There are pros and cons of assigning an open rule to a bill as opposed to a closed rule. First of all, an open rule is one of the House amendment restrictions, it describes the conditions and terms applied to a bill that allow the Congress members to make a wide range of amendments to it. According to the pros, they regarding the use of the open rule even the House of Representatives has not used under an open rule since the 1980’s, because they think this rule decreases the power of committees such as control the bill that committee used for something that they do not deserve to use. On the other hand, the people who against an open rule to a bill, they think an open rule may cause the abuse of power of committees because it allow members …show more content…
These war-making power developed over time. Through the Korean War and the Vietnam War, the president got the power to initiate hostilities without consulting the Congress. The War Power Act, is the example for the power of the president, it describes that the president is able to progress the war without the consent of National Assembly for 60 days. But the Congress still have the power to declare war based on the constitution. I do disagree with this development. Personally, I strongly against war. I believe the war is the most barbarous thing ever that human being can be done, and most war laid the country to waste. War changes everything such as people, history, even it’s able to destroy all living things. The war never be the choice due to any circumstances. For most people who made decision of war, they may think war is war, they don’t count others for much because they never enter the war as a soldier. This is the point that I don’t agree with the war-making powers by the Constitution. In the war, soldiers fight for their lives, but the people who have the war-making powers usually not risking their lives as much as other soldiers. This is totally
Within sixty calendar days….” The War Powers Act is to limit the president and that he must run all military actions by congress for approval. This makes it so our president cannot just make all the decisions he wants. Within 60 calendar days he must either declare war or enact permission. Congress must approve anything before actions are to take place.
One time that the war power was used was on June 18, 1812. They used the power to declare war on Great Britain. They decided to declare war on them because Great Britain had made a bunch of trade rules and that messed up the trade that was going on between France and America. It was James Madison’s idea to go to war, but since he doesn’t have the power to he had to send a letter to the senate requesting it. The houses then voted on it and the for was
Pro: Transparency in legislature house proceedings and allows public awareness 72 hours prior to passing any bills. No tax imposes.
“When war is thrust upon the nation, the President had not only the authority but the responsibility to ‘resist force by force.’” –U.S. Supreme Court ruling of the Prize Cases, 1862 (67 U.S. 6335).
The War Powers Act limits the power of the President of the United States to wage war without the approval of the Congress. The War Powers Act is also known as The War Powers Resolution. The purpose of the War Powers Resolution is to ensure that Congress and the President share in making decisions that may get the United States involved in hostilities. It prohibits the President from waging war beyond 60 days without the Congressional approval (MILNET: The War Powers Act of 1973). Authorization can be made in many forms such as a temporary waiver of the Act or via a Declaration of War (MILNET: The War Powers Act of 1973).
In the article, “Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory,” Terry M. Moe and William G. Howell, two political science instructors from Stanford University, investigate a source of presidential power, which is the president’s capability to act individually and make his own law, that has been unacknowledged yet essential to presidential leadership that it defines how the modern presidency is distinctively modern. The authors’ purpose in the article is to outline a theory of this feature of presidential power by arguing that the president’s powers of unilateral action, which is developed from the ambiguity of the contract, are strengths in American politics since they are not mentioned in the constitution. They also claim that presidents push the ambiguity of the contract to make their powers grow and that Congress and the courts would not be able to stop them (Moe and Howell, 1999, p. 1-3).
Congress passed the War Powers Act that acknowledges the presidential right to take limited military action before receiving congressional approval, but requires him to file a formal report with Congress within forty-eight hours of initiating hostilities. The use of military action is limited to sixty days without congressional approval. An additional thirty days can be granted if it is necessary to withdraw the troops.
“Rede” means “counsel” or “advice”, it has Germanic roots, from “Raten” and the Dutch “Rede”, both with comparable meanings. Notable redes are The Norse Rede of Honor and The Wiccan Rede. Since the word “Rede” is easily looked up in any dictionary I will focus instead on the Wiccan Rede, which I guess is the real focus of this assignment. It is important, when practicing any religion to understand the rules of the religion and the history of those rules, following anything on blind faith is foolish, even if those words are sound advice such as “an it harm none do what ye will.” So I will begin with a brief history of the Wiccan Rede.
LBJ also set a precedent for sidelining Congress in the decision about whether to go to war—a decision that the Constitution explicitly gave to the legislature, not the president. In 1973, Congress tried to hit back with the War Powers Resolution, written to reassert its constitutional prerogative. But, as Maddow shows, that idea has been kicked around by every president from Ronald Reagan (Grenada) to Bill Clinton (the Balkans) to the Georges Bush (Saddam) to Barack Obama (Libya). Congress doesn’t declare war, and the president sends the troops anyway.
Decisions that presidents had made previously with little congressional participation. Under Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. Congress is granted responsibility for caring out their powers as well as all other powers in the Constitution. This gives them the constitutional right to establish certain procedural implements for war proceedings. Thus, the central purpose of the War Powers Resolutions to restrain the president from unilaterally deploying U.S. Armed Forces. Constant with this intent, legislation imposed the president to report and consult with congress. More notably, it provides congressional supervision by permitting congress to force troop
Despite the fact that there are significant disadvantages to this rule there are some advantages, including limiting the function of the judiciary. Furthermore, constitutionally it honours parliamentary sovereignty and the entitlement of Parliament to produce law. Overall, it is indisputable that the literal rule, when
There are many benefits for the purpose of making the constitution so complicated to amend. They wanted to ensure that both parties could decide on
I will start with the opponents of the exclusionary rule. Opponents argue that the exclusionary rule has strayed from its original purpose, and that it no longer does what it was originally intended to.
Does the media and the amount of exposure to specific news media affect fear of crime? This question is examined in a survey with data collected from three universities in the United States and one in Canada; The Impact of Media on Fear of Crime among University Students: A Cross-National Comparison, goes over the results. It’s believed that fear in itself can be debilitating leading to harmful social outcomes. Vincent Sacco believes there are three dimensions to fear of crime: cognitive, emotional and behavioral. Cognitive looks at a how a person assesses their likelihood of being victimized. Emotional is how someone feels about crime, and behavioral is a person’s response to fear of their perceived likelihood of being victimized.
In the admittedly short life time of the Presidential branch its occupants have taken massive strides in empowering and strengthening their office. At times a case could be made that the executive has aspired to too much; threating essential American political values, such is the case of President Franklin Roosevelt who secured a third term of office ignoring precedent and tradition. However, evidence would suggest that for any significant step a president takes towards increasing their power; often results in an equal and opposite reaction. That is not to say that our presidents are weak, in actuality we see that our presidents have significantly increased their power to wage war