preview

Pros And Cons Of Deer

Decent Essays

Deer. A four lettered word and a four legged animal. When you think of a deer, do you find them dangerous? According to Nicholas D. Kristof, the deer are the largest American mammal who kill the most humans each year. Out of 410 mammals, he claims that deer are the deadliest for humans. In his article, “For Environmental Balance, Pick Up a Rifle”, Kristof feels the best way to decrease the deer population and human deaths is by people hunting them. After reading his article I did further research on this argumentative topic. After research, I do agree with some of Kristof’s claims such as the deer population getting out of hand, however, I find his claim that deer are the most killing mammals false.
Surprising or not, a deer is not the most …show more content…

Honestly, there are pros and cons to Kristof’s theory that hunting is the best way to reduce the deer population. There are multiple pros about hunting. Some pros are that it is a great way for humans to connect with nature, for some it is to carry on family traditions, and is an easy way to control the deer population. However, the cons outweigh the pros. A few that stand out are animal suffering, individuals who overhunt, and the deathly hunting accidents that have occurred. Kristof states there are 150 deadly car accidents caused by deer, but I found that, “In 2007, there were 122 unintentional firearm deaths in children, and an additional 3,060 nonfatal gun and shooting accidents” (Iannelli). This statistic does not even include adults. These deadly hunting accidents are about equal to the amount of deadly car accidents caused by deer. Kristof basically says hunting will decrease the deer population, which should decrease car accidents, but hunting is causing just as many fatal accidents. The cycle for causing deaths never ends; our world is a dangerous place, making it hard to solve issues like this. All in all, hunting can help decrease the overpopulated deer, but I do not agree that it is the safest and best or only solution out …show more content…

I will admit that does sound silly, however, after reading more about this kind of approach it became more realistic. Controlling wildlife fertility might be a safer and more humane way to solve this issue. The Humane Society has an immunocontraception vaccine called porcine zona pellucida, and it helps control the fertility of female deer (“Controlling Deer Populations Humanely”). This vaccine can be delivered by hand or darts shot from a dart gun as well. Kristof stated that private companies have spent around $8,000 for deer birth control (Kristof). However, after further improvements this vaccine can now last up to three years, which helps decrease the costs of this procedure (“Controlling Deer Populations Humanely”). The longer the vaccine lasts, the less we would have to re-vaccine the deer. This vaccine is also not harmful and painless for deer, which is another benefit of this. The Humane Society and others believe this a beneficial way to decrease the deer population and accidents. Vaccinating seems extreme or silly to people, but this is the only approach that does not involve a death for humans or

Get Access