Pros And Cons Of Majority Rules System

These restrictions on the overall liberty allowed in the United States include limits on freedom of speech

Thus it can be seen that governmental freedom has limitations just as it has privileges. Everyone is allowed freedom of speech, but if an individual were to yell fire in a public building they would be thrown in jail. Thus implying that freedom of speech has limitations. Despite this, governmental freedom is not the only form of freedom that exist. There lies an inherent freedom that allows citizens of these countries to revolt and overthrow their government at anytime they deem necessary because they have the freedom and knowledge to set up meetings and do

Neil Gaiman once said, “The current total of countries in the world with First Amendments is one. You have guaranteed the freedom of speech. Other countries don’t have that.” At the time of the amendments’ creation, a vast majority of operating countries had not yet granted their people such freedoms. Granting every citizen of the United States this right seemed to have been an important landmark in this nation’s history. Along with others, this right is declared to the people in the first amendment of the constitution. The first amendment is the most important because it grants people freedom of speech, prohibits prior restraint, and declares the right to peaceable assembly.

A certain amount of interference with individuals' right occurs on a daily basis and is considered acceptable in a busy, interactive society.

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution, an alteration that covers three rights, one of which is the privilege to flexibility of expression. Under this, there dwells the flexibility of press. It guarantees that individuals are allowed to impart through the method for media and dispersal without legislative restrictions. Nonetheless, if the administration yearnings to meddle in one's demeanor, the legislature can do as such, yet just with legitimate avocation. In such cases, a court case is essential. The Sixth Amendment gives the denounced the privilege to a quick and open trial by the fair jury. The denounced has the privilege to be educated of the nature and reason of allegation furthermore be gone up against with the

he First Amendment protects rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. It’s most basic component is freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Which gives freedom of speech to press to express themselves without government interference or regulation (Hawkins, 2012). Moreover, when we’re censoring ourselves we are willingly giving away our right to free speech. In today’s fast-paced world with so many social media sites and internet. It is very easy and common for someone or media to write or post an article about someone else’s private life.

seen its fair share of the courtroom, this often controversial issue is best displayed in

Everyone is born free in this world and those are only the situations in which they are born, that make one slave or the ruler. In spite of social status and the economic standing of a being everyone wants and should be allowed to express their views, feelings and ideas. It is in nature of humans to experience the wonders of the world and to have the urge to observe and think about the wonders and express the ideas in a certain ways. Another thing that is also certain about the nature of the people that different people look at the same thing in different ways. American constitution is the one that respects the people and about the views and ideas of the people and their right to live and express their ideas freely. The constitution that was made by our fathers not only discusses the issues that are pertaining on collective level, but also, about the common issues and concerns of the people and one of them is freedom of speech. It is also the right of every free person in this world to have freedom of speech and to have his own personal standing. Constitution of United States also considers the right of the people to play their part and have their own view about everything that is happening around them and gives them the right to express them. This paper is also focused on the issue of freedom of speech, but, is targeted to how this right is being guaranteed and exercised at workplaces.

Ever since the advent of democratic systems of political decision-making in Ancient Greece, one of the primary concerns about democratic functioning has been the principle of majority rule. Whether a majoritarian system is divisive in its essence, paves the way for demagoguery, or obstructs minority groups from having a fair say in public affairs, criticisms of majority rule have and still persist nowadays. Indeed, notorious political figures such as Hamilton, Madison or Mill expressed concerns about the potential threat of a tyranny of the majority which would infringe on citizens’ fundamental rights. Moreover and recently, the outcome of the Brexit referendum has renewed the debate around majority rule and its flaws. However, within the context of the contemporary world in which democracy prevails, majority rule is the norm many states follow. Why is this so; how can majority rule be defended and what are its limits? In order to provide an articulate and coherent answer, it is first necessary to lay down some premises to the functioning of the democratic process. Then, after arguing for majority rule, its flaws shall be assessed before eventually drawing potential alternatives from such dysfunctions.

Throughout the 1830s and 1840s he led a crusade against abolitionist and those antislavery legislators who sought to limit the expansionism of slavery into the western territories. When he was in a Senate after reading two anti-slavery petitions sent by abolitionist groups he said “unless it be speedily stopped, it will spread and work upwards till it brings the two great sections of the Union into deadly conflict”. This speech would later represent the political and racial ideology of the South. He proclaimed that slavery- not freedom for all- defined the union. He thought that slave labor formed “the most solid and durable foundation on which to rear free and stable political institutions”. Nullification in the future debate over slavery was clear with the ability to define the terms of their membership in the union, states would be able to deny the federal government all regulatory power over slavery.

The right to express ones opinions without censorship or restraint can be considered as a basic provision enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. To elaborate, the first amendment to the constitution prohibit the legislative arm of government in making of any law abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press and prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. Post this amendment, there have been several cases where the Supreme Court has been required to interpret or make a decision to uphold its provisions. One of such landmark cases is the Hazelwood School District vs Kuhlmeier. The case involved two articles that were refused publication by a principal in a student newspaper. One of the articles dealt with the experience of students whose parents are divorce and the other with teenage pregnancy.

Communication is a key point when a nation wants to thrive sadly enough communist countries, such as Burma, North Korea, Turkmenistan and Libya, where its illegal for people or the media to talk negative about its government. Thanks to Americas first amendment the American people are able to speak freely without being silenced by the government, something that people should use to unify and understand other people like Boorstin did when writing “The decline of Radicalism.”

“Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right. It reinforces all other human rights, allowing society to develop and progress. The ability to express our opinion and speak freely is essential to bring about change in society.” Freedom of Speech grants you the right and privilege to speak your mind without facing any type of consequence . I strongly believe that censorship and the lack of free speech can and will cause a negative effect on our world.

With freedom of speech can come violence, a common reason for nations and governments to deny this right. Some societies, such as Singapore, agree that by enforcing certain laws that abide the government keep said nation “orderly and relatively crime-free” (Reyes, par. 3). Freedom of speech can also mean

The constitution nominally guarantees freedom of speech and the press (But it is not implemented in practice)