Pros And Cons Of Home Rule In Cities

The national government has much power but not as much as has the state government on state residents (Marchant, 2003). The federal government has more control when it comes to national issues and the state when affairs of states. One of the key ways that the federal government uses to influence policy at the state and local level is the distribution of funds (Marchant, 2003). Congress authorizes millions of dollars in grants to states and establishes rules for how they should be invested well decide the level of control they have over these states federal funds.

They share the same principles with each other. State and local governments can’t create or enforce laws that contradict the Constitution. The Constitution requires “equal protection under the law” for the state and local governments. However, the state and local governments have their differences too. The state has more laws and “ground” to cover than the local governments do. “Each state has its own written constitution, and these documents are often far more elaborate than their federal counterpart. The Alabama Constitution, for example, contains 310,296 words — more than 40 times as many as the U.S. Constitution” (The White House). The local government just deals with the county and their jurisdiction in that state. The state government is more superior over the local government. “A local government must be granted power by the state” (The White House). When it comes to the state and local governments, the state has more power than the local government

A very important aspect of the city and its rules is that one is not forced to do as it dictates. One has the ability to choose between two options. You can either obey the city and its rules or not. If you want to go somewhere else you can do so, but do not complain here.

The relationship between States and their localities in many cases is strained. State government gives their local governments life, they create the laws for them. However, throughout history, state governments have not treated their localities as they suppose to. That is why the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) stated on the state-local relation “Legislators should place a higher priority on state-local issues than has been done in the past. The time has come to change their attitude toward local governments.” They want the state governments to see localities as partners in the federal system.

States have always been sensitive about the amount of power they have; the federal government has always had to step carefully around the demands of the states. This has been true since the beginning of the United States. But both believe that they should have the most power when it comes to certain things. Individual states have different values and as such tend to implement different laws about certain topics; such states want their state laws to reflect these individual values instead of a blanket law from the federal government. States should have less power compared to the federal government when implementing laws dealing with topics such as the legalization of marijuana, gay marriage, and abortion.

They should worry more about our population as a whole instead of all the different laws the different states have. The federal should work more on the relationship with other country and protecting the people in the US. I think if the US would do this the states would have a better relationship and our relationship with other countries could be better. Next people wouldn't have as much bad things to say about and protest about the federal government. If we did this I believe that our country as a whole would be

Mess around with the states, you're gonna get dumped. I like states' rights, we don't want to be a Britain, With a big king hidden where the president is sitting. We need to keep the power in the hands of the

In Warren v. Philadelphia, the court stated that under its police powers, a state or its municipalities may enact statutes and ordinances for the welfare and health of its citizens provided the ordinance is not unreasonable or arbitrary. In that case, the petitioners argued that police powers rest with the state and that the police power that the city was attempting to exert had not been properly delegated to the city. In deciding the case, the court looked to the Home Rule Act of 1949, which stated that "The charter of any city adopted or amended in accordance with this act may provide … for the exercise of any and all powers relating to its municipal functions, not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or of this Commonwealth,

Binding a state to conformity, can only result in uprising a revolt against society. Multiple cases can fit this situation, including the infamous civil war and Texas’ contribution towards it. Many situations lead to Texas rebelling against the union; all including things like the North and South having disputes over slavery, disagreements on the right to secede, and overall a domestic battle for power. These incidents led to an incredibly enraged Texas, making one ponder: why did Texas fight in the civil war? Well, Texas fought in the civil war because of their love for Texas, to defend their state rights, and preserve Slavery.

Many people were affected by the decision government Abbott has made, which leads rivalry between the people who are for and against the law making decision. The people who are for this law settlement, are more likely to remove community local laws that control the environment for society. For example, Maren Taylor from Texas Vot wrote that, “The Texas Legislature has decided that the people of cities shouldn’t have the right to protect the communities they.” The point that the communities from each city, will indeed have to understand that state government officials will remove any local control and replace the rules by what the legislative desires for. In most places, the ban of local activity that

The federal government can tell the states what to do in some cases, but can not take away the powers given to the states. When you travel to another state, the state must respect your state's laws such as driving age laws. For example if you are from South Dakota and have a license at 14, and are driving through North Carolina where you can not have a permit at 14, They can not restrict you from driving as long as you are a resident of South Dakota.. However if you move to North Carolina you must stop driving and wait to get a North Carolina state licence because you have to respect other states laws as well. The state and federal government also have shared powers, laws that would affect both the country and state, such as tax.

The world has always been governed by a set of rules. Without rules people would take matter into their own hands all the time on any occasion. The United States has its own constitution for our country. Certain things affect citizens of each state like basic programs and services therefore; states are accountable for implementing their own constitution under the U.S Constitution. Though the meaning of the word, constitution is the same across the board, the national government and state have different guidelines. The Texas constitution has an extensive history concerning the procedural aspects into adding an amendment, the numerous attempts to replacing the original constitution and how the Texas constitution is designed to specify every rule

Furthermore Jan C. ting asserts cities are able to challenge states laws regarding immigration but that “those laws enacted by Congress under the authority of the U.S. Constitution need to be respected and enforced.” This goes to show that if cities remain sanctuary than they are defining and going against the authority of the U.S. Constitution. The defiance leads to a questioning on the constitutional progress of the country. And they would be defying the Presidents orders. If the cities do decide

According to Dictionary.com, “gentrification is the process of renovating houses and stores in urban neighborhoods to fit the middle or upper-income families, raising property value, but often displacing low-income families.” Gentrification has been an idea since the 1960s and had an effect on countless cities and neighborhood communities. Gentrification was first used by Ruth Glass in her book London: Aspect of Change in 1964, she noted that ¨gentrification can progress rapidly until all or most of the original working-class occupiers are displaced, and the whole social character of the district is changed.” Nonetheless, gentrification has helped revive many cities and revolutionize them, especially with technological

Secondly, urban sector is considered as the showcase of government policy. Therefore, minimum wage laws, pension schemes, unemployment benefits and other facilities are required by law.