Pros And Cons Of Evidence Based Decision Making

Managers within organizations are faced with the challenges daily of making excellent decisions. In everyday life we are challenged in making sound decision, decision that will last for a life time. Folk often wonder after making a decision if it was the right choice, will it affect the people around me, was this a good choice for my family, and will the decision affect them. In order to be an effective manager you have to possess the skill of outstanding decision making skills. In order for one to be successful within their personal life they may also need to possess an understanding of effective decision making. The decision- making process should be one that makes a positive change. Can the decision making process work

Decision-making in the workforce is a process of responsibilities used by upper management to implement, enforce rules, regulations, and maintain a successful environment. Decision-making implemented more effectively by making a plan, thinking it through, accepting more than one opinion and determining what is best. However, decision-making often utilized more effectively by opening doors of opportunities for a suggestion, question, discussion, and feedback. Although, more involvement helps improve understanding, utilize behavior skills and present opportunities for better communication. Everyday life consists of decision-making, the right decision may not always be applied, but ensure room for improvement and opportunity. Individuals approached decision-making in many different ways. As stated by (Jones, Graham, & Bateman, 2006) decision making is a procedure used to recognize a problem, weigh the alternatives and evaluate a solution in which, certain situations will require different approaches to become effective.

Evidence based practice is the basis for needed change in practice and function. It is a sound method for scientific, fact-based change. Changes which have no evidence to support them are fragile, unscientific, and subjective. These changes don’t effect real change over time, as they aren’t able to be proven to a more general population.

Evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing has been widely adopted in many advanced countries. Although EBP has been introduced to Hong Kong for over 20 years, it is still quite indistinct for many nurses and nursing students. For me, a local nursing student, I thought EBP was merely equivalent to the direct use of research findings to guide specific nursing interventions and decision making in nursing care. However, I found that EBP is broader and deeper than what I thought recently.

The evidence hierarchy is a ranking that distinguish the types of research evidence based on the strength of the evidence itself (Polit & Beck, 2012). It is mostly applicable to the research questions regarding the effects of clinical interventions. The evidence that are ranked based on the evidence that uses appropriate research methods, rigorously reviewed with minimized biases and has great clinical implications. The strongest evidence based on the evidence hierarchy is systematic reviews, which draws conclusions from many randomized controlled trails (Polit & Beck, 2012).

An estimated 25 million or more animals are used yearly in the U.S. These animals are commonly used in biomedical research as “models” for human disease, they are also used in basic biomedical research which is research for general understanding. Not only are animals used in biomedical research but, behavioral research as well, such as psychology and addiction studies, military, space, and agricultural research, product development and drug testing, as well as science education. Animals shouldn’t be used for such testing, these tests are unethical, inhumane and completely unnecessary. Thousands of animals suffer and die every day in laboratories around the world. In most states, abuse or cruelty towards animals is illegal. A person can face up to 7 years in prison and a fine of maximum $235,600. If it is illegal for cruelty to be conducted on animals why does it make it okay in the name of science?

QP provided Chase with the opportunity to participate in an evidence base practice geared toward understanding warning signs. QP explained to Chase that the activity will him to identify times when he need to take a time-out and how to use self-calming thoughts. QP explained to Chase, that Self-calming thoughts are used to help de-escalate one’s emotions and separate them from a potentially difficult situation. QP explained to Chase, what red flags are; that is, the signs that indicate to a person that a time-out is necessary or a situation may get abusive or escalates. QP explained to Chase that the goal of the intervention is, to teach him how to identify personal red flags and how to use self-calming thoughts in a situation. QP asked

From the case study, Case 2.1, debate two pros and two cons of evidence-based policy making, by considering the concepts of “ technocratic guidance” and “technocratic counsel.”

As students, health care workers are taught to advocate for their patients. Simply put, they learn to stand up and support those that cannot address their needs themselves. What members of the health care team have failed to learn in the past, is how important it is to advocate for themselves and methods to accomplish it. Over the next few pages, strategies for professional advocacy will be explored.

Often followed by initial dismay, change is not always met with great enthusiasm by the working nurse or patients. Any merge from the known can be intimidating by all who are involved. While change is sometimes hard, it is also vital to the growth and improvement of health care practices (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2013). For this discussion board, I will be discussing an evidenced-based practice that was implemented at my place of employment while backing up the change with identified research.

According to this student’s spouse, the recommended decision-making model for Canyon Vista Medical Center Rehabilitation Department would be the rational decision-making model. The “rational decision-making is a normative approach to making optimal and perfect decisions” (Bateman & Snell, 2007). Furthermore, “this model is characterized by making consistent, value-maximizing choices within specified constraints” (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Based on this student’s spouse understanding, applying the rational decision-making model allows the rehabilitation department to maximize value. They have a quality facility, educated therapist that is valuable to patients. More autonomy and less stress for employees aid in better decisions and help with decreasing turnover. This type of decision-making can contribute to the organization’s

The use of evidence based management could be based on the gathering, analysis and syntheses of data and information to create evidence based management environment in organizations which will help organizations to create uniform practices and policies compatible

Thinking critically and making decisions are important parts of today’s business environment. It is important to understand how the decision making process works and the steps involved. The nine steps of the decision making process are: identifying the problem, defining criteria, setting goals and objectives, evaluating the effect of the problem, identifying the causes of the problem, framing alternatives, evaluating impacts of the alternatives, making the decision, implementing the decision, and measuring the impacts. (Decision, 2007.) By using various methods and tools to assist in making important business decisions an individual can ensure the decisions they make will be as successful as possible. In this paper it

Many times when faced with a hard decision to make or one that involves many different factors or consequences the executive tends to look for “an educated guess” or “take a calculated risk” but no real calculation is done nor any education is obtained to deal with uncertainty concerning the decision.

A study published in the winter 1997 volume of Business Strategy Review suggests the major factor in a decisions success is the decision process itself. The study, by Paul Nutt, suggests that poor decision making