Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

Many believe that college athletes should not be paid. The main debate against compensating college athletes is that they are at the university for educational purposes and playing sports is a benefit. The NCAA states, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (McCauley 10). Universities get all the financial benefits of the money earned from sports played from things such as team jerseys, sports passes and tickets, etc. Many argue that it is only fair to give a portion of the profit to the players that earned the money. It is very important when arguing for or against paying college athletes to not take into fairness, but to hold

It seems the conversation is here to stay. The question, “Should college athletes be paid?” is re-hashed regularly. There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university. We’ve got a breakdown of the pros and cons. The pros list the arguments for why college athletes should be paid and the cons list the arguments for why college athletes should not be

First, some say that college athletes should be paid because of the fact that the schools and the NCAA make billions. In an article from USA Today, it stated: “NCAA made more than $1 billion for the year” (Mama). On the other hand, they should not be paid because tons of the athletes get scholarships, they are rewarded with a free education, and they are technically getting around twenty-thousand dollars a year. First, in an article from Scholorshipstats.com in statistics from 2015 regarding the amount of scholarship money that was given out was nearly 2.2 billion dollars.

Should College Athletes Be Paid? In today’s society college athletes being paid or not carries a lot of controversy. In the article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?”, Joe Nocera and Bob Williams both argue this issue. Even though college athletes help make money for the school, college players should not be paid because it could force discrimination amongst other sports, and students could lose their focus.

Some college athletes were starving in their dorm after practicing and playing in games for a week straight. Since they make no money from the sport the play they decided to call and beg their coach to buy food for them. Recently the have been pushing him to talk to someone about getting them paid to play college football. This isn’t the only time this has happened. Student compensation has been a big topic in the world of sports. The NCAA has been an amateur league ever since its creation. It was never thought of widely to pay college athletes 10-20 years ago but many are thinking it may be it may be time to start paying the athletes. Since the beginning of college sports and the NCAA there have been many debates on whether or not college

I believe college athletes should be paid. College athletes need money for necessities such as food, clothing, and toiletry. The NCAA admits a “full scholarship” does not cover the basic necessities for a student-athlete therefore the student athlete would need money for other things. Student athletes need money because some students parents can’t afford to send their daughter/son money. “The national collegiate athletic association acknowledges that the amount provided in an athletic scholarship is not enough to provide for many things a typical college student needs.”(2, Geoff Griffon).

Paying College Athletes Many people believe that athletes should get paid for their hard work, but others believe that it would ruin the morality of sport if they tend to get paid. They also think that colleges spend millions on athletes most of whom will not step foot on the court or field again, but instead it is the athletes who are training hard to win the money for their college so why not pay them back even though as a simple gift. They are in the best position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world. College athletes are just like regular athletes except they don’t have a lot of experience. I believe that colleges should, in some way pay the athletes that represent their school.

“There’s far more that goes into being a professional athlete than being a college athlete. So many differences that people don’t realize. It’s not just about playing football and getting paid to do it. There’s a lot of things you have to deal with.” This quote was said by Robert Griffin, who is an American football quarterback that was drafted in 2012 to the Washington Redskins in the NFL draft. This man is explaining how there is a reason that professional athletes are paid. They are paid because they must deal with other things that college athletes don’t have to deal with and because they made it to the pros. Students should be against college athletes being paid because it is illegal, they aren’t at the professional level of play, and it would tear about the bond they have with their teammates. Not a lot of people can say that they did that and for college athletes to be complaining and taking money under the table is so wrong. You’re in college and your nothing compared to those guys. I don’t care if you’re the best in the NCAA, there is absolutely no reason you should be making money while in college. Most of these guys have full scholarships so there that’s your motivation to play.

What college athlete would not want to be paid to play the sport that he or she loves? The real question is, though, should college athletes be paid for their roles in a college’s athletics? They are many points to each side of this recent controversial topic, which is why this has been made into such a hot debate in the past couple of years. As of right now, these athletes are not getting paid, but many of them truly believe that they should. Others believe that they already are being paid through certain types of scholarships and don’t deserve anything more than that. With that being said, there are two sides of this topic that have quality points.

How would paying college athletes be economically beneficial to students, college athletes, and colleges? This topic has many controversial answers. In his article “Sharing the Wealth with College Athletes,” William C. Rhoden states, “In fact, the revenue plan is aimed and designed to be a perk for seniors that complete the cycle: Those who play hard and earn their degrees” (8). He further explains how colleges “reward” their college athletes. A contradicting point of view to Rhoden’s is shared in Joe Posnanski’s article “College Athletes Should Not be Paid”. According to this article he states, “No, college athletics is not about the players. College athletics is FOR the players” (Posnanski). In saying this he reveals he does not support the paying of college athletes. Although Rhoden’s article doesn’t specifically speak of the paying of athletes it refers to the substitution after they “earn it” per say. Paying college athletes. Many think it would not be economically beneficial. How would paying college athletes be economically beneficial? Paying college athletes would be economically beneficial because it would allow for more academic scholarships instead of more sports scholarships, help the college athletes by receiving the payment to pay for other necessities and enhancing their performance, and giving the colleges less trouble with athletes dropping out or having to resign.

Student athletes should not be paid. A misconception is that all athletic programs in the NCAA make head-over-toe profit. There are three divisions of intercollegiate athletics, and frankly division three athletic programs don’t make as much or have a profit when compared to division one programs. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue”. (Paying College Athletes) The truth is only a fraction of athletic programs are actually profitable, while most pose a cost to the institution. The question arises primarily in division one programs and typically in the sports of basketball and football. The argument is made that these institutions receive millions of dollars from their student athletes’ performance, in return they should be paid.

Over the last few years there has been renewed controversy about whether college athletes should be paid. The idea of paying college athletes goes back to the early 1900s with one of the first inter collegiate competitions between Harvard and Yale. The modern position of the National Collegiate Athletic Association is that athletic scholarships provide a free college education in return for participating on the university team. Many college athletes dedicate more than forty hours of training per week. College is expensive. How can we expect college athletes to pay for books and other basic necessities if they are busy practicing or participating in home games or traveling to away games? The NCAA needs to start paying these athletes to supplement

PAying college athletes would turn their college career into a job. College is not meant for another option of a job. Students learn more on a specific category for example business or teaching. If athletes were paid they would focus more on gaining more money playing the sport they love, instead of gaining education on what they want to do for a living. According to CNBC, “ The March Survey from National College Players Association and Drexel University said that the projected fair market value of the average college football player is 178,000.” College athletes should not be paid because college is for learning and not a job.

College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every

The world of sports has grown larger than life over the past century, especially in college. Being a collegiate athlete is, without question, the hardest athletic profession in the world. Not only are students devoted to their sport, which requires an obscene amount of time of preparation, but they are also devoted to their school work. And the award they receive for their hard work? Of course there are the great memories, friendships made, “free education”, or national championships, but are theses students receiving their fair share? Should college athletes be paid? It is a question that has been asked, but never truly answered. College athletes should be paid for their work. I even have the perfect system to see