Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

The death penalty is still in use in the united states. The state with the most executions is in Texas with a total of 545 from 2017 to the year 1976 (Number of Executions, 2017). The death penalty is a very big debate. There are many reasons why and why people do and don’t like the death penalty.

Even after these devastating facts, the death penalty still isn’t being put down in the United States. Thirty two of the fifty states in America allow for capital punishment. Lethal injections are the number one way to execute a criminal in America, and there are many other methods offered in select states. Texas, a state that strongly supports capital punishment, was the first state to carry out lethal injections on December 7, 1982 for the execution of Charles Brooks. Texas is also the first in the number of executions in the United States. If Texas made the death penalty illegal, the number of executions in the United States would decrease dramatically. Electrocution, lethal gas, a firing squad and even hangings still occur in the United States and are secondary options for many criminals in the country.

The death penalty has been a controversy in the United States justice system since its commencement (Bakken & Morris, 2010). Although extremely controversial, it has stood the test of time as the definitive penalty. Numerous countries are at present bring an end their death penalty law. Contrary to that, the United States has thirty eight out of its fifty states with death penalty still operational. It seems the United States needs the death penalty more than ever before due to rising rate of sever violent crimes across the nation. Statistics shows that since the early nineties roughly around 355 people have been put to death through death penalty and approximately 3300 are still waiting on death row. Similarly since 1976 around 552 felons have been put to rest through death penalty across the United States (Bakken & Morris, 2010). If you break these deaths down according to the methods utilized about three hundred ninety-four by lethal injection, one hundred forty-one by electrocution, eleven by gas chamber, three by hanging, and two by firing squad. Almost half of the 1976 executions have taken place within the last five years, which includes 52 that took place this year. Even though the death penalty has brought countless gooey criminals to end, the course of death penalty that it is founded on is inconsistent one.

In Kellow Chesney's book The Victorian Underworld illustrates that the Victorians tried to use the death penalty as a means of controlling criminal elements in forms of hangings, lethal injection,Electrocution, and firing squads in order to prevent crime( the victorian underworld). in Victorian times, the death penalty was used as a means of controlling. There should be abolishment of this because of the countless innocent men and women being put to death for the stated purpose of preventing crime out of fear. So There should not be a death penalty because it violates human rights, it does not deter crime, and is a cruel and unusual punishment.

The history of the death penalty is a long and brutal one. From the stoning and crucifixion killings of the B.C. era to today’s methods of the electric chair and lethal injection, governments of one kind or another have sentenced people to death for thousands of years. Capital punishment does not work, there is an interest of mounting evidence that proves this .The death penalty, both in the U.S. and around the world, is discriminatory and is used disproportionately against the poverty-stricken, minorities and members of racial, ethnic and religious communities. Since humans are fallible, the risk of executing the innocent can never be eliminated. Death row inmates in the U.S. typically spend over a decade awaiting execution. Some prisoners have been on death row for well around 20 years. During this time, they are consistently isolated from other prisoners, excluded from prison educational and work

The death penalty, while simple in concept, is sadly complex in execution. There are laws on when the death penalty may be used and how the death happens. There is a supposed racial and social bias on a process that is still debated whether or not it is still constitutional. The victim’s family themselves are debate for and against it. It is those debates may take years to decide whether or not to kill the suspect.

The next information I found was the one organization that is trying to abolish the capital punishment. In there website it talks about how qoute “ Killing People Because They Killed People to Show That Killing People Is Wrong’ Makes Sense, Right?” These people don’t really like about the death penalty because they think it is not right to kill someone else just because they killed someone as to them they rather want the person lucked up for life and have them die of natural causes instead by force. With this organization they have help as to try to have over 20 national organizations. In the state of Nebraska there is a map where it shows that it has been Abolished in 2015. In 1976 there has been 3 Executions since. As of right now there is 10 people in death row waiting. Last as to one person to be Innocent and to be free from death row.

There are a total of 3,350 inmates currently on death row. These people include all of the main races in America. In 1965 Robert Massie murdered a mother of two in California during a robbery. Mere hours before he was scheduled to be executed. A stay was issued so he could testify, he had found evidence to support his cases and got parole and a second chance. Eight months later he robbed and murdered a businessman in California. This is a obvious that the death penalty should not be abolished, better yet supported in all states. The death penalty will prove to all mentally unstable criminals the horrors of death and will force them to face it eye to eye if they choose to commit the crime.

Few issues have been as hotly argued and controversial as the death penalty, with its many conflicting moral, social and legal implications. Compelling arguments exist in favor of the final punishment, and equally strong arguments exist to end its practice. Furthermore, considering its conflicting history, on the grand scale of the whole world, and in just America, it is unlikely that this issue will be resolved any time soon. In the United States specifically, the issue has great significance to the bill of rights and the 8th amendment, which prevents cruel and unusual punishment. The death sentence, due to the intense debate on its morality and constitutionality, as well as the

As of August 2017,the death penalty is legal in 31 states. Twenty people were executed in the United States in 2016. Although this number may seem high the death penalty rate has actually been on a decline since the early 2000’s. Since 1973 there have only been 159 death row exonerations. There have only been 54 women on death row and only 22 juveniles have been killed but the American judicial system. Many people commit crimes every day some crimes are so horrific that they can often be sentenced to the death penalty. The death penalty is one of the cruelest acts known to man and it needs to be abolished entirely. Some reasons as to why the death penalty should be abolished are as follows: the death penalty is systematically racist, innocent people can be put to death, it stops any chance of rehabilitation, and it’s simply savage.

The death penalty can be good for some cases but The Oregonians for Alternatives to The Death Penalty said that most corrections personnel who are conducting the executions suffer from PTSD. Death Penalty is bad because of rehabilitation failure, it is a defense mechanism, mentally ill people are set to die, people who conduct the deaths can be scarred, and it violates the 8th amendment.

The Death Penalty: killing people that kill people to show people that killing people is wrong. Use of the death penalty in the United States has always been controversial. Some people believe that it is a fair system in which criminals pay for the crimes they committed and to prevent future crimes. While others believe that it is a broken system, often punishing innocent civilians to a cruel and inhumane death.

The death penalty has been a controversial issue here in the states. It has lived since the 18 B.C. and is still existing in the 21st century. Began with crucifixion, to the failure of lethal injection, and surprisingly a firing squad. None of these sound like a good way to die. We have killed people who were innocent. Not only that, but also its cost is pretty high. Whether it’s actually lowering our crime rates is becoming a problem. The problem lies with the states whether they 'll allow it or not. The Supreme Court has their except for certain circumstances. All of these factors have an impact on how the process works today.

What is the appropriate punishment for a crime? Many believe that criminals deserve capital punishment. Capital punishment is a faulty system in which the negatives outweigh the positives. Sentencing people to death row is a long process that has an emotional toll on the victim’s family. The death penalty goes against many people’s religious beliefs. In many cases, people on death row are later found innocent and released, but in some cases innocent people are executed. It is too expensive to continue sentencing inmates to death when there are other things that are more important to spend money on. Capital punishment has more negative effects than positive effects.

“There is no justice in killing in the name of justice” (Azquotes). This quote from Desmund Tutu represents some logic behind the extermination of the death penalty. There can be no justice in the death penalty. Also, the death penalty has been and always will be wrong on a moral level. Killing is morally wrong, no matter how justified. Some might say that the death penalty lowers crime rates, or saves lives in the long run, but this may not be the case. There has been no evidence that the death penalty lowers crime rates (“What’s New”). Others might say that the death penalty has been reserved only for the “worst of the worst”: people that have committed the most brutal crimes (“Top 10 Pro”). However, many cases have been presented in which the accused may not be considered the “worst of the worst”, or even deserving of jail time (“What’s New”). For these reasons alone the death penalty should be abolished. It is unconstitutional and morally wrong.