Pros And Cons Of Lowering The Voting Age

Why? It will give politicians a real true reason to respect the desire of the adolescents wanting to vote. Lowering the voting age could and would be a great idea. This is why the government should consider lowering the voting age to 16 .So young adults, teenagers and adolescent whatever you may call them. Get a chance to choose the right politician in the political election to help then now and later in their future life ahead of them to help them be

Although many people of this country have conservative views, having younger voters could conduct positive change in our world and our country economically, socially, and politically. New ideas and change are always beneficial in a country that is considered “developed”. The younger generation is very powerful in the aspect of us being more open minded than past generations which leads us to being more advanced and also being considered successful leaders to developing countries. Younger voters are seen as “ignorant” sometimes or “unaware” but in fact, we pay attention to the world around us more than ever because of how advanced technology has become and allows us to see what is happening throughout the world rather than the issues in just our country. This change in law could lead us to have more technological advances, it could lead to less violence because of fewer differences in opinion, and also we would be creating a less selfish

In lowering the age of voting, I feel as if this would benefit America and the younger generation. It would help the percentage of participation from all age groups, in a positive way. Meaning parents can bring their children to vote alongside of them.

In the 2012 presidential elections those that voted were only 61% of eligible voters. If the voting age were lowered that percentage may not change. There will still be those that are uninterested in the election, or that are unable to vote due to varing reasons.

Many people may have an opinion on what the age limit for voting should be. I believe that lowering the voting age would only benefit our country. First, voting is something people may look forward to doing after their eighteenth birthday. Second, decreasing the legal voting age from eighteen to sixteen could not only increase the number of voters but this could also balance out the percentages of elderly and younger votes.

To increase voting numbers without lower the legal voting age is very simple. The issue is not age it is participation. There are many solutions to this issue the artical mentioned earlier List a few "Allowing people to vote from home would raise the

The primary agruement is that it will either in or decrease the voter turn out. If we do lower the age required to vote it will increaseour numberal turn out of people, but decrease our percentages. And the percentages are what is really looked at when compareing to othere countries. So lowering will only hurt it.

The current voting age of 18 should not be lower to 16 because youngers have other interest rather than politics, it decrease the percentage of voting participation, and leads to a bad influence from adults in youngers' decisions.Thereby, there would be a negative impact in the elections.

There has been a debate about lowering the U.S.A's legal voting age from 18 to 16 years old. There are some people are against it, arguing that the younger generation shows no interest in politics. Others believe that lowering the voting age by two years could potentionally show positive results.

After reading both passages about keeping or lowering the voting age, I have come to a conclusion to keep the voting age at 18. I agree that lowering the voting age would decrease the percentage of participation.

At 16 many teenagers are not concerned with politics. They are still in the "that has nothing to do with me" mindset. Teens tend to not look past the next social event or school football game far enough to care or learn about the impact their vote could have on our entire country. They tend to follow along with what their friends are doing. When I was 16 my group of friends was my unknowing and unreliable source of information. Therefore, allowing 16 year olds to vote would likely lead

First, lowering the voting age would decrease voting percentages. A U.S. Census Bureau report shows that only 38% of voters were in the 18-24 age group in 2012. From personal experience, I know that many students and young adults are not interested in voting. Therefore, voting percentages would lower at a fast rate if the age was changed to below 18.

The U.S. could both benifit and suffer from the lowering of voting ages. For example, the US could benifit by having more voters participate in various elections, or lowering the voting age could icrease stress among younger crowds.

There are many valid opinions towards voting at the age of sixteen. Many believe the voting age should be decreased due to other responsibilities in which many sixteen-year-olds already have, such as being able to drive or being employed. However, some may be against this issue due to the influences a 16 year may encounter when voting, such as voting for who their parents or friends vote for or lacking maturity.

I believe that as an upcoming adult, the voting age should be lowered down to the age of 16. When those teenagers vote at 16, they're voting on their futures. When being thought about, around that age, students are being taught about our government. Personally I feel that if you are old enough to drive, you should be old enough to vote.