Pros And Cons Of Evidence Based Practice

One of the main barriers in using evidence-based practice is the lack of time in order to implement it into the nurse’s days. In one study, many respondents said that, both at work and outside of work hours, time was just not there (Brown, Wickline, Ecoff, & Glaser, 2009). In another study done many years later, time continued to be a main concern for nurses and that they just didn’t feel like it should be expected for them to keep up with the research (Tacia, Biskupski, Pheley, & Lehto, 2015). Many of these restraints on time can easily be addressed though. Some issues, such as, short staffing can be fixed, while others would take more work to address, such as, not having enough time at home to research due to familial obligations. Setting aside specific time in the workday for nurse’s to research or hiring more nurses in order to split the work load and allow more time in between tasks for research could also be solutions to this specific barrier.

In today 's society, there is a great deal of research and practice about evidence based practice. Most of this is highly sought upon in the field of psychology, where evidence and decision making is key to accomplishing new ideas of treatments for people who retain psychiatric problems. The meaning of evidence-based practice in psychology is that it involves making very educated and supported decisions based on punctilious, unambiguous, and astute evidence (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). With evidence-based practice, it assists in raising and deriving the issue of what evidence really is, the strength of the evidence, and how practitioners can improve the quality of their evidence (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). Evidence is a major factor because it may either enhance or hinder the practitioner 's ability to make decisions and construct their practices on patients (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). Evidence-based practice began in the 1980 's with the goal to combine the practices of scientific evidence with physician education and clinical practice. The issue with this was that medical schools did not have the ability to teach their own specific approaches to clinical problems (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). As an effect to this cause, three main issues quickly arose about the effectiveness and quality of evidence-based practice. First, since other fields were advancing growth in

Evidence-based research is when the clinician/practitioners combine valid/reliable-researched interventions, experience and utilizing a code of ethics, while implementing cultural competency/sensitivity to drive the delivery of treatment. The practitioner, researcher and client are advised to work in collaboration to decipher what works and what needs to be adjusted. This process ensues that the treatment/services if utilized as intended the outcomes produced by research should be effective. This will also prove the success of programs and potentially benefit a wide range of

At the beginning our conversation, we agreed on the following definition of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) that was cited in class: “A process in which you integrate the best available research with your own practitioner expertise and the client’s values, characteristics and preferences” (D. Parrish, 2011). We decided to keep this definition in mind as we discussed this paper and our ideas involving EBP in the work setting. During our meeting, Latisha

Evidence based practice is the combination of clinical expertise, patient values and the best research evidence into the decision making process in order to have a better care for the patient. It’s a patient focused practice so the clinician should make use of the best recent evidence from the research along with patient’s preferences. According to Fineout-Overholt and Stillwell (2015), “formulating the clinical question is like identifying the characteristics of the needle”(p.25). The clinical research question asked ideally defines the best research design for the study. To ease doubt and facilitate getting the right information at the right time, EBP stresses first asking a well-built question, then searching the literature for an answer

As a beginning point in the selection of an evidence-based program (EBP), it is crucial to distinguish the extent of the EBP. This process has four (4) elements: 1) intended population; 2) intervention target; 3) baseline severity level; and 4) intervention delivery characteristics (Durlak & DuPre, 2008).

Evidence – based practice can be defined in two ways as to being the approach to therapy emphasizing the pursuit of evidence on which the theory or techniques would be helpful for the clients to examine evidence before taking action (Pucci, 2005). Another way to identify evidence – based practice is by taking an approach to therapy which is supported by research findings or findings providing evidence that is accurate (Pucci, 2005). The purpose of evidence – based practice is to apply current mental health and addiction practices. As it may apply to individual clinicians, evidence – based practices should increase the efficacy, efficiency, and the applicability of services provided to individual patients (Norcross, Hogan, & Koocher, 2008).

Satterfield, J. M., Spring, B., Brownson, R. C., Mullen, E. J., Newhouse, R. P., Walker, B. B., & Whitlock, E. P. (2009). Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), 368–390.

In clinical practice, there is lack of use of evidence-based practice which is commonly referred to as EBP. The concept of evidence-based practice is that all decisions that are made regarding patient care should be made based on research studies that have been conducted and that these research studies that are selected and interpreted should be according to certain norms of the evidence-based practice. These norms include the disregarding of qualitative and theoretical studies. Therefore, quantitative studies are used in accordance to a narrow set of criteria of what exactly counts to be termed as evidence ADDIN EN.CITE Reichow2010595(Reichow et al., 2010)5955956Reichow, B.Volkmar, F.R.Doehring, P.Cicchetti, D.V.Evidence-Based Practices and Treatments for Children with Autism2010Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer9781441969736http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=znCCkL6XvFAC( HYPERLINK l "_ENREF_7" o "Reichow, 2010 #595" Reichow et al., 2010). This narrow set of criteria is important in making sure that evidence-based practice achieves its desired effects and is not just a broad practice based on all the available research which is referred to as research-based practice. It must be a practice based on concrete evidence from research studies thus the need for these narrow criteria ADDIN EN.CITE Sackett19961107(Sackett et al., 1996)1107110717David L SackettWilliam M C RosenbergJ A Muir GrayR Brian HaynesW Scott

Literature review is the keystone of a research proposal. Argosy (2016) reiterates the APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice (2006), expectations that evidence-based practice (EBP) model, is used by both practitioners and researchers in counseling. The purpose of this expectation is for researchers-practitioners

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a process that involves the conscientious and explicit use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients (Sackett, Rosenberg, Gray, Hyaness, & Richardson, 1996) and in different professional settings, EBP denotes different meanings (Eddy, 2005). Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) recognizes not only the research but also the clinician’s expertise and the patient’s preferences, values, and culture is important to the future of the profession and quality patient care (Levant & Hasan, 2008). Psychologists need a structure and techniques for finding solutions to many questions that may arise in practice. Hence, EBPP proposes a specific method, and develop specialized

There are many ways to define evidence-based practice (EBP). In the most common sense of the term, it combines clinical expertise with external scientific evidence that helps make the best decisions about the patient's care in accordance with the patients’ needs and preferences. Evidence-based treatments require expertise, clinical judgment, and skill from practitioners (Brown, 2013, para.14). Frequently, these treatments include cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), compassion-focused therapy (CFT), and imago relationship therapy (“Evidence-based Therapies,” 2017, n.p.). Different

Ever since Lightner Witmer created the first psychological clinic, psychologists have become more interested in evidence-based practice because of its effectiveness. Evidence-based practice has become an increasingly important part of health care for that reason and psychologists are always wanting to help their patients the best way they can. This practice uses research as well as a clinical component to treat patients. This paper is going to define evidence-based practice in psychology and its three main components. This paper will also explore the strengths of evidence-based practice as well as its weaknesses and limitations.

Evidence based practice is a key aspect of providing quality services to clients. We as clinicians need to be sure that we are implementing and utilizing methods that have been researched and are proven to be successful. Research is a very important aspect of clinical practice, and I have been lucky enough to conduct research with a

In 2011, reports from The Inspector General for Health and Human Services stated 180,000 patients die from medical mistakes a year. That’s 15,000 deaths a month, 3,461 deaths a week, 493 deaths a day, and 20 deaths per hour. Why do these deaths occur? Of course patients die all the time for a multitude of reasons, some deaths are preventable and others inevitable, but how do researcher and other health care interdisciplinary teams use those cases to improve outcomes. When patient outcomes are improved how are policies then implemented to span to future patients? How is new knowledge and scientific advancements transformed into useable forms in the health care field? How does the health care field use acquired knowledge to prevent death, illness, and injury? The concept of evidence based practice is the key; it unifies research evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences to boost patient outcomes.