Pros And Cons Of Moving Back The Gold Standard

Hamza Rashid Government and Economics On April 5, 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive order 6102, to “prohibit the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates.” (Roosevelt, 1933) It required citizens to deliver gold to a Federal Reserve Bank in exchange for cash. Executive Order 6102 was unconstitutional because

During his presidency, William McKinley had many domestic affairs to deal with. Amid the most significant issues, McKinley’s tariff legislation was a big one. Bimetallism was also an important issue. The McKinley administration went after an agreement that would include silver, as a standard European currency. McKinley didn’t like the idea so he began promoting a completely gold-based currency. In 1900, he signed the Gold Standard Act, which officially ended the use of silver as a standard of United States currency and established gold as the only standard. This still affects us today because although no country uses the gold standard, there is a rising support for its reintroduction in the hope of regulating U.S.

The Gold Standard was the framework by which the value of cash was characterized in terms of gold, for which the money could be traded. The Gold Standard ended up being deserted in the Depression of the 1930s. Friedman felt that,“The gold standard is not feasible because the mythology and beliefs required to make it effective do not exist. This conclusion is supported not only by the general historical evidence referred to but also by the specific experience of the United States” ( “The Gold Standard:Please Stop”).Economists who contradict the Gold Standard may perceive what must be accomplished with a specific end goal to make a centrally controlled paper standard better than a decentralized Gold Standard. Milton Friedman poses the key question: "How can we establish a monetary system that is stable, free from irresponsible tinkering, and

The Coinage Act of 1873 was one of the major reasons why the Populist movement started and began forming. There were no real instant effects of the Coinage Act, and not many citizens in America used silver anyway (Friedman). Long term however, the United States would never be the same economically thanks to this monumental legislation. Officially accepting the Gold Standard, the American economy raised the demand for gold immensely, and as a result many gold deposits within America became depleted (Friedman). Consequently, the dollar and employees of America at the time became connected and tied to gold (Friedman). This was not a beneficial relationship, and the United States had become dependent on gold. Add in the fact that gold was being depleted rapidly and the demand for it was growing exponentially

In 1892 Mary E. Lease talks about the low prices in farming and how politicians mislead them and tell them decreasing prices are from overproduction(Document G). Even though Lease thought otherwise data at the time was contrary. Document A shows this. For wheat as production increased price per bushel decreased, for cotton for the most part as production increases the price per pound decreases, for corn from 1870-1885 as production increased price decreased. 1900 in the outliner because production increased and so did price. This is way in Document J farmers are against the gold standard. Big cities were for the gold standard because it helped with industrialization but farmers were against it for a plethora of reasons. Their complaints were gold's inflexibility. When farmers brought their crop to market in the fall, an inflexible currency would cause a shortage of money which would drive down prices. Document H talks about the unpredictability of farming and how this can affect prices of the product. And based on the price of the product it depends how much food a family can keep for themselves. So not only is the production of the product to sell unpredictable but so is the welfare of the family based

To understand why a penny does not fulfill its role as currency anymore, In the beginning of the use of fiat currency, many governments backed the value of the currency with gold. For a while, thirty five United States Dollars could be traded for 1 Troy ounce of gold at a bank. Today however, the USD is no longer backed by gold. Most money today is “just worthless paper”, and if the government endorsing that money fails, it turns that currency into useless paper. (This is causes hyperinflation and recently happened to the Zimbabwean dollar.)

With the onset of the war, the stability of the relationship between Britain, France, and Germany – which the Gold Standard was dependent on – crippled (lecture, 10/13). During the interwar period, 1914-1945, the lack of coordination between economies led to a liquidity shortage while the nations held a floating exchange rate. The interwar period saw a breakdown in international monetary coordination – proving that a floating economy was doomed for failure (FLB 264). Outside of the lack of international coordination, the Gold Standard had other downfalls leading to its demise. For example, national governments had no authority to stimulate their country’s economies in times of need. Moreover, the fixed economy limits foreign trade, hurting the country’s industries (lecture,

Then in 1929. one of great disasters opposing the gold standard was the Great Depression.The world economy started to fail, causing Great Britain to abandon the Gold Bullion Standard in 1931. This event was used as evidence to say that the gold standard was advantageous in the long run, but under the stress short term shocks and depression, it was incompatible. The only way to get back on the gold standard was to first get off the gold standard, restabilize the economy, and then return to the gold standard. Such events that pointed to the inadequacies of the system was, in 1933 Franklin Roosevelt prohibits the public to hold gold in order to solve a national gold run. A run is when a large amount of people try to withdraw at the same time. When there isn’t

Once off the gold standard, the Federal Reserve became free to engage in such money creation, because the gold standard limited the flexibility of the central banks' monetary policy by limiting their ability to expand the money supply. In the US, the Federal Reserve was required by law to have gold backing 40% of its demand notes. Now free of the gold standards restrictions, all it takes to create money or lend money is typing numbers into a computer. No limit to the creation of currency results in debt that becomes hard to control, and that’s exactly what has happened, and the proof is today’s economy. Right now, the United States’ debt equals approximately $17.075 trillion.

So, should United States tried to go back in a gold standard economy? Yes and no, although there are new forms of currency going around the world. The

“A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy, and a weak economy leads to a weak nation.” – Ross Perot. The words of the 1992 Presidential candidate still ring true today, and in fact they have since the abolition of the gold standard in 1971 by President Nixon. Ever since that warm August day the United States has been on a death plunge into immaculate amounts of debt. However, by the establishment of the silver standard in the way I will explain to you today, makes it clear that action on such a policy must be taken.

What if the debt that the United States is in, was gone? For the United States the paper standard just isn’t good enough any more. It has caused the United States 21.09 trillion dollars worth of debt. Changing our standard from paper money to gold could make the United States

This made the policy fine until WW 1 when the gold standard was torn up in 1914 because countries needed to print money to fight World War I. When World War I was over and the world entered the early 1920s, countries wanted to go back to the gold standard but they didn’t quite know how to do it. Before World War I started with parity, meaning there was a certain amount of gold and a certain amount of paper money backed by gold. Then, the paper money supply was doubled. That left only two choices if countries wanted to go back to a gold standard. They could’ve doubled the price of gold — basically cut the value of their currency in half or they could’ve cut the money supply in half. They could’ve done either one but they had to get to the parity

It is my opinion that without the federal government, there would not only be chaos across the board in the private sector, but also in every citizens personal and professional life. With no federal government to back our currency, what would it be worth? How would we exchange the old currency for the new, and who would set the exchange rate? There would be no federal taxes, no regulations on trade – at the interstate and international levels. Who would step in to help resolve matters that involve a transfer across state or country lines? There would also be no federal income tax deducted from our paychecks. While this perhaps seems beneficial, consider this against the certainty that Social Security and Medicare would be over. This would not

Eight decades has elapsed since the outbreak of the Great Depression, but the continuing mystery of its cause keep provoking academic debates among scholars from various fields. Eichengreen and Temin joint the debates by linking the gold-standard ideology with the cause of the Great Depression. They content that because of