Pros And Cons Of Texting Vs Texting

There are bountiful benefits to both calling and texting, as well as detriment. Weather its being able to hear the pitch and tone of your voice to having your connection, verbal calling has been around for generations and whether it should be in addition or opposition to texting is up for debate. The fact of texting being the new main form of communication is up for debate because supporters say its faster and easier than verbal calling, although contradictors say many are harmed because of distractions like in the case of texting and driving.

“Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are

Texting has a sense of immediacy between individuals and allows users to transgress the boundaries of distance. Before the use of mobile phones, technologies such as emailing and paging and even letters allowed individuals to do this, but not with the same speed as texting (Ling, 2005). Informal and natural aspect of texting due to speed involved allows individuals to connect as they would if they were speaking.

Texting allows us to stay in touch with others in a most efficient way. We type a quick text, hit send, and in a matter of seconds our recipient has our text. Receiving a text is fast, but typing out a clear, concise

Calling someone is now a sacred ritual. Unless it is a business call or an emergency, people now veer towards text messaging. It is a quick and easy alternative that does not interrupt someone’s day or force them into conversation. Sherry Turkle and Jenna Wortham discuss this issue in their respective essays. While Turkle believes that this is because the current generation is one of distance, Wortham believes that it is a matter of maturity. I believe that Turkle’s approach to this argument is more effective because she provides more evidence.

Instant gratification has become the social norm in this generation but is diminishing the quality of communication. Cell phones have changed massively in the past few years, making communication weaken each time cell phones are updated. At first, cell phones were just used for calling. Calling was the only operation that they were capable of and most of the time calling was not even convenient on a cell phone. Although the concept of texting has been out for decades, actual texting became available to all society in 1994 (Turrettini). Texting instantly

I don't know a person that doesn't have a phone. Today you almost have to have a cell phone to survive and communicate with other people. We take advantage of what we do have and we focus on what we don't have. Texting is huge today. But as we go on there are more and more “latest and greatest” things coming out.

Today, from toddler to senior citizen uses phone. The most used applicable applications in phone are the text or SMS. I wonder how many people even know what does SMS stands for. We use the short message service to communicate easily because it’s short and quick. The two articles “2b or not 2b” by David Crystal and “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” by Jeffrey Kluger both talks about communicating through texting and our use of language. Crystal is in favor for texting and Kluger is against texting. I agree with Kluger when it comes to this topic, I feel learning how to have a conversation face to face is very important. “I talk to kids and they describe their fear of conversation,” says Turkle. “An 18-year-old I interviewed

    Sherry Turkle, a professor and director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self, wrote an essay called “No Need To Call” to talk about her research on cell phones and social life. She goes in depth into a few lives of those who use their cell phones frequently and those who avoid it. Turkle starts off her essay by talking about Elaine, a seventeen year old. Elaine acknowledges the use of texting within her generation, she states “It’s only on the screen that shy people open up.” (373). Elaine then follows this by speaking of the ability to pause and think before you send a message. You have more time to think before you say something, unlike in person or on the phone. Turkle then reflects on this teen’s analysis, she says, “Elaine is right in her analysis: teenagers flee the telephone. Perhaps more surprisingly, so do adults.” (374).

Everyone wants to stay connected in each others lives by never missing a beat. More like never missing a text message in this day and age. Life is constantly finding its way to become full of responsibilities with little time to take a break as it is. Texting my family and friends is easier to respond to when I 'm taking care of my daughter and studying for school. Even a phone call seems better so I can multitask, cleaning the house or driving while talking on the phone. Communication is an essential key and important human need. By using technology, there is a deeper connection to communicating than some acknowledge.

The reason behind such decision is that unless in urgent situations, other people expect them to text, the technology that is more prevalent and requires less effort to respond than phone (Turkle 375). Although “Tara and Leonora are discontent, but do not feel they have a choice. This is where technology has brought them” (Turkle 375). From those examples, we can easily observe that because the notions of using certain technology have already became parts of our general social roles, people can no longer resist the influence of it regardless of our feeling.

Right now in 2016, texting may seem very small in comparison to todays communication but a few years ago it was a big topic, like a competition in the whole UK big. There where 2 types of people, the people whole supported TxT and the ones who didn't. John Humphrys is a

The ability to communicate quickly and efficiently allows for the transmission of important data instantaneously. One such example of this is emergency text messages that can be provided to individuals for natural disasters. Should a natural disaster be about to affect an area such as a tornado, sever storm, flood, etc., people that live in that area can have emergency texts sent to their phones to warn them about the impending danger. This can literally save the lives of those who would have been otherwise caught unaware of the potential danger that they were in. Additionally, text messaging allows for people to maintain personal relationships with those that they do not have the ability to see on a regular basis. As a study showed, the average teenager uses the text message for about 54% of their interactions with their friends. Face-to-face talking was actually the third most used method of communication, weighing in at 33%. The ability of instant, efficient communication that the text message provides can help people maintain a relationship with a friend when the two literally live on opposite sides of the country (Minshall, 2012).

Mobile phones have become a crucial part of our society today. The increasing number of texts and phone calls is alarming. Texting and calling have become popular ways of communication. Over the past twenty years, there has probably been more texts sent and received than calls. Although texting may be faster, more organized, and convenient, it also takes full concentration, has a delayed response, and emotion or sarcasm is hard to detect. Calling, on the other hand, can be more personal, more information and detail can be communicated, and an immediate response is received. Even though there are many benefits of calling, there are also some downsides. For example, the receiver might not answer, more personal conversations take longer, and words and thoughts are on the spot. Calling and texting both can be good ways of communication, it all depends on the point you are trying to portray.

The main cause of the texting craze is the ability to send and receive quick messages. It is simpler than making a phone call and getting caught up in a conversion when your time is limited. It also allows you to share and respond instantly so there is a sense of always being connected to peers. Texting has become more popular than talking on the phone or even face to face. So much so that “texting has become the way that adolescents forge social bonds, and texting between adolescents often serves to promote social cohesion in peer groups”