Pros And Cons Of Expanded Gambling

The case study Gonzales v. Raich contributed to the debate of federalism in the United States, as well as the debate regarding the decriminalization of marijuana, even for a medical purpose. Surrounding the case study, groups of people either defended Raich and Monson stating that they were perfectly legal in their state, or defended the government stating that the federal law should override state law. The role of interest groups and political parties regarding Gonzales v. Raich is to take a side on the issue and allow the public to identify with one position or the other collectively.

For instance, under handed tactics were used to distract the people from the real issues. Gimbaling and the right to vote were a few of these discretionary issues. Although officials gave there best attempt to convince its citizens of the benefits the new charter would usher in, it was defeated in a two to one margin. One of the current governors at the time played a hand in assisting with the defeat of the proposed charter. He aided the defeat of the bill because he feared it would cause tax increases, government expansions, and job loss. (Newell, Charldean, David F. Prindle, James W. Riddlesperger, Jr., Todd Donovan, Christopher Z. Mooney, and Daniel A. Smith, 2013, p.

A.1. You can write or call your local representative and express how you think legalizing casinos will help reduce crime and increase revenue for the state.

However, perhaps due to Texas' extreme conservatism, many Texans opposed the idea. Since then, other states have joined Nevada to allow unlimited gambling in their state. From record economic growth to billions of revenue dollars for state expenditures, these states continue to reap from their bold decision while Texas remains watching from the sidelines. Rather than enjoying the same profits as its fellow states, Texas has found it hard to meet its state budget year after year. Instead of taking the road well-traveled--increasing taxes, Texas should take a page from the success stories of these states and legalize casino gambling as a legitimate way

This debate has been a major one before and after the decision of Supreme Court on this case.

This assignment is meant to explore the landmark Supreme Court decision Mapp v. Ohio. It is the purpose of the essay to examine the facts of the controversy, the arguments offered by the petitioner, and discuss as well the Supreme Court's ruling and its possible impact on precedent. The analysis will conclude with my commentary and opinion in regard to the Mapp decision.

DCS officials and lawmakers are important to this debate because they are the ones that

There are many appealing arguments on the side of pro-gambling groups. Keeping gambling money that is now going to Louisiana and Oklahoma in Texas is one popular idea. Reviving the state’s horse-raising industry by allowing slot machines at racetracks is another. Some advocates want to help struggling Indian tribes develop their economies through gambling.

First, when allowing casinos into parts of the state, it brings with it multiple opportunities for employment, i.e., construction jobs, manager positions, server positions, gaming technicians, etc. When casinos enter a state, research has proven that the unemployment rate dropped significantly. According to the University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center (NORC), “communities closest to casinos experienced a 12 percent to 17

The argument was toward the challenge of the Defense of Marriage Act, which was an issue between the states Federal sales tax. The argument throughout the representatives, in a sense, was questionable and logical. During the argument, Paul Clement, an Attorney for Bipartisan, and Justice Sotomayor, a Supreme Court of Justice Lawyer, were fighting to what local states define same-sex marriage and how the federal laws pertaining to the taxes define whom the client of a spouse should pay the sales & property taxes. It was until more of the representatives and lawyers to comment into this argument about this situation.

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S.1 (1968). Eight votes for the State of Ohio (Respondent). One vote against. Chief Justice Warren wrote the majority opinion.

There are many other controversial issues such as the argument over Texas being California zed, historic conservation, same-sex marriage license, oil production, smoking in public places, etc which require a special attention and cooperation of all the governing bodies to solve these issues.

I think that a sufficient amount of all the extra revenue in each state should be spent on clinics since gambling addiction is an economic problem that comes directly from legalized gambling. The extra revenue could be the answer to having enough clinics to meet the rising need.

Legalizing gambling has been a controversy for some time now, especially on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. They still have not come to an agreement, but have created some laws pertaining to the situation. I personally do not agree with legalizing gambling because I do believe it encourages alcohol, drug use, and increase the risk of mental illnesses.

In the early 1930s, gambling was legalized throughout the state of Nevada and casinos began to flourish (Dunstan, 1997). The economic growth in Nevada, especially the city of Las Vegas, has improved tremendously by the creation of casinos. Many people were employed since the operation of casinos requires a huge amount of labor, skill, and expertise. In addition, local retail sales also increased from casinos when gamblers visit the stores to spend their winnings on various items and products (Garrett, 2003). As a result, many state governments began to legalize casinos in order to boost their economies and increase employment. As of today, there are roughly 1500 casinos in the United States and they generate almost 65 billion dollars in revenue (“Facts on U.S Casinos” 2013). However, casinos use immoral methods to achieve this incredible feat of big profit with few government interventions. While the city of Las Vegas becomes more prosperous than before, many citizens lose their fortunes or even lives by the immoral business practices implemented by the casinos. Even though the