Pros And Cons Of Declawing

Animal vivisection is the study, experimentation and research of any animal. Animal rights activists are opposed to using animals for medical research and experimentation because humans do not have the right to use animals. With very few exceptions, we do not experiment on humans without their consent. Animals can’t give informed consent and the vast majority of experiments using animals are so invasive and damaging, that we would never even consider allowing humans to being subject to such experiments. Every year, animals are dissected, infected, injected, gassed, burned and blinded in hidden laboratories all over the world, most of the time without anesthetic or pain killers. If they aren’t killed by the testing, the animals are often not kindly but brutally killed. The dead animals are frequently left stacked in wheelbarrows in front of the animal cages.

An hour-long public hearing done a week earlier has presented numerous emotional appeals that are convincing the council to outlaw declawing, yet a number of pet owners objected the proposal by saying that the pain that cats experience was just temporary. They also justified that the procedure has improved the cats’ indoor behavior.

To begin, the experimental use of animals in medical studies is unethical. These creatures are confined in isolated cages where they are deprived of necessary environmental elements. It is not uncommon that they undergo ghastly methods of experimentation; including the inhalation of toxic fumes, the burning of their skin, and the crushing of their spinal cords ("People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals"). This information sheds light on the grim realities of animal experimentation. These creatures are living, breathing beings that do not deserve to be treated as they are nothing more than lab objects. Not only are they ripped from their natural habitats, but are forced to endure an irreversible psychological trauma . To put it in perspective, imagine a six-month-old child being taken from their parents and sent to a lab to undergo scientific experiments that could ultimately result in

Using animals for medical experimentation and education is a controversial subject that often leads to a heated debate. The issues are complex, but the suffering and waste involved in animal experimentation are painfully obvious. Vivisection, the act of cutting into a live animal, has led the nation down countless scientific dead ends, while detracting funds and attention from more applicable scientific research. The practice of animal experimentation at NYU continues, not because it has been proven to be an accurate and reliable means of research (which it has not) but rather, because of tradition and promotion from those with strong vested interests (i.e. Lynne Kiorpes). These values have

The purpose of showing is to determine the best dogs for breeding and if they were spayed or neutered than this would defeat the purpose. Because of this shows don’t allow spayed or neutered dogs into most shows, although they do have non-competitive shows for spayed and neutered dogs. This surgery also effects the coat of the pet because of the change in hormones. Dogs that are neutered or spayed aren’t able to compete fairly because of this change in hormones that make their coat somewhat dull or have a fuzzy texture compared to those dogs who have not been spayed or

This articles goes over what the implications are for docking a dogs tail and whether or not it really is in the dogs best interest because of their breed and the work that they do or the human benefit. It discusses the actual pain level a dog goes through when the tail is docked. It lets you know about any help concerns and complications that may arise with a tail docking such as delayed healing and necrosis. When it comes to dog shows should the tail docking be allowed for the standard breeds that already have it, when amputation of a tail is not? Most veterinarians do not agree with the tail docking and nor does the rest of the general public. It is even found to be restricted in several countries including Norway, Australia, and South Africa. In the United Kingdom there was an act put in place in 2007 and no tail docked dog can be shown at any event. I picked this article because I have always been interested in why certain breeds get there tailed docked. I always wondered why they allowed it in dog shows for the standard breed, shouldn’t the standard for the breed be how it came out as a puppy? This article doesn’t go deep into that question but I find articles about tail dockings fascinating and I am always wanting to learn more. It is also very interesting to learn how other countries handle the

The idea of animal rights has been around for centuries. Even decades ago, people were taking action for the welfare of animals. Marc Bekoff and Ned Hettinger share this idea all the way back in 1994 when they said that there is evidence that scientist are concerned with animal welfare by acknowledge that they use the guidelines in place to protect animals during research, in order to have their work published (Bekoff 219). Guidelines are the basis for the moral and ethical treatment of animals. Each person may have his or her own standard, but having a standard among the entire population ensures the welfare of the animals. Unfortunately, these standards are not at a level to where the animals are being protected. Many animals in captivity are treated in ways that would shock the average person. Orcas for example, are starved until they do the desired task (Cowperthwaite). This form of operant condition can lead to success, but often leads to resentment and hostility towards the trainers.

Should puppies get their tails docked? This cruel and mostly cosmetic procedure is painful, and is performed without anesthesia. Tail docking is an unnecessary procedure, so why are we still doing it? In many other countries tail docking is banned, however in the United States it is completely unrestricted. Dogs with docked tails can have problems transmitting social cues to other dogs. Additionally, many supporters of the practice say the puppies won’t remember it, so it doesn’t matter if it causes pain. Dogs can also develop medical problems when they have docked tails.

In society, medical researchers, cosmetic companies, and others often perform experiments on animals. Many people feel rather uneasy about this and strongly feel that it should stop. They believe this because like humans, animals have nerves and emotions. They feel pain the same way that we do. And there are some alternatives.

Declawing your cat is one of the most controversial topics within the veterinary field. Onychectomy, widely known as declawing, is an elective surgery that removes the claws of an animal by means of amputation on all or part of the distal phalanges of all the animals toes. The procedure is mainly performed using either a laser, scalpel, or nail trimmer (often referred to as the guillotine method). There is no medically necessary reason to perform this surgery, it mainly falls on feline owners not wanting household items damaged or to help prevent scratch-related injuries. An additional procedure would be tenecomy, the surgery provides evidence of overall better behavioral problems. Although there is no evidence that proves onychectomy is a procedure guaranteed to harm cats, studies have shown some felines will experience short to long-term complications from the procedure. It falls on the owner whether to have this surgery done on their felines, veterinarians usually do not recommend performing it unless it is medically needed, which are usually rare cases.

Rotting flesh, burning skin, chopping toes, cutting tails, and slicing ears are all forms of body modifications performed on those without a voice. Animals of all kinds are subjected to these awful treatments nationally and internationally on a daily basis in animal clinics and households alike. Some argue that these modifications aid owners in identification and allow them to provide their pets with a warm and loving home. Although there is truth to this claim, new research and further developments have formulated better ways to keep animals safe and identified. Therefore, animals should not be subjects to this abuse. Rather, they should be protected against body modifications through the use of federal law as they inflict unnecessary

Imagine this: You have been born about four days ago. You are just relaxing in a kennel with your siblings and mother when all of the sudden; you are picked up and brought into a giant, scary, metallic room. You feel excruciating pain in your ears, and then, your... tail. This is most likely how most breeds of dogs feel when they have their ears cropped, and their tails docked (cut off). These procedures should be banned worldwide, as they are mostly done for aesthetic purposes and pose multiple risks.

Many people don’t know that declawing a cat means the surgical amputation of a cat’s toes from the third knuckle up. (Bellah, 354) Any cat owner can attest to the feline desire to scratch furniture or curtains or anything else that could be considered valuable. While declawing seems like the easy option to put a stop to these unwanted behaviors, it is also cruel and offers no reward or benefit for the cat that has had the procedure. Declawing the small felines can be compared to ear cropping for dogs, as it’s purely for the aesthetic of the owner’s liking. Felines should not be declawed for many reasons, a few of which are the fact that scratching can be controlled, declawing often causes health issues after surgery, and the overall demeanor and behavior of the pet can often change.

This issue becomes highly controversial due to the ethical concerns that arise from it. Animal activist groups voice their concerns on the dire conditions and inhumane ways animals are treated in some, not all, medical research facilities. They feel that animals should

Aside from the possible advantages, disadvantages and alternatives to the procedure, an owner, as well as a veterinarian, must consider the ethical risks surrounding an invasive cosmetic surgery such as debarking. The five freedoms are crucial in considering the welfare of an animal, and after exploring the advantages and disadvantages to debarking, there can be a violation of some sort in every one of these freedoms (11). The first freedom, Freedom from Hunger and Thirst, has a possibility of being violated, as complications to the procedure can result in scarring of the larynx, ultimately obstructing the ability for an animal to swallow their food/water. Freedom from Discomfort is definitely violated, as not only is the dog