Pros And Cons Of Non-Title I Schools

Although the balance of power between the national government and the states has changed over the years, the federalist system is a fundamental part of the U.S. government (The White House, 2013). The states sponsor important programs to fund education, help troubled cities and provide social services. At the local level, the municipalities control a number of other services and regulations, but never fail to be in collaboration between the national, state and local governments. The constitution was put into place to support and defend the basic right of civilians of the United States (Marchant, 2003). Although the Constitution does not refer to education, operation and management of schools is made, particularly with respect to amendments to protect individual rights of students, faculty and staff. With these set laws into place to hold our country

Essentially, Article VII makes the State and its legislators solely responsible for the success of public schools and their students. Why then are there so many differences in education budgets in the incredibly rich state of Texas? The underlying reason of such differences, lies in how Texas funds local schools. In the state of Texas, school and public buildings are funded primarily through property taxes. Arguably, this makes richer neighborhoods have more efficient school systems than lower income neighborhoods. Presently, the problem of funding lower income schools has been a topic of hot debate since the

Title 1 funds are intended to provide instruction and instructional support for these disadvantaged children so that they can master challenging curricula and meet state standards in core academic subjects. Title 1 is designed to support local school reform efforts tied to increasing student achievement. In order for a local school to qualify for Title 1 funds, at least 40% of students must come from low-income families. But this is where it gets tricky for White Pine County.

money for both school and states, because school can cut down the number of teachers to hire and

Education is the foundation to secure an individual in having a better future and a successful career in life. Public education primarily falls upon the state and local government to take charge of, which get divided up into local school districts that are managed by school boards. School boards are “ an elected body corporate which manages delegated powers in regards to the deliver of education service within a defined territory (Duhaime’s Law Dictionary)”. Each state “has its own department of education and laws regulating finance, the hiring of school personnel, student attendance, and curriculum (Corsi-Bunker, Antonella).

Indirectly, or directly, one can argue, public schools are controlled by the federal and state governments. Several issues have emerged, because of the conflict between federal and state requirements for education. “Under the Tenth Amendment, any authority not given specifically to the federal government is reserved to the states. Thus, the federal government has no authority to regulate education directly; that belongs to the states” (Underwood, n. d., p. 2). To get around this, the federal government controls the schools through funds for complying with certain initiatives, procedures, and policies (Underwood, n. d.). Ironically, both the state and federal levels of government hold the district liable for implementing different agendas and legal obligations. The federal government, however, can ensure that no citizen is denied their rights or privileges, even in a private institution, because of the Bill of Rights and other amendments. Failure to comply by these amendments or statutes can lead to the loss of federal funding and legal reproductions for schools.

All three of the policies are in some way a little bit different than the current system in place in New York. Delaware uses a three-tier system that allows the state and local government to share the responsibility of making decisions regarding distribution. Tier 1 provides funding for the cost for such things as teachers salaries and their benefits. In addition, this Tier determines the amount of money needed per pupil, meaning that the number of students in the district determines the amount of funds that a district received. Tier II: this is the amount of money given to the district by the state to cover such things as schools supplies, building maintenance and utilities. Tier III: this is the fund, provided to the districts base on their pupil number, and this helps to equalize things between poor and wealthy districts.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, the Title I funding program is depicted as a policy that “provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers or high percentages of children from low-income families to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards” (“Title I, Part A Program”). The program was intended to close the gap between low income students and others with sufficient income. The policy was introduced January 12, 1965 and passed on April 9, 1965. Throughout time, Title I funding has been thought to be efficient ad successful, however, there is new evidence and data contradicting this statement. Title I funding negatively affected students because it

Section A of Title I provides grants to states to distribute directly to school districts. This is by far the largest source of federal money for local schools. School districts

Education is one of the most important aspects of the United States and it is highly regarded, but, many years ago it wasn’t. In 1887 President Andrew Johnson signed legislation creating the Department of Education. Although Andrew Johnson a president, created this department it was still looked down upon. It was one of the departments that might’ve been considered a joke to the cabinet because it wasn’t allowed to be represented in the cabinet. And when thinking about it, having the education department not in the cabinet where the bills are created, was a crazy thought , especially to think that people who weren’t really in the education system other than being a student is allowed to call the shots in attempts to make it fair for the education

If a school receiving federal Title I funding failed to meet the target two years in a row, it would be provided technical assistance and its students would be offered a choice of other public schools to attend. Students in schools that failed to make adequate progress three years in a row also were offered supplemental educational services, including private tutoring. For continued failures, a school would be subject to outside corrective measures, including possible governance changes.

Because iZone schools were once priority schools in the district which mean they were the lowest performing in the district I believe these schools should receive additional support in order to move these students academically. Sometimes we have the tendency to make decisions based on everyone, and it cannot be the case in every situation. When we are teaching our students we adjust our teaching to accommodate individual learning abilities. Some students may get more time with the teacher individually and other don't, is this ethical absolutely because the ones who struggle may need more one on one support than the ones who may have a question here and there. Since iZone schools were once the lowest performing in the school district, they

Local control of school districts has proven to have mixed results. Local control allows districts to experiment and keeps problems from one district affecting another. At the same time however, local control keeps good ideas from spreading quickly. Local districts have produced a diverse range of possible solutions to the problems that public schools face. Unfortunately, the huge amount of diversity that is present from district to district has also made progress harder to measure.

The IZone Schools receives several perks. The number one perk that most of us talk about is the teacher and principal incentive pay. Teachers have an opportunity to earn between $7500 to $15000 extra each year. Another perk is that each school has some autonomy to do what is in the best interest of their students (The Innovative Schools, n.d.). The IZone Schools do not have to work under the exact prescribed doctrine that the district and the state require. Last but not least, the schools are given additional funds to enhance or implement new innovative programs to engage students (The Innovative Schools, n.d.).

Schools have a number of various sources. The primary sources are federal, state, and local funding. The majority of funding comes from state and local sources; whereas a small percent (usually 9-12%) comes from the federal level. The method by which schools receive funding is through the taxation process. At the state level, taxes are levied from taxpayers, both corporate and citizens via sales and income tax. At the local level, school funding comes from property taxes. Let’s explore the how the various sources of school funding. “According to the National Center for Education Statistics, state and local funding accounts for approximately 93 percent of education expenditures” (Woodruff, 2008, ¶ 2). Let’s examine these various sources of revenue and funding and different formulas for allocation along with their pros and cons.