Pros And Cons Of Darwin's Theory Of Natural Selection

The literature on Intelligent Design and Macroevolution suggests that Intelligent Design is a viable alternative to Macroevolution. Charles Darwin in his book On The Origin of Species wrote the greatest flaw in his theory was the lack of intermediate forms in the fossil record, but he thought more would be discovered as time went on. Contrary to Darwin’s belief Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould found that most species exhibit no change in the fossil record and appear in the

Paley’s assumption influenced scientists to assume that God designed nature thus, assuming intelligent design to be implemented by laws. Subsequently, the Charles Darwin hypothesis explain his assumption on the problem of evil as well, design in nature and with the natural selection clarified adaptation arguing that, everything that result from designed laws. In 1986, Meyer review suggested that, messages conveyed within DNA cell specified intelligence arguing to have originated from an intelligent agent. With this regard, the innovation of DNA cells merely outlined the supernaturalism and metaphysical naturalism.

One thing about natural selection that many people do not understand that natural selection does not increase the odds of survival for a species, but for individuals in that species. This makes sense when someone considers humans. Humans live in many social cultures, where for instance, the odds of survival in a group can be improved by the selection of certain traits that does not improve an individual’s odds of survival. Coyne states, one never sees the type of adaptations that benefit the group to the detriment of an individual (p.122).

For more than 150 years, a revolutionary idea has been spreading all over the world. It helped us discover our origins and revealed our place in nature. It led to the unification of once independent fields of scientific inquiry. And it is being used today to tackle some of the most pressing problems facing modern civilization. But its implications go far beyond science. It has shaped our culture, politics, philosophy and religion, and it has been used to justify war and genocide. That idea is Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.

Every since the publication of the Origins of Species in 1859, the theory of evolution has been generally accepted by scientists around the world, that is, until 1996 when Michael Behe published his book Darwin's Black Box, calling the theory of evolution into question. The theory of evolution states that individual single point mutations in DNA give rise to the development of new characteristics in species. If these new characteristics are advantageous for survival, then the genes are passed down to new generations. As these characteristics are accumulated, new species develop. However, while most scientists have accepted evolution as a scientific fact, they have yet to answer some basic fundamental questions about the process itself. Michael Behe points to this and proposes that the reason scientists do not yet have all the answers regarding the processes behind evolution is because they have failed to see the intelligent design that lies within it. The author asserts that the "data of biochemistry argues strongly that many molecular machines in the cell could not have arisen through a step-by-step process of natural selection"¦much of the molecular machinery in the cell is irreducibly complex." (Bohlin, 2000, p. 103)

The thought that all organisms are perfect after evolution is a common misconception among many individuals. Natural selection does aid in improving the relationship between the environment and organisms yet it does not reconstruct an organism to perfectly suit the environment. Instead, organisms follow a specific process of descent of modification. Descent of modification, one of Darwin's supporting ideas for evolution, states that all offspring inherit traits through their parents by the process of heredity. Therefore, in organisms there is the base of their parents and through selection pressures certain variations will better adapt to the environment. Since there is still an existing form of the parent and the adaptations, the organism will not be perfectly adapted to the environment.

My own impression of intelligent design in nature, is that, a multiplicity of parallel interconnecting complexities exists in any life unit or component.

If members of a species show variation, and there is a struggle for existence, then any sort of trait that carries some small (or large) advantage to survival is likely to be transmitted to the next generation. By being able to survive better, these members of a species are able to reproduce more, leading to a tendency to pass down that advantaged trait more often to their offspring. This repeats ad absurdum, leading to evolution and survival of the fittest. Survival of the fittest counters Paley’s second and third premises; that of there are two possibilities for how organisms came to be perfect for their environments and that it must be design by a designer. Darwin proposes an alternative explanation for evolution as discussed above.

His theory often leaves people guessing. People are so curious as to how and why we got on this earth and those who do not believe in Jesus Christ himself might go to certain extents to back up and try to really grasp and understand the knowledge and ways of Darwin’s theory. If it were so, and evolution by natural selection is as accurate as all of the evidence, examples, and siting say they were, then the history of the world, economy, and environment could be completely misinterpreted. Darwin and many other scientist and people believed or believed that the way of life and the way humans were put upon this earth was because of natural selection and other would say that Jesus Christ is the reason that we are all here

3. His approach to the issue of of “Design in Nature” is that there is no sufficient condition to guarantee the nature of the world we experience. James tells us that the arguments of the past for intelligent design are no longer supported by our experience and, therefore must be false under all probable possibilities. He then explains that theologians have now reinterpreted their systems under the effects of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution and found that there is no sufficient guarantee that the world was not, in fact, created. In other words, the world could very well have been created by God and evolution offers merely more information ot come to understand God’s creation.

They have proposed the biological competition for survival with each other; through the mechanism of natural selection, organisms evolving ideas. However; Darwin believed that prompting biological evolution may have a number of mechanisms; natural selection is just one of them. Wallace not.

The idea of the intelligent design, which is the main subject in all assigned articles, presents our world as a product of the action of a higher, superior Being. This religious and somewhat creative outlook on life differs from the general idea of evolution which states that life is all related and has ascended from a common ancestor. These articles present views that support the notion of the intelligent design and challenge the universally common theory of Darwin’s evolution.

Charles Darwin broached the theory of natural selection in his book the Origin of Species, which has been considered the basis of evolutionary biology to this day. Natural selection is when populations of a species evolve over the course of many generations. Darwin believed that species were not created separately, but instead, species were derived from one another. In other words, the evolution of species creates many variations among creatures, and this is because all of those species came from a common ancestor, and characteristics changed to increase the species chance of survival.

Some reasons why beaks were thought to be so useful for testing Darwin’s theory of natural selection was because it seemed that the more favorable variations in their beaks will be passed down. Another reason was because there were more variations in the beaks depending what the finches ate so he could study a variety of beaks.

Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is a theory that is and has been widely accepted for many years. The reason for this widespread acceptance is the many strengths that Darwin’s theory has. However, even though this is true, Darwin's theory has a few weaknesses. Darwin, although close, did not paint a full realistic picture of evolution with his theory.