challenging. One piece of currency across the west reduces negotiations and encourages price transparency. However, the United States as an individual country are

Before we look at these forces, we should sketch out how exchange rate movements affect a nation 's trading relationships with other nations. A higher currency makes a country 's exports more expensive and imports cheaper in foreign markets; a lower currency makes a country 's exports cheaper and its imports more expensive in foreign markets. A higher exchange rate can be expected to lower the country 's balance of trade, while a lower exchange rate would increase it.

Currency exchange rates can be categorised as floating, in which case they constantly change based on a number of factors, or they can subsequently be fixed to another currency, where they still float, but they additionally move in conjunction with the currency to which they are pegged. Floating rates are a reflection of market movement, demonstrating the principles of both demand and supply, as well as limit imbalances in the international financial system. Fixed exchange rates are predominantly used by developing countries as they are preferred for their greater stability. They grant further control to central banks to set currency values, and are often used to evade market abuse. (MacEachern, A. 2008; Simmons, P.

Currency intervention is the action of one or more governments, central banks, or speculators that increases or reduces the value of a particular currency against another currency – this is according to Wikipedia.

In 1974 the decline of the west was already predictable and U.S president Nixon made a deal with Saudi Arabia. In return for buying oil in dollars, the U.S would guarantee military security and the petrodollar was born. This guaranteed a steady supply of income for the U.S, as the Federal Reserve is a conglomeration of private companies taking a percentage of every dollar used. Rivero’s fascinating insight into the how the dollar plays a key role in U.S foreign policy explains the reasons behind many U.S actions today.

The financial crisis of 2008 has been described as the worst financial crisis the world has seen since the great depression, but there are now murmurings of the potential for an even greater financial crisis, a currency crisis, caused by the demise of the US Dollar. The Dollar has been the reserve currency of the world since it took over from the Pound at the end of world war two, but we examine if it is about to crash spectacularly?

It is my opinion that without the federal government, there would not only be chaos across the board in the private sector, but also in every citizens personal and professional life. With no federal government to back our currency, what would it be worth? How would we exchange the old currency for the new, and who would set the exchange rate? There would be no federal taxes, no regulations on trade – at the interstate and international levels. Who would step in to help resolve matters that involve a transfer across state or country lines? There would also be no federal income tax deducted from our paychecks. While this perhaps seems beneficial, consider this against the certainty that Social Security and Medicare would be over. This would not

lower the value of a nation 's currency by increasing the precautionary demand for money

With the mortgage crisis recorded in the United States, the country’s currency declined in value in respect to other world currencies. Increase in money supply led to an increase in the volume of money in circulation in the United States. This led to a rise in prices of goods. Because of this, the value of the dollar declined in the international money markets. The decline in value of the dollar led to imports becoming very expensive. This further reduced the country’s production capability, leading to a further economic decline. A devalued currency makes a country’s exports cheaper than those of other countries. This has the potential of boosting the level of exports in countries with devalued currency thus reducing their balance of

The United States should pursue and implement policies that are export oriented and keep the dollar relatively undervalued. Right now, there is much controversy over whether or not the U.S. should pursue a strong or weak dollar. It is important to note this controversy because exchange-rate policies are fueled by interest groups who are seeking to advance their economic statuses. An exchange rate is the price of one currency in comparison to another, and are determined by supply and demand. The determination of how much a dollar can appreciate or depreciate is political decision set forth by government. However, government is vulnerable and accountable to the competing pressures of interest groups. Ultimately, the opposing groups have different policies that will advance their economic gain, these policies are directly contradictory and are dependent on the value of the dollar.

Australia has experienced an impressive economic boom in recent years on the back of selling natural resources, including coal and iron ore, to its Asian neighbours, and China accounts for more than a quarter of its exports. So weakness in the Chinese economy is bad news for Australia. Research by consultancy Oxford Economics last week, which modelled the impact of a 10% Chinese devaluation, accompanied by a sharp slowdown, suggested other hard-hit countries could include Brazil, Russia, Chile and Korea. If Beijing allows the yuan to decline further in coming months, it could increase trade tensions, or even a “currency war”, in which the world’s big trading blocs face off in a beggar-thy-neighbour battle to seize the largest possible share

Finally given the slowing economy in Asia the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has reclassified the yuan. Previously the IMF considered it to be “substantially undervalued” compared to other currencies. The IMF has softened its tone toward the Chinese yuan and it is now considered “moderately undervalued”. This new designation makes it harder for the United States government to make a case against and therefore policies to target the imports based on the Chinese yuan. (Davis, 2012)

1. The gold standard and the money supply. Under the gold standard all national governments promised to follow the “rules of the game”. This meant defending a fixed exchange rate. What did this promise imply about a country’s money supply? A country’s money supply was limited to the amount of gold held by its central bank or treasury. For example, if a country had 1,000,000 ounces of gold and its fixed rate of exchange was 100 local currency units per ounce of gold, that country could have 100,000,000 local currency units outstanding. Any change in its holdings of

Our Currency, Your Problem is a case involving the issue of exchange rate regimes and the impact currency manipulation has on economies and trade. The United States and Europe argued that the Renminbi (RMB) was undervalued and claimed that the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) deliberately manipulated the exchange rate to lower the prices of exports, which caused the US and Europe to run huge trade deficits with China.