Pros And Cons Of Keeping The Drinking Age To 18

The hotel on the corner of bitter and sweet is a novel written by Jamie Ford. This book takes place in between 1940s to 1990s, during the World War II. This is when the Japanese’s were forced into concentration camps. Some were temporarily to live in horse stalls. This is a fictional story between a Japanese girl and a Chinese boy. Jamie Ford uses characters to show most relationships can survive anything.

The law that raised the drinking age happens to be very unstable. To begin with “a portion of the American public today is arguing that if a member of the U.S. military is old enough to die fighting for his or her country, then they ought to be mature enough to enjoy a beer” (“License”). An eighteen year old can die for their country, vote for politicians, and decide what they are doing with their future, but are not allowed to drink alcohol. It stands out that eighteen year olds can also obtain cigarettes that can lead to various types of cancer but cannot enjoy an alcoholic beverage. Continuing on, another reason that raising the drinking age is unjust is that binge drinking continues to occur, which is when one consumes 4 or 5 drinks in a row: “binge drinking is unchanged from its levels of 1979; that among non college women it has increased by 20 percent; and that among college women it has increased by 40 percent” (McCardell). If

The debate for the legal drinking age of eighteen or twenty-one has been a topic of discussion for a long time. Personally, most people support the side that they should just leave the legal age at twenty-one. There are many reasons as to why people would support this side of the argument. If the drinking age gets lowered to eighteen, it would lead to cause more car related accidents, there will be an easier access to alcohol, and that it would be medically irresponsible to drink at a younger age.

In “Aristotle on the Good life,” Elliott Sober begins the chapter by saying that there are various ethical theories that explains how people are obligated to follow several ethical principles that indicates how people should act in certain situations. Then, he introduces some ethical theories. One is called utilitarianism, which argues that whenever people act in one way and there is another way that they can achieve greater happiness, it is wrong to do that action. The second theory argues that people need to treat others morally and respectfully, which comes Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who have a major influence on contemporary philosophy. Lastly, there is a theory that argues that people are free to act if they do not invade other

The drinking age should be lowered because those under 21 can buy guns, vote, and join the Military at 18. Since 18 is the legal adult age, people should have the right to make their own decision to buy alcohol. It is important because colleges and universities are allowing alcohol consumption which legally might help cut down alcohol related deaths in colleges.

Alcohol. Most adults drink it and it is present in the majority of history. When Prohibition was enforced the ban only stayed active from 1920 to 1933 and during that time alcohol was still sold illegally. It’s obvious to everyone that it’s not something we should drink, but that doesn’t stop people. Although, there’s debate over whether the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18. Lowering the drinking age would be terrible idea because it would interfere with brain development, increase alcohol consumption, lead to more bad behaviours later in life and also increase traffic fatalities.

In the United States you are legally an adult at age 18. That entails being able to vote for our president, get married, and even join the military and go to war, but with all these things you still can’t drink legally. The present law says that an 18 year old can go to war where they may lose their life for their country, but you still have to be 21 to drink alcohol. If we allow people to be an legal adult at 18 we should allow them to make that decision to drink.

I believe that the drinking age should not be lowered from 21 to 18. I believe it shouldn’t be lowered because people at that age are not mature enough to handle alcohol. Another reason is because if some people are drinking at a lower age already, people from an even lower age would start drinking too. If they miss use alcohol it could result in severe consequences. That’s why I think the drinking age should stay the same.

Ten thousand four hundred ninety-seven. This is the number of people who died in 2016 from drunk-driving related accidents (“Motor Vehicle Safety”). People have brought up the debate about lowering the drinking age once again. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 originally raised it from eighteen to twenty-one years old. The government convinced everyone to raise each of theirs by threatening to lower their state’s federal transportation funds. Some states have exceptions to this law in appropriate situations ("Background Of The Issue - Minimum Legal Drinking Age - Procon.Org."). Lawmakers should not approve of lowering the minimum legal drinking age because it would otherwise result in more deaths, higher risk for younger kids,

It has been a rising issue within the past century to have the drinking age set at 21, but many people are more in favor of having the age set at 18. For instance, “’Raising the drinking age to 21 was passed with the very best of intentions, but it’s had the very worst of outcomes,’ stated by David J. Hanson, an alcohol policy expert” (Johnson). Many people believe that having the drinking age set at 21 was a smart idea, but it has caused many more deaths and injuries over the years. Most of these fatalities are cause from people who are underage and choose to consume alcohol. Again, “Libertarian groups and some conservative economic foundations, seeing the age limits as having been extorted by Washington, have long championed lowering the drinking age” (Johnson). These groups see that keeping the drinking age set at 21 is dangerous as it causes more problems to the Untied States. If the drinking age was lowered, or set at 18, there would not be such unforgiving outcomes, like deaths and lifelong injuries, which are usually caused from people who are under the age of 21 drinking alcohol. Although there are numerous groups that are fighting to keep the age

The legal age of drinking should be raised to twenty-one as it will be beneficial for all Canadians. Primarily, this act would promote an increase of security for young adults that on occasion fail to realize the repercussions of alcohol. Studies have shown, taken from International Survey Associates, that adolescent brains aren’t fully developed at age eighteen. In fact, there is reason to believe, experts representatives from Mental Health Daily explain, that our brains aren’t fully developed until well in our twenties; age twenty-five more specifically. That is due to the synaptic pruning, a process by which brain synapses are selectively eliminated which peaks during puberty and can remain that way for many

Could this make our country safer, or would it make it more dangerous?As most of you know, the legal alcohol consumption age is 21, but what would like be like if the Government lowered it to 18. Lowering the legal alcohol consumption age would make our children safe with the use of alcohol.

The attempted attack by an armed individual on a high-speed train in Europe has concerned the United States about vulnerability of rail passengers and whether present security measures are acceptable. Airports are guarded with several layers of security including airport police and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) personnel using metal detectors and full-body scanners, but a lot of railroad stations have nominal scrutiny for passengers boarding trains. Bigger stations have armed Amtrak officers and bomb-sniffing dogs. Passengers and baggage are randomly searched at a few of the chief rail centers, like Union Station in Washington and Pennsylvania Station in New York. Even so, these measures would hardly

The question of the century, what is better; having the drinking age at 21 or at 18? Many people think it should be 21, based on the fact that people are more mature and the brain is closer to being fully developed than at 18. Those are the only two arguments I have heard cased about having the drinking age at 21. But let us be honest, at 18 many people can be mature as well, and there are plenty of 21 year olds who are less mature than the ages younger than them, so honestly the age difference argument is crap. With the brain fully developed doesn't make sense, because in Europe with having the drinking age at 16, students in the European countries are of the majority smarter than students in America. Yes, having the drinking age runs

Well, you are telling me that I can legally kill someone at the age of eighteen, while I sign up with the military and go to war but I can’t have a sip of alcohol. Due to this none senseless situation, age should be equaled. In other words, if voting and military sign up is eighteen, then drinking should also be eighteen. Besides at the age of eighteen you are legally an adult. Why can’t we drink then? Drinking age in Australia is eighteen, and in UK is as low as sixteen in restaurants. Studies have showed that those teens/adults are perfectly fine. In fact, Dr. Ruth Engs; professor of Applied Health Sciences at Indiana University in Bloomington, uses this examples to propose the following: “……the drinking age be lowered to about 18 or 19 and permit those of legal age to consume in socially controlled environment such as restaurants and official school and university functions” (direct quote from Dr. Engs).