Pros And Cons Of Miscarriage Of Justice

1782 Words8 Pages
As we all may realize once a crime is committed the suspect is charged and then sentenced based off the judge’s decision. As we recall a crime is an unlawful act punishable by a state or other authority. In other words, those who commit minor or major crimes get incarcerated depending how serious is crime. Also, in some cases suspects receive supervised probation and must be watched periodically by an assigned officer. It is understandable that those who commit crimes are held accountable for their actions. Over the past decade families have been destroyed after knowing their significant other will be in jail for a long period of time based off a wrongful conviction. Over the past years victims have been incarcerated wrongfully on charges such as rape or murder. In many cases the victims were coerced to speak, confessions were manipulated to make the detective look good, or the officer yelled and smuggled their face so that the victim can forcefully say anything. A wrongful conviction known as a miscarriage of justice primarily is the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. During the late years of 1980 it was truly a year of miscarriage of justice for a family of five teens who were arrested and charged with raping a woman in a New York City park. According to an article published by PBS.org
“On April 20, 1989, the body of a woman barely clinging to life is discovered in Central Park. Within days, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond
Open Document