Pros And Cons Of Keeping The Drinking Age To 18

Eighteen should be the legal age of adults in United States for using alcohol. There are three reasons to support this contention. First of all, the development of people’s brain will not be completed until people become 25 years old. Therefore, although drinking alcohol may cause some affects the brain,

In 1984 Ronald Reagan proposed a new law that declared that the legal drinking age must raised up to 21 instead of the age of 18. The law was forced upon the states by threatening them by stating that the government will reduce their highway funding until the states passed the law. Of course all the states eventually change their legal drinking age to 21. Some critics believe that this law’s results have been very successful, however the law possesses many insecurities, but certain programs can be arranged to help educate teenagers on alcohol.

It has been a rising issue within the past century to have the drinking age set at 21, but many people are more in favor of having the age set at 18. For instance, “’Raising the drinking age to 21 was passed with the very best of intentions, but it’s had the very worst of outcomes,’ stated by David J. Hanson, an alcohol policy expert” (Johnson). Many people believe that having the drinking age set at 21 was a smart idea, but it has caused many more deaths and injuries over the years. Most of these fatalities are cause from people who are underage and choose to consume alcohol. Again, “Libertarian groups and some conservative economic foundations, seeing the age limits as having been extorted by Washington, have long championed lowering the drinking age” (Johnson). These groups see that keeping the drinking age set at 21 is dangerous as it causes more problems to the Untied States. If the drinking age was lowered, or set at 18, there would not be such unforgiving outcomes, like deaths and lifelong injuries, which are usually caused from people who are under the age of 21 drinking alcohol. Although there are numerous groups that are fighting to keep the age

In over 100 countries across the world, the act of legally possessing and consuming alcohol is permissible below the age of 21, most often within the age range of 18-20. Nevertheless, there are many additional countries such as Spain and Haiti, which enforce a minimum age of 16 years among

There are several controversies in the world today, but one that really catches my attention is on the topic of whether or not the drinking age in the United States should be lowered from 21 to 18. Many people have debated about this topic for several years, and there are several different opinions on this topic. Some people think it is dangerous to lower the drinking age; some people support it. Some children think it is stupid to lower the drinking age; some children support it. However, I strongly believe that the legal drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18 for several reasons, such as 18 year olds are allowed to do several other adult activities, other countries have the legal age at 21, and people who are under the age of 18 are still going to drink alcohol whether it is illegal or not.

Supporters of the drinking age at eighteen or nineteen say that it will cause young adults to drink in more controlled environments. Supposedly current underage drinkers would no longer drink in unmonitored, or secretive places (Engs). People will still drink wherever they want. People will still drink as much as they want. People will still drink with whomever they want. Eighteen, nineteen, and twenty year olds might start to drink in less closed-off places, but then younger kids will drink in secretive places (ProCon.org). Enthusiasts of the lower MLDA also argue that eighteen year olds get to make other important life decisions, so why should they not be able to drink? They can join the army, get married, and vote at age eighteen, so it is sometimes thought that eighteen year olds have the maturity to drink alcohol (Engs). However, the drinking age of twenty-one is put in place because of specific behaviors at that age. It is the same for other rights, such as twelve for a hunting license, sixteen for a driver’s license, and thirty-five to run for President of the United States (ProCon.org). Although they are mature enough for some responsibilities, eighteen year olds are not developed enough to handle the responsibility of

Raising the Drinking Age: Pro The legal age of drinking should be raised to twenty-one as it will be beneficial for all Canadians. Primarily, this act would promote an increase of security for young adults that on occasion fail to realize the repercussions of alcohol. Studies have shown, taken from International Survey Associates, that adolescent brains aren’t fully developed at age eighteen. In fact, there is reason to believe, experts representatives from Mental Health Daily explain, that our brains aren’t fully developed until well in our twenties; age twenty-five more specifically. That is due to the synaptic pruning, a process by which brain synapses are selectively eliminated which peaks during puberty and can remain that way for many

There are many sides to one argument just like in whether the drinking age should be lowered. Many people think that it should be lowered, so young adults don’t drink in unsafe or unsupervised environments. Although, many people think that it shouldn’t be lowered because brains aren’t done developing until 22 and drinking can lead to health problems later in life. There are many positives and negatives to lowering the drinking age, but there are also some advantages such as diminishing binge drinking in young adults.

Would raising the legal drinking age to twenty-five years benefit our country from hurting the youth? If a twenty-one-year-old can join the military and can help defend the country, then why not keep the legal drinking age there? The drinking age should not be raised to age twenty-five. There are many important reasons that should be considered first. There are some reasons why; you are a legal adult at twenty-one, most people at the age are already out from under their parents, and maybe even in their third year of college living on their own.

I believe that the drinking age should not be lowered from 21 to 18. I believe it shouldn’t be lowered because people at that age are not mature enough to handle alcohol. Another reason is because if some people are drinking at a lower age already, people from an

The legal age of adulthood in the United States is eighteen. Turning eighteen brings the rights and responsibilities of adulthood to vote, serve on juries, get married, sign contracts, even be prosecuted as adults (Chiappetta). As an adult he or she should have the right to make their own decisions about alcohol consumption. Once someone turns eighteen he/she is indirectly encouraged to join the united states military which includes risking one's life, fighting a war overseas, so the people who choose to do that should be able to come home and enjoy a beer in the comforts of their home. Proponents of lowering the minimum legal drinking age from

In today’s society alcohol has been a very big topic to discuss. From the news channels talking about the possibility that alcohol may have been a factor in the accident, peer pressure, and television commercials. There are many pros and cons to changing the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) from 21 to 18.

Could this make our country safer, or would it make it more dangerous?As most of you know, the legal alcohol consumption age is 21, but what would like be like if the Government lowered it to 18. Lowering the legal alcohol consumption age would make our children safe with the use of alcohol.

The question of the century, what is better; having the drinking age at 21 or at 18? Many people think it should be 21, based on the fact that people are more mature and the brain is closer to being fully developed than at 18. Those are the only two arguments I have heard cased about having the drinking age at 21. But let us be honest, at 18 many people can be mature as well, and there are plenty of 21 year olds who are less mature than the ages younger than them, so honestly the age difference argument is crap. With the brain fully developed doesn't make sense, because in Europe with having the drinking age at 16, students in the European countries are of the majority smarter than students in America. Yes, having the drinking age runs

Over the years the legal drinking in the United States has been heavily debated. Some people argue that the legal age to drink should be 18 or 19 because people at that age are recognized as adults; while others argue that the drinking age should be 21 because people who are able to drink should be more mature and have their lives better planned out. Although people are legally adults at 18, they are not yet mature adults; in fact, according to NRP “emerging science about brain development suggests that most people don't reach full maturity until the age 25” (“Brain”). Before earning the right to legally drink, people should allow their bodies to fully developed and have a better knowledge of how to organize their lives. The drinking age should remain at 21 because if teens were allowed to drink, they could do harm to their underdeveloped bodies, the progress of decreasing the number of teenage and underage drinkers would be lost, the number of car accidents would increase, and teens would be more likely to experiment with other toxic drugs. By merely keeping the legal drinking age at 21, hundreds of lives would be saved.