Pros And Cons Of Sex Education In Public Schools

Sexual education in schools has become a highly controversial topic over the past few years. Some people believe students should be taught abstinence-only education, while others believe students need the full on “sex talk”. While the sex education controversy may seem silly, it is very important that students receive the most efficient education possible. When it comes to education parents want their children to receive the most effective kind. This is also very true in terms of sex education. Sex education is very debatable right now as to whether students should be taught abstinence-only education or comprehensive sex education.

Sex education should be implemented at an early age beginning at the middle school level. A discussion of contraception, the risks of diseases, the risk of becoming an unwed teen parent and the disadvantages of not having an education will help decrease the number of teen pregnancies with future generations. Parents should not feel threatened of having their children learning about sex in class. Parents should feel empowered; it will allow their children opportunities to feel they are able to discuss future topics of sex at home to help promote

The issue of comprehensive sex education has sparked debates among parents, teachers and even lawmakers. Children have the right to knowledge and this right to knowledge should not be limited to what is taught in abstinence only sex education, and this is why comprehensive sex education should be taught in schools. Some parents believe that if they do not teach their children about sex, their children will not have sex, but this is not true. Comprehensive sex education better equips young adults to protect themselves, but it also respects their right to be given accurate information that will be used for their entire lives.

The goals of sex education are to help young people achieve a positive view of

Sex Education around our country plays a huge part in developing a sense of mind and background knowledge before crawling into bed. Citizens in the united states should be so fortunate and lucky to come from a place where a high school diploma is practically mandatory. However, after teaching some child the ins and outs of sex it might only encourage them more to pursue sex. Teaching them might make children more adapt to feel as if they are an expert which can derail the whole idea behind educating them. The most the prior knowledge about sex can teach students the signs and symptoms of herpes and other inflectional problems if they are not

Sex Ed is an important subject to learn in school and a key part of the curriculum.

Since the first sex education video, "Human Growth" was shown in public schools in the 1940's, sex education in school has remained a controversial subject (Bellafante 9.1). In the present however, it is no longer disputed whether or not sex-ed should be taught, but what should be taught in a sex education program. Conservatives and Liberals both agree that sex education in public schools is important but, their views on what should be taught differ dramatically. Despite the various monikers to describe different sex education programs and curricula, there are really only two types: abstinence-until-marriage and comprehensive (Sex Education Programs: Definitions & Point-by-Point

“I don’t worry about sex education in the schools,” said comedian Milton Berle, “If the kids learn it like they do everything else, they won’t know how.” (Milton Berle Quotes About School). While incredibly witty, Berle’s comment perfectly exemplifies the ongoing issues with the way students in American public schools are being taught sex education. Misinformation, myths, and straight-up lies are being fed to students who carry the lessons they learn into their relationships, causing more harm than good. Courses that teach students sexual education should not be seen as a detrimental goal, but rather such curriculum should be utilized to create more mature, responsible adults, who are understanding of how to navigate the complexities of

In the united states, there are two schools of thought when it comes to educating students on human sexuality. Sexual education is a broad term that applies to the teaching to information from basic contraceptive use, biological reproduction, the spread of infectious disease, and sexuality. One type of sexual education is referred to as Comprehensive Sexual Education. Comprehensive Sexual Education is curriculum rooted in health and life skills, that strives to teach students medically accurate information on healthy relationships, development, side effects and benefits of birth control methods, abstinence lifestyles, and how to avoid unwanted sexual advances. The other type of sexual education is referred to as Abstinence

People say that sex education teaches the students about how sexual intercourse is done but the truth is sex education lets the students know about the consequences and the truth about sex. One may likely suffer emotional or mental depression which may lead to suicide. Students are also informed that it is only for unity and procreation of married couples who are committed to each other. They are also informed that they will know the true purpose of sex when they grow up as adults. Appropriate sex education in schools has a great impact on preventing sexual problems in adulthood. Also, it teaches students on what is right and what is wrong.

As children grow, they accumulate knowledge over the years about a variety of subjects to prepare them for the future. Children learn from parents, schools, life experiences, what they watch and other influences around them, and it can be either positive learning or negative learning. There is one subject that is difficult to teach and have control over because of misunderstandings, lack of teaching, and publicity. Sex education has been a major debate for children under eighteen, because there are some parents that want it taught in schools and others that do not because of different reasons. There are currently eighteen states and the District of Columbia that require schools to provide sex education and thirty-two that do not require

Most of the sex education during the nineteenth and early twentieth century were based on religious and moral values. As we learned in class, teachers were supposed to have the best morals that were around, so it makes sense that talking about sex during this time was not an accepted thing to talk about or much less teach young students about. But in the early 1900s people started seriously considering what students needed to be taught in regards to sex (History of Sex Ed…). In the 40s and 50s are when things really started to take off. STDs were spreading substantially and so finally a bit of sex education was taught in the classroom. There were issues with this however because there was not an agreed method of teaching Sex Ed across the nation or even across the states (History of Sex Ed…). After contraceptives were made available, and after many debates about material and what we should be teaching kids about sex, there finally was some stability when it came to Sex Ed in the 1980s when the surgeon general made it mandatory for all public schools to teach Sex Ed (History of Sex Ed…). However, there were really no clear rules on how it would be taught, which is why we have such a big problem with it today. So why is this still an issue? Shouldn’t we have this figured out by now?

Some parents want sex education to be taught in public schools. Hickman-Brown Research Incorporated made a survey in 1999 based on when sex education should be taught to their children. Ninety-three percent of parents believe that sex education should be taught in high school, and eighty-four believe that sex education should be taught in middle school. (Carnal) “Studies have shown that sixty-six percent of high school students have had sexual activity before their senior year of high school.” Says Masland (Carnal) So why not go ahead and tell them the outcomes of sexual activity so that they at least know what is to be expected?

Sex education is and always has been lacking in our country. An increase in sexual education would be greatly appreciated from almost everybody, especially with how high the sexually transmitted disease rate has raised in the past twenty years. Sex education can be used to teach young people how to have safe sex and show them the scary truths of sex that they are never taught otherwise. To lower STD rates and raise pregnancy awareness in younger people, schools and parents should be teaching children about sex.

There are many states that do not provide the kind of sex education that New Jersey strives to convey to its students. It more often than not ties in with the religious right proclaiming that students are too young to be exposed to sexual material, and thus sexualized as a result. These fundamental groups oppose any suggestion towards a comprehensive approach. Instead, they ask that their children be taught after grade school and additionally, they steer towards ‘abstinence-only’ education. Instead of teaching students how to protect themselves, they teach that the only way to protect oneself is by abstaining from sex. The problem arises, then, when these students decide to have sex. They are unaware of how to conduct themselves responsibly, how to take precautions to prevent against unwanted pregnancy and disease. What kind of ‘education’ are students receiving when they are withheld crucial information?