Pros And Cons Of Indus Motor Company

TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM (TPS) The TPS model depends on its Human Infrastructure. The entire model is base on its PEOPLE & TEAMWORK being successful in doing their job and there buy in to the Key Elements of the TPS culture, which are as follows;  Selection  Ringi decision making  Common Goals  Cross-Trained TPS emphasize the point of its human infrastructure as a “COMMON GOAL” for all personnel in the corporation, which again is emphasize that its employees are its greatest assets as shown by the

Toyota is one the most storied companies in the world today, an aspect that has led to it drawing the attention of researchers, journalists and executives who are seeking to benchmark its production system that is extremely famous across the world. This is influenced by the company’s ability to outperform its competitors in terms of cost reduction, reliability, quality and market capitalization. This was exhibited by the company’s ability to replace Daimler Chyrsler as the third largest car company in North America in 2005 in terms of both sales and production.

This could bring competitive advantage in a way such as low cost material purchasing, inventory management system etc. Michal porter’s value chain will be used to analyze the supplier country component of Toyota motors.

Yet, the public perceptions may be at odds with the objective measures. In Toyota’s case, there have been indications that the quality level of the company’s products had fallen off in a span of few years. There are changes that have taken place during a period when most of the company’s close competitors, such as Fords, were producing more cost-effective and efficient automobiles. In addition, the company’s unique production approach and the emphasis on continuous improvement and learning coupled with a matrix structure are key reasons for the company’s leadership in the cat manufacturing industry. Toyota’s Production Systems (TPS) was founded in the principles of “Just-in-time. This approach has less opportunity for slack resources and focuses of the benefits of efficiency on the part of employees and reduction on waste resources (Griffin and Gregory, 5). Further, Toyota Company enacts its production system with the assistance of its human resources strategies, culture, and organizational structure. Toyota’s Production System emphasizes on learning and modesty when it comes to assessing past success and differentiated them from

As Taiichi Ohno rightly says – “People don’t go to Toyota to ‘work’, they go there to think”. “where there is no standard, there can be no kaizen”, and “Improvement is endless and

This is the essential component of the business. Therefore, Toyota uses its powers to support and preserve its employees. Toyota has a well-coordinated and systematic production that efficiently uses the workforce. The central philosophy of human resource management is to give employees with material considerations to develop their work skills. The strength of the company to continually reward employees can also efficiently keep employees in the company without leaving. These arrangements allow employees to work in a comfortable and relaxed atmosphere, thereby enhancing productivity and quality to developing a competitive

This helped the company to have a competitive advantage for the suppliers opportunity cost. Suppliers were paid incentives for improving the process. Continuous contact with the suppliers helped the company to have control for quality and also the computer aided layouts were dispersed. If the supplier used ideas to reduce cost then profit was being shared with them. This encouraged the suppliers to bring more innovation the process and thus Toyota had a competitive advantage over its suppliers if compared to its

Toyota production system is made different varieties of vehicles on the same assembly line. Toyota discover a production system which focus on eliminating waste of time and raw materials from every step of production process to get higher quality, greater productivity, improved customer responsiveness and better utilization of equipment and

The article discussed is written by Lisa Arnseth: “Sharing Value with Suppliers,” Inside Supply Management Vol. 23, No. 4. The article begins by talking about the economic downtown was hard on everyone and when things started looking up in 2009, that some suppliers could still not recover. Suppliers were forced to make cutbacks which made it very difficult for them to stay in business. Some of the larger manufacturers decided to help their suppliers by sharing their financial expertise, capital, and their lean manufacturing knowledge to help pull them out of the rut. In today’s world, a shared value approach is beginning to take course. The article begins discussing Toyota, Hyundai Motor Company and Samsung. These companies are looked at

Communication is the most important aspect of conducting business. Toyota must improve their means of communication and it must start at the beginning of the customer/supplier relationship. The Process Flow chart will identify the communication process between Toyota and supplier is further updated to show improved processes. Expectations should be established to ensure that suppliers are providing the quality products that represent the Toyota brand. Currently, Toyota has sacrificed quality and safety to meet the demands of the customers. Toyota must take into consideration the market they enter and the major players that exist to provide the support necessary. Toyota uses the Annual Purchasing Policy process to communicate their expectations to suppliers. “The purpose of supplier expectations is to highlight key priority activities and emphasize broader, more philosophical issues universal to all suppliers (ToyotaSupplier.com, 2012).” In addition, “individual expectations, on the other hand, are developed uniquely for each supplier and include specific targets in the key areas of quality, delivery, value improvement and minority sourcing (ToyotaSupplier.com,

Toyota and Honda succeeded in constructing effective supplier relationships because of the methods they used for it. In article they were the following:

Major suppliers of Toyota are headquartered in Toyota City within a fifty-mile radius. It is important to be close as they make all those deliveries every day since Toyota follows JIT technique. Therefore, suppliers have close relationship and adopt Toyota’s production system that improves coordination with Toyota. Once the automobiles are produced at the final assembly line, it moves to the final inspection and driven off from the factory to the marshaling yard where the vehicles are prepared for shipment. Thereafter, the vehicles produced are shipped to the dealers through distribution model which is referred as outbound logistics. The distribution model differs according to various regions. Generally, vehicles are transported by trains and trucks to the local/domestic dealers here large vessels are used to ship vehicles to dealers in other countries. Importantly, Toyota has partnerships with its suppliers and dealers and holds proportion of their ownership stocks which make their supply chain operate effectively and

Toyota is able to offer competitive advantage through its valuable resources that makes it able to attract and retain best suppliers and also its rare and unique staff. Also, Toyota’s competitors cannot manage and develop their HR at the same cost that Toyota does.

One factor that adds to the success of Toyota’s supply chain is their relationship with their suppliers and how they do business with those suppliers. Toyota does not simply give their supply contracts to the highest bidder; instead they work incredibly closely with their suppliers so that they can get the highest quality products possible. Toyota uses long-term, just-in-time contracts with all of their suppliers (Winfield & Hay, 1997). Toyota does not engage in any kind of mutual contracts, such as buy-back or revenue-sharing; however, they do take multiple steps to ensure a mutual benefit when they pair up with a supplier. Toyota invests in their suppliers to help them develop products (Liker & Choi, 2004). They also ensure that they share information with their suppliers in a structured fashion. They believe that targeted information leads to results and they ensure that specific communication is relayed to their suppliers at set times and in set ways (Liker & Choi, 2004). Perhaps the most unique aspect of Toyota’s relationships with their suppliers is that they embark on joint improvement ventures together. They set up study groups with suppliers to help both parties learn how to improve operations and send executives and engineers to the supply plants to help them improve processes (Liker & Choi, 2004). These kinds of benefits are described in the contracts Toyota keeps with their suppliers (Toyota Supplier, 2011). The close relationships that

Toyota is committed in developing its supplier base, which more closely reflects the diversity of its customers and the diversity of its team members who build Toyota vehicles. Having a diverse supplier base enables it to contribute to the economic well being of all its segments. Also, it recognize that partnering with suppliers who provide a diversity of ideas in addition to delivering manufacturing support, goods and services that creates a significant competitive advantage for Toyota.