Pros And Cons Of Genetically Modified Children

This topic has already caused mass debates and argument between people, whether they are scientists or just students, everyone has their own opinion. Some people are saying that we should do as much as we can with this technology as we have it, no limitations but others are saying stop wait a second, what do we even really know about this technology. Is it morally okay to genetically change and modify your future children? Should it truly be up to the parents as to what the child’s life will be like? Are there dangerous side affects that we are unaware of yet?

Among the few benefits are humans that have limited diseases, families that have children that they can raise into adulthood that never would have had this opportunity before, and options that have never existed before. The process is dangerous in the sense that it can quickly get out of hand. Putting limits on designer babies is the key. Humans are only humans, not perfect beings. The thought of trying to create a perfect human sounds very ridiculous. No matter how many operations and procedures one baby is given, they can only be a human. Limits and regulations should be applied to genetic mutations to end the possibility of getting out of hand. A baby should not be able to have every part of them changed, what good would this do for the parents or for the baby? A baby is only a baby, no matter what. A baby will have no choice in the way they are mutated. The process, as advancing as it may be, may lead to many issues in the future. This means that we must be wary in the proceeding

Most parents would do almost anything for their children to be the best and know that in life they will be successful and ahead of the game, but what if even before they are even born you could alter their genes to give them an even greater advantage. This would allow one to “create” a child who is smarter, taller, and prettier, even if the parents never carried any of these traits. As the human race continues to develop and modern technology continues to advance, we have been able to create new inventions that could potentially help us overcome daily issues linked with diseases and mutations, but although to some this seems like an incredible idea, the motion of one day being able to modify your unborn baby to look and be who you want is not only morally wrong, but could result in drastic environmental changes. Genetically engineering has influenced many debates as to whether the ethics behind the motion are right, and like most scientific discoveries comes with many advantages and disadvantages.

I agree with Dr. Collin's stance because modifying the genetics of a person takes away their natural god given rights. Those modifyed humans would have no say in how they

Now there are some people that are strongly against this.There are many people that believe scientist are ‘playing God’ by changing the gene of people.But genetically engineering isn't just for modifying humans but also for curing some disease.It's called gene therapy and it had cured some disease for example Cancer, Aids and much more.It’s better for us to act than to not act at

The genetic engineering may not correctly which can seriously affect how the baby turns out. An unborn baby is very delicate and when changing its DNA, if not done correctly there is a large chance the embryo will be destroyed which will completely backfire the whole experiment to create a better future for the baby; If the baby's life ends, there’s no future for it. Also using genetic engineering by modifying certain genes to be enhanced can create negative effects on other genes. Creating a baby with no autism could infact lead to a greater number of problems such as reproductive disorders or anger management. Doctors have also seen worse outcomes such as cancer, organ damage, premature aging and immune imbalance. The process also involves altering chromosomes which effectively causes a good percentage of health issues. This technology is easily being overlooked and should definitely be rethinked in a safer manner. Even if the quality of life were to be upgraded by not having independance from certain things, it’s always just too dangerous to attempt with the life of a loved one on the line. A parent should love their child no matter what they look

Finally, my last reason why I do not support genetic engineering is because it will make some people enter a bad emotional state. In the movie GATTACA,when a person was perfect, but then later found out he had mistakes they would enter a suicidal state of mind. This happens because the person thinks they’re perfect but when they realise they are not they think they’re a failure. If we start genetically modifying our children they could experience something similar to this. We should just let everyone be

Scientists have recently brought up the idea of genetically engineering humans, as if we are machines that need to be tinkered with. Genetic engineering is the deliberate modification of the DNA of an organism. We have seen this type of modification in the food that we have consumed and in the animals that many purchase. It has never been proven to be 100% safe for humans to consume genetically modified food as it is not from nature and our bodies do not know how to react. Also there have been many cases where purebred dogs have been susceptible to numerous diseases because of the decreased gene pool they were modified from, which is the cause of inbreeding. Scientists must never engineer humans because we have seen the bad effects it has had

there is risk in genetic enhancing. Many embryos would need to be genetically changed. Many

The chance of a baby receiving every trait and gene that their parent’s desire is like winning the lottery. Yet that dream has become a reality with the new scientific breakthrough of genetic engineering. Now parents are actually able to prevent their child from inheriting a disease as well as choosing eye color, gender, and eventually intelligence and athleticism. Genetic engineering is the process of extracting embryos from the mother that are then examined by a doctor. The doctor is able to identify the traits of each embryo and the parents choose one to insert back into the mother. This gives the parent’s the power to make their perfect baby and not the baby they would have gotten. Unless being used to prevent disease,

There are many advantages of genetically engineering human babies. One of the main positive effects is that it can cure diseases and illnesses before the babies is even born. This includes diseases such as down syndrome, Alzheimer's which affects your memory and can develop as young as 40 years old, Huntington's diseases, a ‘incurable’ diseases that alters the way people think and their behaviour. There is a 50% chance

The article "Opinion: Gene editing is powerful tool for good but only if used wisely" by "Project Syndicate" introduces the idea of genetic modification. The text states "The critics' most worrisome argument is that opening the door to repairing genetic disorders will also leave the way open for eugenics. Rather than focusing on eliminating diseases, eugenics seeks to introduce desirable traits into the human population." This statement displays the advantages and disadvantages of genetic modification. While genetic modification can be used to eliminate hereditary diseases/disorders, it can also be used by wealthy elite looking to make genetically appealing children by eliminating genes that cause harmless deformities and traits that are considered

As society debates weather genetic engineering is better off being untouched or if the pro’s out way the con’s, this debacle has been occurring for decades. Although society it believes that it is inhumane for humans to do this, all organs used from the animals have died from normal failure, eg old ages. The animals used have not been put through any torture or pain in the making of these transplants. There are so many

Though there are people that are skeptical about people being able to choose the genetic genes of their children there are positive to it such as it prevents genetic diseases such as down syndrome, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s Disease, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, and many others. Reduces risk of inherited medical conditions such as obesity, anaemia, diabetes, cancer, and many more. Genetically engineering babies is an option, not a requirement for all parents. For those that disagree with it, they don’t have to engineer their child. Children are already

I think genetically modifying babies is wrong because it goes against human nature. I do think it is amazing how human research has come this far and I can see why it is beneficial because it can help remove certain diseases that the baby will inherit and the baby would live healthier. But, I think even if diseases are seen to be intrinsically bad, it helps with population control. If every baby was modified to be healthy, then there would be more people living and which would lead to overpopulation. Also, this procedure is not guaranteed to be very safe, so there are many risks. It could damage the child even more and turn out more worse for the baby.