Pros And Cons Of Moving To The SAT In Illinois

Abolishing Standardized Testing Millions of standardized tests are sent out each year. High school students are bound to take either the ACT or the SAT, whether it would be their junior or senior year. By taking one of these tests, it could get the student a scholarship or a good placement, etc... Many college admissions require the students to take the standardized tests to attend their college even though it is an unreliable way to accurately measure their IQ. Although many people would argue from their past experiences that testing is a helpful way to learn, the effects of standardized testing is more mentally harmful than beneficial in all school environments; this includes students, teachers, and the school itself.

I agree with the idea to lessen the importance of any type of standardized test. Just as Stu Schmill, dean of admissions at MIT, stated, “’I do believe that most

There are plenty of differences between SAT and the ACT. One difference is that you can score higher on the SAT because it has a higher grading scale. Next, the ACT is more straightforward but has a lower grading scale. Also, the SAT has a stronger focus on vocabulary more than the ACT. Lastly, the SAT is broken up into more sections and is more spaced out. There are so many differences between SAT and ACT these are just a couple of them.

There has been an SAT optional movement in which many liberal arts colleges in the US decided not to require SAT or ACT scores as they thought it had outlived its usefulness.

My first reason standardized tests are not a good idea is that they overpopulate the schools. Texas takes 15 and Indiana takes 5. The tests take away time from learning more about a subject. Our country as a whole takes way to many standardized tests. standardized tests are overpopulating schools and not letting kids learn more parts of the subjects.

Since students know that state test scores are a big thing in their future, some students would even cheat on their test to get a better score. Including, state testing does not provide feedback to get a better score next year so they won't know how they can get a better score the next year.(source- Pros and cons of standardized testing)

The purpose of this proposal is to examine current and future Iowa State University admissions decisions processes. At the present time most colleges, including Iowa State use a combination of standardized test scores, high school class rank, high school grade point average, and essays to make decisions on admissions. All of the above are good determinants of a student’s possible success in college, except standardized test scores. Standardized tests discriminate against minorities and are not a good overall indicator of a student’s potential. For these reasons and others, Iowa State should not use standardized test scores when making admissions

Acedemic achievment will not improve, students should't have to take a standerized goverment test to allow them to get ther highschool diploma. All students learn difrently if that is with hands on experience, taking easy A classes, or taking honors classes everybody is diffrent in the way that they learn. These students about to graduate have been going to school for tweleve years now this test wont help future students with anything, the only good thing this test will do is show the goverment what exactly each school district is teaching there students.

The College Board Should Be Abolished The SAT was first administered in 1926, and the acronym originally stood for “Scholastic Aptitude Test.” However, once critics noted that “success on the test demonstrated an aptitude for doing well on the Scholastic Aptitude Test and little else,” the College Board dropped the meaning behind the acronym (Nelson). Now, the “SAT” just means, well, the SAT. Since the beginning of the SAT, The College Board has expanded its role in the standardized testing industry, and now also administers AP Tests and SAT Subject tests.

“The SAT in recent years has become the main assessment used in some states to measure how much high school students have learned” (Zinshteyn), it is big step into becoming a college a student since the year it was enacted in 1926. The SAT is a standardized test that measures your skills in both math and english, along with your writing, it is mainly taken between junior and senior year of high school and is a major impact on deciding your college admittance depending on your college. A new SAT was enacted recently claiming to level the playing field for all students who deserve and are willing to work hard for en education, “The overall topics have not changed the SAT still quizzes you on math, english and writing. The only difference is that the new SAT combines reading and writing into one section within the SAT”

This first reason that colleges should stop using the ACT/SAT is that some people are simply not skilled in taking standardized tests. Cecelia Simon confirms that “Some students really struggle with standardized testing, and their scores don’t reflect their abilities.” (Simon). As simple of a problem as this sounds, there are logical reasons behind poor test taking. One of the main reasons exists when test takers are busy and have other things on their minds causing them to become distracted. For example, if James has a chapter test in his precalculus class the day after he plans on taking the ACT, he is going to be distracted while taking his ACT. Since he was distracted, his score will not be accurate in relation to his

The idea of not using a person ACT or SAT scores to ensure admission is a great idea. Most students want to get into a college of their dream unless they do well on their ACT or SAT. Some are really good test takers and some just fall under pressure. I think having a lot of pressure on your mind taking a test could push you to want to do better on your test and could also cause failure. It could go both ways. According to Hampshire weighed factors, standardized test do not predict a student's’ success in college. I strongly agree with this because I once had an older friend in the same position and He never got into the college he wanted because of his ACT or SAT. Later, He chose a different college and he did fairly well in all his classes

The College Boared believs that this SAT tests students potential by their revisions made on the exam. The College Board carefully went through each section and displayed information relevant to the workplace and college studies. These revisions include taking away a students calculator on the math portion, or even testing students on historical american figures. All in all, the new SAT is displayued with a purpose behind each and every question. The old SAT was tricky and really is hard for students who don’t test well. According to Atkinson and Geiser, “the exam will be a more straightforward test of material that students encounter in the classroom(Atkinson and Geiser). The exam being straight forward is more fair for

Although students may have enough time to prepare for the SAT/ACT, there are many distractions that could prevent the student from getting a good score. The SAT/ACT both require students to answer a load of questions in little time; the student would be more focused on trying to answer all questions rather than getting as many right as they can. One other distraction could be the student’s testing environment. The student may have

Supporters of the test may state it is a good base or “key” to use and gage a student when looking to gauge their academic skill level. Swing to the other side and it’s unsurprisingly easy to find the reasons to oppose the test. Reasons include that the test prevents some students from unlocking their full academic potential due to their lack of easily available resources. Lack of these resources could be due to financial situations or a person’s ethnic background. Studies show the SAT cannot predict a student’s performance in secondary school. These studies examine and exhibit to us (the viewer) that the SAT lacks in showing a student’s true qualities and work ethic. Segregating students based on a test prevents a student from possibly unlocking their full potential. Students judged by their SAT are not the only ones missing out on potential academic success, the future of America loses the chance to further educate the next generation of potential