Sweatshops have been around for centuries, beginning around the late 1880’s. Sweatshops are classified by three main components, long work hours, very low pay and unsafe and unhealthy working environments. Sweatshops are usually found in manufacturing industries and the most highlighted production is clothing corporations, who take full advantage of the low production costs of their products. Many may think sweatshops are a thing of the past but they are still affecting many lives across the nations. There are many ways sweatshops affect lives, but a recent article titled “New study finds ‘more sweatshops than Starbucks’ in Chicago” explains that there are many low wage industry jobs that are violating labor laws in the United States alone. The article also reports how employees who are working in such conditions won’t speak up in fear of the retaliation employers will implement. Analyzing Sweatshops through the lens of the Sociological perspectives will help us better understand the illegal conditions of workplaces that still exist today.
Sweatshops are a workplace where workers are subject to extreme exploitation, including the absence of a living wage, poor benefits, health and safety hazards, and random discipline (AMM 245, Kim). According to the department of labor, a sweatshop is a factory that violates two or more labor laws (http://www.dol.gov/). There is much controversy over the definition but sweatshops are manufacturers that don’t pay living wages, have low safety standards, don’t pay overtime, make employees work an abnormal amount of hours, have physical and mental abuse, among other issues. Sweatshops started in America during the industrialization period of the nineteenth period. People from Europe came to the United States in the attempt to create a better life for themselves and when they arrived most of them
would shrink the labor force by 11 million workers, reduce the real GDP by $1.6 trillion and take 20 years to complete (Trump has said he could do it in 18 months)” (The Street, November 1st, 2015).
There are many ways in which sweatshops breach the universal declaration of Human Rights upheld by the United Nations. The UDHD states that ‘’everyone has the right to rest and leisure including reasonable limitation of working hours and period holidays with pay’’. People who work in sweatshops are working in some of the worst conditions. As well as working in harsh conditions, these workers are on a very low wage. $160 dollars a month unfortunately does not last long as most of their wage is spent on rent, which leaves little money left for
Sweatshops are characterized by such things as: “physical working conditions that may have detrimental health and safety consequences for the worker, an intensity of work that is higher than would be found in similar facilities in the developed world, long hours of work with mandatory overtime, low rates of remuneration and uncertainty that the
Sweatshops are factories that are used around the world that major brand companies use to make products. These factories have gained media attention and controversy for the long hours and low pay given to the workers. Many people say to boycott these factories because of the latter reasons, but consumers shouldn’t boycott companies that make sweatshop products. The first reason consumers shouldn’t boycott these products would be people actually deliberately take these jobs because in developing countries most jobs don’t pay that much. The second reason consumers shouldn’t boycott sweatshop products would be that it allows a lot of people in the developing worlds to rise out of poverty.
Migrant member of staff exploitation: The particular migrant workers enter Quotes officially on 417 operating getaway visas, that had been designedas any social swap method. The particular visa makes it possible for migrant workers going in addition to perform for up to half a year in one location, executing low-skilled work for instance berry in addition to organic choosing as well as employed in meats in addition to poultry producers throughout local locations and several cities. Nevertheless Migrant workers from Most of asia in addition to European countries will be typically over used, harassed in addition to bombarded at work, this Four Sides study discovered. A new swindle is it being run simply by greedy your time hire installers : dodgy middle adult males which sell multiple cut-price migrant workers to help farms in addition to producers providing refreshing meal across the nation. The particular exploitation is usually wide-spread as well as the surprising forms of exploitation are all associated with this gross underpayment connected with salaries, along with likely hundreds of millions connected with dollars throughout thieved pay out heading missing out on on a yearly basis.
Abstract: Many countries, industries and people are becoming more affected by sweatshops in different ways because of they’re continuous increase in growth. Sweatshops benefit many developing countries as they provide opportunities of employment to the people living in poverty and benefit the community at large by creating an economic infrastructure that utilizes the country’s resources and increases their tax base. These institutions first came into existence in the early 1800’s and were referred to as dwelling houses, which were local factories that generally had the same idea of the sweatshop that we have in today’s society. There
Many people in developed countries find working conditions in sweatshops unacceptable because of low wages and underage workers. For example Ahmed Zia a 14-year-old Afagan refuge who earns only $2 a day and 8-year-old Kamis Saboor, an afghan refuge who should be going to school instead of working long hours in a manufacturing establishment. The conditions in sweatshops are also known to be terrible, because of the chemical hazards, the lack of ventilation and so on. But we still do not have enough evidence from theses two kids to make a clear judgment.
A vast amount of media outlets and critics focus on the inhumane and unhealthy conditions that sweatshop workers have to undergo. Several anti-sweatshop activists go as far to petition and even boycott the consumption of items produced by sweatshops, which, in my opinion, is perfectly understandable. However, what many activists and media outlets overlook is the many benefits these "sweatshops" offer to the working citizens in third world countries. For instance, while many sweatshops offer poor "non-monetary compensation", or health benefactors for the working public, the alternative occupations any third world citizen could take would be even more underwhelming. In fact, many other occupations that are offered in third world countries would
College Communication 171- Research essay- Sweatshop -Outline FangChia Ho 300940032 Introduction-Thesis statement What makes a country greater? A welfare state, a well healthcare or an organized social welfare?
In foreign countries with more of an unjust government it is common that child labor and sweatshops are in operation. It is easy to have unknowingly purchased clothes made by an 8-year-old girl in a cold factory at 1am. For instance, Asia is very commonly afflicted with sweatshops and it is hard for the U.S. to keep up with other countries issues. Sweatshops and what they stand for are detrimental to the health and safety of the worker’s everyday life. These conditions need to be stopped and reinvented. There are many alternative ways and small tweaks that in the long run can make a tremendous difference to the lives of these workers.
The main problem with many sporting goods stores these days is that many of them aren’t true to what they say about their company. The first step to having a good partnership with the clients is to be true to them about the company’s practices. A major factor in this is the company’s reputation. Being accused of having sweatshops can be enough to ruin a company’s reputation. This report outlines the dangers of using sweatshops to manufacture merchandise. It also covers options that be used as a replacement to using sweatshops. The Tech Sports team has visited Tech Sports’ factories abroad over the past month to determine what corrective actions should be taken to eliminate sweatshops. After connecting with the supervisors and the employees at the factories and inspecting the working conditions it was determined that corrective action is indeed required. During the latter part of the month, research was done to determine appropriate options to eliminate sweatshops.
According to Ian Maitland’s The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshops, there is a large misconception that sweatshops set up by large corporations are a negative force on developing countries and its citizens. This perception is derived from journalists’ claims that corporations underpay their outsourced workers in order to maximize company profit. Additionally, another claim made by these journalists is that the wages received by these workers are below the necessary “living wages” needed in order to survive with dignity. Maitland refutes these claims by focusing on reports of labor conditions at Nike’s Indonesian plant. The majority of these personal accounts present a more favorable perspective of corporations using international suppliers.