preview

Pros And Cons Of Humanistic Psychology

Decent Essays

The social cognitive theory states that we learn behaviors through observation, modeling, and motivation such as positive reinforcement. Some influential psychologists of this theory were N.E. Miller and Albert Bandura. They found that this type of social learning was strengthened if the observer identified with their "model." This meant that children were more likely to repeat behaviors they had seen other children their age do, although they might model adults as well. Learning is also strengthened if someone models a behavior he or she has seen rewarded. This leads to a motivation for the person to model the behavior in order to get a similar reward. http://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Social%20Cognitive%20Theory#ixzz3neATLeiI

This is the psychological perspective popularized by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow (hierarchy of needs) that emphasizes the human capacity for choice and growth. …show more content…

One major criticism of humanistic psychology is that its concepts are too vague. Critics argue that subjective ideas such as authentic and real experiences are difficult to objectify; an experience that is real for one individual may not be real for another person. For this reason, critics believe that conclusions drawn from subjective experiences are almost impossible to verify, making research in humanistic psychology unreliable. In addition, critics claim that humanistic psychology is not a true science because it involves too much common sense and not enough objectivity. Humanistic perspective bases a lot of its theory on the individual and their own actions am things that they do there self and there free will. I’m not sure there is much science behind this and the reaction or what we get from the things we do our self-aid if free will is something we can actually guarantee. I believe we all have it to an extent but how hard this to prove

Get Access