preview

Pros And Cons Of Open Rule

Decent Essays

There are pros and cons of assigning an open rule to a bill as opposed to a closed rule. First of all, an open rule is one of the House amendment restrictions, it describes the conditions and terms applied to a bill that allow the Congress members to make a wide range of amendments to it. According to the pros, they regarding the use of the open rule even the House of Representatives has not used under an open rule since the 1980’s, because they think this rule decreases the power of committees such as control the bill that committee used for something that they do not deserve to use. On the other hand, the people who against an open rule to a bill, they think an open rule may cause the abuse of power of committees because it allow members …show more content…

These war-making power developed over time. Through the Korean War and the Vietnam War, the president got the power to initiate hostilities without consulting the Congress. The War Power Act, is the example for the power of the president, it describes that the president is able to progress the war without the consent of National Assembly for 60 days. But the Congress still have the power to declare war based on the constitution. I do disagree with this development. Personally, I strongly against war. I believe the war is the most barbarous thing ever that human being can be done, and most war laid the country to waste. War changes everything such as people, history, even it’s able to destroy all living things. The war never be the choice due to any circumstances. For most people who made decision of war, they may think war is war, they don’t count others for much because they never enter the war as a soldier. This is the point that I don’t agree with the war-making powers by the Constitution. In the war, soldiers fight for their lives, but the people who have the war-making powers usually not risking their lives as much as other soldiers. This is totally

Get Access