We often here about outsourcing of goods and services from the United States to other countries around the world. This method of lowering costs has its benefits, as well as its drawbacks. Corporations are constantly looking for ways to increase profit margins, but when turning to foreign nations for this cause, the ethical line can become blurry and possibly crossed. These issues are complex, and commonplace in many countries across the globe, and for a great example we turn to the Maquiladoras of Mexico, our neighbor in North America. Maquiladoras are pretty simple to understand. These are simply Mexican assembly plants that manufacture finished goods and export them when completed. These plants are owned by non-Mexican corporations, mostly …show more content…
After seeing “Maquilapolis,” it becomes apparent that one would simply need to show others this documentary series to refute these accusations. The example with Lourdes stands out. The river by her home completely changed colors due to pollution. The chemicals seep into the water and bring harm to the people using it. Ash was even seen to harm the eyes of one of the interviewers. Much of the struggles fall on deaf ears. The demonstrations shown are clearly driven by real problems, yet reality is different from the visions of higher ups. Vincente talked about his daughter being electrocuted in the street due to exposed wires. These dangers are shocking and cannot be dismissed at all. Empty political promises bring hope momentarily, but eventually fall flat, crushing those who need help the most. These women live in fear of unemployment due to relocation to Asia, something that saves a couple dollars for corporations, but ruins lives. The last point is the politician claiming the people are in good shape. This really highlights the problem in a nutshell. Either through ignorance or denial, those with power seem to think everything is ok when this isn’t the case at all. It is not difficult to see this either, you just have to look around to understand the problems at hand. Overall, maquiladoras can provide benefits to both sides of the exchange, but right now, the United States is doing a lot more taking than giving. The exploitation of the Mexican people is disgusting to see, and changes must be implemented, but many just don’t want to face the music. We can deny all we want like the official in the video, but it takes about five minutes with these women to see just how much we must fix. Maquiladoras are an interesting part of foreign affairs, and if the right changes are
1. Do you think the expansion of maquiladoras has been more of a benefit or a harm to Mexico? Why?
I feel the article explores the political conflicts that arise when aspirations collide across a generational divide marked by sharply different political agendas. The character Tricia is a young, single mother whose family and financial difficulties reflect the circumstances of the urban poor. Furthermore, she delivers a compelling performance in scenes that reflect just how city policies affect individuals.
These people are so poor that they can’t afford to stay in one place and work. They don’t have any form of a permanent residence. These people are often extremely hard for interviewers to find in order to spread awareness because they move so frequently. They make little to no money working and their jobs are often taken or sent off to other countries which is why they are forced to move so often to that they can find new jobs. Ehrenreich managed to track and find a couple of people that worked low paying jobs and for a time they couldn’t afford to settle down. “This spring, I managed to track down a couple of people I had met while working on my 2001 book, “Nickel and Dimed,” in which I worked in low-wage jobs. I woman I called Melissa in the book was still working at Wal-Mart, though in nine years, her wages had risen to $10 an hour from $7” (322). Hard working people work for wages that barely allow them to provide for themselves. They might get a raise but that’s only after they have been working the same job for several years and the raise isn’t even by much. They are forced to work for low pay in an attempt to stay
many of the women see themselves as objects of labor. For example in the documentary
The Maquiladora Assembly Facility – This facility is used to assemble imported U.S.-manufactured components into final products for sale mainly in the U.S. Seeing as the majority of sales occur in the U.S., this facility generates its revenues in USD.
The war on drugs officially started in 1972 with Richard Nixon leading the charge. Nixon called drugs, “public enemy number one” because of the rising heroin addiction in Vietnam veterans. The Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs revamped by Nixon was founded in 1968 under Johnson . By 1972 Nixon starts the office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement, to create a joint task force in the federal and state level, and resulted in the end of the French connection . The French connection was the Heroin drug trade that started from Turkey, were opium farmed legally to drug companies, sold underground, and ended in the streets of America, the products put on French ships were around 200 pounds . In response to the rivalry between BNDD and U.S. customs,
corporations to use cheap overseas labor” my first thoughts were yes because of my personal beliefs. But upon further thought and through discovery, I realized that from a business point of view we as a nation should still help promote economic globalization. In order to do so we need to outsource production and encourage trade. However, because we are fiscally involved in another country’s economy that doesn’t give American corporations the right to implement our laws and standards into other countries’ business practices and laws. Just because we see child labor, unfair wages, and violating overtime as immoral, doesn’t mean that the host county does. However global labor standards need to be unified.
Along with the money that it brings the Maquiladoras, it saves the capitalists money on labor costs and import and export taxes. The capitalists save money because they are getting labor for $16.00 a day per worker. They would not be able to do that with American laborers.
As a major contributor to the global economy, Mexico’s sweatshops have contributed to the United States’ wealth and economic growth. It is the unfortunate truth that many individual workers have suffered as a result of this prosperity. The sweatshops, known as maquiladoras, are in debate because of the ethical and lawful reasoning behind their existence and conditions. How can we, as a First-world nation, allow such industries to exist where people are denied basic and fundamental human rights? What, if any, laws and regulations are put into place for the maquiladoras? Are these laws and regulations hindering, harmful, or helpful? Are they enforced emphatically? If not, how does this affect development? After
•P5- Reich gave an example of maquiladora factories owned by American but have foreign cheaper producers.
“Is labor outsourcing to developing countries a legitimate business strategy that can be handled without risk of running into a sweatshop scandal?” outsourcing of production facilities and
* Labor outsourcing is a good strategy to decrease the labor cost. But it associates with many issues. Once outsourcing is done, the MNC cannot just stay behind. The MNC should carefully supervise on the working conditions, safety, wages, working hours, gender discrimination and human rights violations. If any of these factors going wrong and leads to sweatshop conditions, it directly affect on the reputation of the MNC. If once the name or the brand is blacklisted, it is very hard to repair the damage. Therefore, the risk of outsourcing is high.
Employing Mexicans for such minimal wages implies a peculiar kind of a 20th century imperialism: GM is able to extract enormous profits and to become the world’s largest corporation by super-exploiting labor in a country less well developed and economically influenced by the USA.
I have always been interested in fashion in a creative way in not just my life, but fashion has also impacted my academic journey. From an early age, I knew belonged in and wanted to be a part of the world of fashion, to not only build a life around Fashion but to make a career for myself in the Fashion Industry.
Volunteering: The great experience no one can afford to lose. Opposers say, mandatory community service can have several negative effects on students. “Community service hours are impressive additions to college applications and can provide a student with a great sense of accomplishment; however, the mandatory hours will have many negative consequences” (Cydney Hayes, 2012). Many students are barely even passing the regular school curriculum, and opposers believe that adding the additional load of mandatory service hours will discourage teens from even wanting to graduate. Also mandatory service is usually assigned by a court as punishment to delinquents. “In a small number of cases, community service is